Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Isabel Schendel-Robert & Josephine Pieper Tr

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$105k
Granted FY2025still arriving
5
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$26k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Youth Development$502kHealth$251kHuman Services$251kEducation$18k
02FY2025 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $2k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $103k
$25,673
Median grant
2
States reached
$1.9M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
LAD LAKE INC$25,673
THE SALVATION ARMY$25,673
BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF GREATER MILW$25,673
CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF WI FOUNDATION$25,673
EVANS SCHOLARS FOUNDATION$2,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 67% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%LAD LAKE INC: $30k → 5%BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF GREATER MILW: $30k → 17%THE SALVATION ARMY: $30k → 14%LAD LAKE INC: $30k → 5%BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF GREATER MILW: $30k → 17%THE SALVATION ARMY: $30k → 14%LAD LAKE INC: $29k → 5%BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF GREATER MILW: $29k → 17%THE SALVATION ARMY: $29k → 14%LAD LAKE INC: $28k → 5%BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF GREATER MILW: $28k → 17%THE SALVATION ARMY: $28k → 14%LAD LAKE INC: $28k → 5%BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF GREATER MILW: $28k → 17%THE SALVATION ARMY: $28k → 14%LAD LAKE INC: $28k → 5%BOYS GIRLS CLUBS OF GREATER MILW: $28k → 17%THE SALVATION ARMY: $28k → 14%LAD LAKE INC: $27k → 5%BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF GREATER MILW: $27k → 17%THE SALVATION ARMY: $27k → 14%LAD LAKE INC: $26k → 5%BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF GREATER MILW: $26k → 17%THE SALVATION ARMY: $26k → 14%LAD LAKE INC: $25k → 5%BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF GREATER MILW: $25k → 17%THE SALVATION ARMY: $25k → 14%EVANS SCHOLARS FOUNDATION: $2k → 14%EVANS SCHOLARS FOUNDATION: $2k → 14%EVANS SCHOLARS FOUNDATION: $2k → 14%EVANS SCHOLARS FOUNDATION: $2k → 14%EVANS SCHOLARS FOUNDATION: $2k → 14%EVANS SCHOLARS FOUNDATION: $2k → 14%EVANS SCHOLARS FOUNDATION: $2k → 14%EVANS SCHOLARS FOUNDATION: $2k → 14%EVANS SCHOLARS FOUNDATION: $2k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$995k · 5 repeat orgs$28k to everyone else

5 repeat relationships — 5 still active in FY2025, 0 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

5
1

Total granted

$995k
$28k

Still filing today

40%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • LAD LAKE INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $251k · revenue +18%
  • TS
    THE SALVATION ARMY
    9× · 2017–2025 · $251k
  • CH
    CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF WI FOUNDATION
    9× · 2017–2025 · $251k

Funded once

  • BG
    BOYS GIRLS CLUBS OF GREATER MILW
    one grant, 2017 · $28k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field
04the grantee network

2 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 2 of the 6 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
2/2
Grantees still filing
2/2
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

LAD LAKE INC — $251,207 · OtherLAD LAKE INCTHE SALVATION ARMY — $251,207 · OtherTHE SALVATION ARMYCHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF WI FOUNDATION — $251,207 · OtherCHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF WI FOUNDATIONBOYS GIRLS CLUBS OF GREATER MILW — $28,199 · Other+1 more — $18,000 · OtherBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF GREATER MILWAUKEE INC — $223,008 · Youth DevelopmentBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF G…
Other$799,820Youth Development$223,008

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%grantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetLAD LAKE INC — $251,207 over 9y, 0.2% of budgetBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF GREATER MILWAUKEE INC — $223,008 over 8y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds LAD LAKE INC
  • Who funds BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF GREATER MILWAUKEE INC

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Isabel Schendel-Robert & Josephine Pieper Tr funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
2021222324
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY2024

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 6 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph