Skip to content

· Private foundation

Isabel Spackman Foundation Co Pnc Bank Na

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$50k
Granted FY2025still arriving
7
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$12k
Largest
01What it funds
0182% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Human Services$274kHousing & Shelter$28kEducation$26kReligion$12kHealth$5kCrime & Legal$5kOther$0
02FY2025 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k4 grants · $18k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $32k
$6,600
Median grant
1
States reached
$1.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
EPISCOPAL COMMUNITY SERVICES$11,726
SAINT JAMES SCHOOL$10,000
SAINT JOHN'S HOSPICE$10,000
EVELYN G ELEBY CO PNC BANK NA$6,600
MONICA HOGARTH CO PNC BANK NA$6,300
EPISCOPAL LEGAL AID OF THE DIOCESE OF PA$5,000
VISITING NURSES SOCIETY$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $172k) land where the poverty rate runs at 22%, against an area that typically sits at 16%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 16%EPISCOPAL COMMUNITY SERVICES: $25k → 22%EPISCOPAL COMMUNITY SERVICES: $25k → 22%EPISCOPAL COMMUNITY SERVICES: $24k → 22%EPISCOPAL COMMUNITY SERVICES: $23k → 22%EPISCOPAL COMMUNITY SERVICES: $21k → 22%EPISCOPAL COMMUNITY SERVICES: $20k → 22%EPISCOPAL COMMUNITY SERVICES: $16k → 22%EPISCOPAL COMMUNITY SERVICES: $12k → 22%EPISCOPAL COMMUNITY SERVICES: $6k → 22%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$408k · 11 repeat orgs$5k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +28% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

11 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

11
1

Total granted

$408k
$5k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+28%
0%

Still filing today

27%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 90% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $5k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesEducationCrime & LegalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • EC
    Episcopal Community Services of The Diocese of Pennsylvania
    9× · 2017–2025 · $172k · revenue +24%
  • SJ
    Saint John's Hospice
    4× · 2017–2025 · $28k · revenue +28%
  • SJ
    SAINT JAMES SCHOOL
    4× · 2017–2025 · $26k · revenue +359%

Funded once

  • EL
    EPISCOPAL LEGAL AID OF THE DIOCESE OF PENNSYLVANIA INC
    one grant, 2025 · $5k · revenue 0%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field
04the grantee network

4 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 4 of the 12 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
4/4
Grantees still filing
3/4
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

MONICA HOGARTH CO PNC BANK NA: $48,300 · OtherMONICA HOGARTH CO PNC BANK NAEVELYN G ELEBY CO PNC BANK NA: $39,600 · OtherEVELYN G ELEBY CO PNC BANK NASaint John's Hospice: $27,670 · OtherSaint John's HospiceIndividual grant recipient: $25,200 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient: $20,538 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient: $18,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientJANE W BANNING CO PNC BANK NA: $14,500 · OtherJANE W BANNING CO PNC BANK NAWHOSOEVER GOSPEL MISSION AND: $11,500 · OtherWHOSOEVER GOSPEL MISSION AND+1 more: $5,000 · OtherEpiscopal Community Services of The Diocese of Pennsylvania: $171,547 · Human ServicesEpiscopal Community Services of The Diocese of …SAINT JAMES SCHOOL: $26,395 · EducationEPISCOPAL LEGAL AID OF THE DIOCESE OF PENNSYLVANIA INC: $5,000 · Crime & Legal
Other$210,308Human Services$171,547Education$26,395Crime & Legal$5,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetEpiscopal Community Services of The Diocese of Pennsylvania: $171,547 over 9y, 0.3% of budgetSaint John's Hospice: $27,670 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetSAINT JAMES SCHOOL: $26,395 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetEPISCOPAL LEGAL AID OF THE DIOCESE OF PENNSYLVANIA INC: $5,000 over 1y, 4.5% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Episcopal Community Services of The Diocese of Pennsylvania ↗
  • Who funds Saint John's Hospice ↗
  • Who funds SAINT JAMES SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds EPISCOPAL LEGAL AID OF THE DIOCESE OF PENNSYLVANIA INC ↗

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Isabel Spackman Foundation Co Pnc Bank Na funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Isabel Spackman Foundation Co Pnc Bank Na. Bigger dots raise more.

2025
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 12 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Isabel Spackman Foundation Co Pnc Bank Na’s filings →

    More from the funding graph