Skip to content
Isaac J Chehebar Charitable Trust Isaac J Chehebar Trustee at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Private foundation

Isaac J Chehebar Charitable Trust Isaac J Chehebar Trustee

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$410k
Granted FY2025still arriving
47
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$150k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
0185% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2024.

Religion$396kFood & Nutrition$271kEducation$93kPhilanthropy$88kHealth$82kHuman Services$72kArts & Culture$52kInternational$16kOther$0
02FY2025 · 47 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k37 grants · $100k
  • $10k–50k9 grants · $159k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $150k
$2,600
Median grant
5
States reached
$287k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SBH COMMUNITY SERVICES NETWORK$150,000
SEPHARDIC HERITAGE MUSEUM$28,000
KOL YAAKOV INC$26,000
KESHER ORGANIZATION INC$26,000
RENEWAL$23,900
RABBI JACOB S KASSIN CHESED FUND$15,000
CHABAD OF THE SHORE$10,500
BNEI MEACHIM INC$10,000
ILAN LAEL$10,000
UCEF$10,000
PARK AVENUE SYNAGOGUE$8,800
Individual grant recipient$8,015
THE LEGACY FOUNDATION$7,600
HATZALAH EMS OF THE JERSEY SHORE$6,000
SEPHARDIC FOOD FUND INC$5,400
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–25, $205k) land where the poverty rate runs at 20%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%KETER SHLOMO FOUNDATION INC: $1k → 20%KETER SHLOMO FOUNDATION INC: $1k → 20%KETER SHLOMO FOUNDATION INC: $1k → 20%SBH COMMUNITY SERVICES NETWORK: $150k → 20%SBH COMMUNITY SERVICES NETWORK: $50k → 20%LIFE VEST INSIDE INC: $2k → 20%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NY
PA
NJ
RI
CA
MO
MD
DC
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

80%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.3M · 47 repeat orgs$326k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +13% since the first grant, against +11% for those funded once.

47 repeat relationships: 32 still active in FY2025, 15 since wound down; 15 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

47
44

Total granted

$1.3M
$265k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+13%
+11%

Still filing today

32%
32%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 85% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $61k went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24’25
ReligionEducationHealthArts & CulturePhilanthropyInternationalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TK
    THE KESHER ORGANIZATION INC
    3× · 2022–2025 · $146k · revenue +69%
  • TS
    THE SEPHARDIC HERITAGE MUSEUM INC
    3× · 2023–2025 · $60k · revenue +37%
  • TL
    TORAH LEARNING RESOURCES LTD
    3× · 2023–2025 · $36k · revenue +17%

Funded once

  • JF
    JACKSON FAMILY CHARITABLE TRUST
    one grant, 2021 · $50k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2024 · $45k
  • GY
    GESHER YEHUDA INC
    one grant, 2024 · $26k · revenue +21%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Sherit Isroel
—
2
Congregation Beth-El Sephardic Center of Jamaica Estates

Congregation beth-el sephardic center of jamaica estates is a religious institution

Religion
3
Yeshiva Ohr Yisroel
Philanthropy
4
Zohar Hatorah Inc

Religious School

Religion
5
American Friends of Shviti Hashem Inc

To support and promote the study of torah (bible) among members of jewish faith worldwide.

Religion
6
University of Judaism Foundation
—
7
Ohel Avraham

Support for jewish educational programs

International
8
Tal Hashamayim Foundation
Religion
9
Sephardic Foundation for Torah Studies Inc

To promote, encourage, foster and advance the teaching and study of the sephardic jewish religion.

Education
10
Shaarei Halacha Inc
Philanthropy
11
Chasdei Dovid Elimelech Inc
Philanthropy
12
Sephardic Institute Sephardic Institute for Advanced Learning

Our mission is to provide religious services, instruction and understanding of Judaism within the Orthodox Jewish religion and rational thought to the Jewish community with a stress on the Sephardic Jewish tradition.

Religion
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Sephardic Bikur Holim Fund in Memory of Joseph D Beyda Inc; the most unlike its peers is The Hesed Fund. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

39 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 39 of the 107 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
10
Early backer (in before they grew)
36/39
Grantees still filing
19/39
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

KOL YAAKOV INC: $92,000 · OtherKOL YAAKOV INCJACKSON FAMILY CHARITABLE TRUST: $50,000 · OtherJACKSON FAMILY CHARITABLE TRUSTIndividual grant recipient: $45,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientLARCHWOOD SYNAGOGUE INC: $38,072 · OtherLARCHWOOD SYNAGOGUE INCUCEF: $36,000 · OtherTEACHNJ: $31,200 · OtherHELPING HEARTS CHARITABLE FOUNDATION: $30,000 · OtherRABBI JACOB S KASSIN CHESED FUND: $26,452 · OtherGESHER YEHUDA INC: $26,000 · OtherRENEWAL: $23,900 · Other+73 more: $305,084 · Other+73 moreTHE SEPHARDIC FOOD FUND INC: $276,600 · Food & NutritionTHE SEPHARDIC FOOD …THE KESHER ORGANIZATION INC: $146,000 · ReligionTHE KESHER ORGANI…TORAH LEARNING RESOURCES LTD: $35,700 · ReligionTORAH LEARNING RE…BNEI MELACHIM INC: $32,500 · ReligionBNEI MELACHIM INCKINYAN TORAH INC: $18,000 · ReligionKINYAN TORAH INCSEPHARDIC MIKVEH OF MIDWOOD INC: $10,000 · Religion+4 more: $4,101 · ReligionSBH COMMUNITY SERVICE NETWORK INC: $200,000 · Human ServicesSBH COMMUNITY …+2 more: $4,800 · Human ServicesTHE SEPHARDIC HERITAGE MUSEUM INC: $59,600 · Arts & CultureILAN-LAEL INC DBA ILAN-LAEL FOUNDATION: $30,000 · Arts & CultureTHE LEGACY FOUNDATION: $7,600 · Arts & CultureTHE SEPHARDIC BIKUR HOLIM FUND IN MEMORY OF JOSEPH D BEYDA INC: $37,804 · HealthNew York Cancer Center Inc: $6,200 · HealthSIMHA ORGANIZATION INC: $1,800 · Health+1 more: $1,002 · HealthTHE HESED FUND: $15,000 · PhilanthropyJEWISH COMMUNAL FUND: $12,500 · PhilanthropyCHAI AHME INC: $2,600 · PhilanthropyMAGEN CHAYAL INC: $1,800 · Philanthropy
Other$703,708Food & Nutrition$276,600Religion$246,301Human Services$204,800Arts & Culture$97,200Health$46,806Philanthropy$31,900

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE SEPHARDIC FOOD FUND INC: $276,600 over 4y, 3.2% of budgetSBH COMMUNITY SERVICE NETWORK INC: $200,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetTHE KESHER ORGANIZATION INC: $146,000 over 3y, 6.3% of budgetTHE SEPHARDIC HERITAGE MUSEUM INC: $59,600 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetTHE SEPHARDIC BIKUR HOLIM FUND IN MEMORY OF JOSEPH D BEYDA INC: $37,804 over 4y, 8.9% of budgetTORAH LEARNING RESOURCES LTD: $35,700 over 3y, 5.0% of budgetBNEI MELACHIM INC: $32,500 over 4y, 6.0% of budgetILAN-LAEL INC DBA ILAN-LAEL FOUNDATION: $30,000 over 3y, 2.6% of budgetGESHER YEHUDA INC: $26,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetKINYAN TORAH INC: $18,000 over 1y, 6.2% of budgetJEWISH COMMUNAL FUND: $12,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSEPHARDIC MIKVEH OF MIDWOOD INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetUNITED NATIONS WATCH - USA: $8,600 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetTHE BROWNSTONE EXPERIENCE FOUNDATIO: $7,600 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetFUND FOR ISRAEL'S TOMORROW: $7,500 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetNew York Cancer Center Inc: $6,200 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetIMAGINE ACADEMY: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetKETER SHLOMO FOUNDATION INC: $3,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetCHAI AHME INC: $2,600 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetSEPHARDIC COMMUNITY YOUTH CENTER INC: $2,600 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetShuvi Nafshi Foundation INC: $2,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetSIMHA ORGANIZATION INC: $1,800 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetLIFE VEST INSIDE INC: $1,800 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetMAGEN CHAYAL INC: $1,800 over 1y, 2.1% of budgetCHAI LIFELINE INC: $1,002 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE NEXT STEP: $1,002 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTorat Shraga Inc: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFOUNDATION FOR SEPHARDIC STUDIES: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCONGREGATION MAGEN DAVID OF MANHATTAN: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBET YAAKOV OZ VEHADAR INC: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMAOR YESHIVA HIGH SCHOOL INC: $101 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGATES OF ZION INC: $101 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE SEPHARDIC FOOD FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds SBH COMMUNITY SERVICE NETWORK INC ↗
  • Who funds THE KESHER ORGANIZATION INC ↗
  • Who funds THE SEPHARDIC HERITAGE MUSEUM INC ↗
  • Who funds THE SEPHARDIC BIKUR HOLIM FUND IN MEMORY OF JOSEPH D BEYDA INC ↗
  • Who funds TORAH LEARNING RESOURCES LTD ↗
  • Who funds BNEI MELACHIM INC ↗
  • Who funds ILAN-LAEL INC DBA ILAN-LAEL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds GESHER YEHUDA INC ↗
  • Who funds KINYAN TORAH INC ↗
  • Who funds THE HESED FUND ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH COMMUNAL FUND ↗
  • Who funds SEPHARDIC MIKVEH OF MIDWOOD INC ↗
  • Who funds UNITED NATIONS WATCH - USA ↗
  • Who funds THE BROWNSTONE EXPERIENCE FOUNDATIO ↗
  • Who funds THE LEGACY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds FUND FOR ISRAEL'S TOMORROW ↗
  • Who funds New York Cancer Center Inc ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jack Adjmi Family Fou…The Howard Hoffman & …Jewish Communal FundThe Ralph S Gindi Fam…Isaac & Marjorie Gind…Cabasso Family Founda…The Mamiye Foundation…Albert & Melissa Sutt…The Amin and Lillian …Ralph J Harary Founda…E R G FoundationAltoon Sutton Memoria…
Jack Adjmi Family Foundation IncNY53.3× affinity26 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jack Adjmi Family Foundation Inc · The Howard Hoffman & Sons Foundation Inc · Jewish Communal Fund · The Ralph S Gindi Family Foundation · Isaac & Marjorie Gindi Foundation Inc · Cabasso Family Foundation · The Mamiye Foundation Inc · Albert & Melissa Sutton Foundation · The Amin and Lillian Adjmi Foundation · Ralph J Harary Foundation Inc · E R G Foundation · Altoon Sutton Memorial Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Isaac J Chehebar Charitable Trust Isaac J Chehebar Trustee funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Isaac J Chehebar Charitable Trust Isaac J Chehebar Trustee. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 50%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    5get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Isaac J Chehebar Charitable Trust Isaac J Chehebar Trustee?

    Find your warmest path to Isaac J Chehebar Charitable Trust Isaac J Chehebar Trustee through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 107 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Isaac J Chehebar Charitable Trust Isaac J Chehebar Trustee’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home