Skip to content

· Private foundation

Isaac & Marjorie Gindi Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$779k
Granted FY2025still arriving
143
Grants FY2025still arriving
7
States reached
$90k
Largest
01What it funds
0179% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Religion$1.9MHuman Services$431kHealth$362kYouth Development$293kInternational$257kArts & Culture$190kEducation$111kFood & Nutrition$93kOther$0
02FY2025 · 143 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k119 grants · $265k
  • $10k–50k21 grants · $364k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $190k
$2,500
Median grant
7
States reached
$1.6M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$89,812
SHAARE ZION$50,000
REACH FOR THE STARS$50,000
HAHAIM YESHIVAT SHALOM INC$40,000
Individual grant recipient$37,953
FRIENDS OF UNITED HATZALAH$27,000
SHORE AREA MIKVEH$20,834
AMERICAN FRIENDS OF SHEHEBAR SEPHARDIC CENTER$19,800
RENEWAL$18,900
Individual grant recipient$18,000
YDE (YESHIVAT DARCHE ERES INC)$18,000
SEPHARDIC DIVISION OF MEDICAL CHAIM$18,000
SEPHARDIC BIKUR HOLIM$15,500
CARE FOR SPECIAL NEEDS CHILDREN FOUNDATION INC$15,200
SEPHARDIC FOOD FUND$15,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $196k) land where the poverty rate runs at 18%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 96% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%MY SOLDIER: $2k → 6%ISRAEL MEDICAL FUND: $3k → 17%EZER ELIYAHU: $2k → 10%THE SPECIAL CHILDREN'S CENTER: $14k → 11%THE SPECIAL CHILDREN'S CENTER: $12k → 11%LARGER THAN LIFE USA: $2k → 13%MISASKIM: $5k → 20%KEREN HATZEDAKA: $52 → 11%BONEI OLAM: $3k → 20%BONEI OLAM: $3k → 20%BONEI OLAM: $3k → 20%BONEI OLAM: $2k → 20%BONEI OLAM: $2k → 20%BONEI OLAM: $2k → 20%MISASKIM: $1k → 20%KAREN ANIYEM: $1k → 20%ATIME: $5k → 20%KEREN ANIYIM: $500 → 20%A TIME: $3k → 20%MICHAEL KAMEO FOUNDATION: $1k → 6%AHAVAT HAIM VACHESED: $3k → 6%SEPHARDIC BIKUR HOLIM: $36k → 20%BEER MIRIAM CHARITABLE FOUNDATION: $17k → 20%SEPHARDIC BIKUR HOLIM: $16k → 20%CARE FOR SPECIAL NEEDS CHILDREN FOUNDATION INC: $15k → 20%SEPHARDIC BIKUR HOLIM: $11k → 20%SEPHARDIC BIKUR HOLIM: $10k → 20%CARE FOR SPECIAL NEEDS CHILDREN FOUNDATION INC: $3k → 20%EMAHOT FOUNDATION: $2k → 20%EMAHOT FOUNDATION: $2k → 20%THE DEBORAH SALEM FOUNDATION: $1k → 17%THE DEBORAH SALEM FOUNDATION: $500 → 17%EMAHOT FOUNDATION: $2k → 20%SEPHARDIC BIKUR HOLIM: $2k → 20%THE HEBREW FREE LOAN SOCIETY: $5k → 17%ATIME: $1k → 20%OTSAR FAMILY SERVICES: $1k → 20%EMAHOT FOUNDATION: $1k → 20%MY SOLDIER: $350 → 20%BONEI OLAM: $3k → 20%BONEI OLAM: $3k → 20%COMMUNITY ASSISTANCE FUND: $1k → 20%WE LOVE TO HELP INC: $180 → 20%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
NY
MA
OR
NV
OH
PA
NJ
CT
CA
VA
MD
TN
SC
OK
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

85%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$4.3M · 165 repeat orgs$776k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +22% since the first grant, against +3% for those funded once.

165 repeat relationships: 87 still active in FY2025, 78 since wound down; 56 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

165
200

Total granted

$4.3M
$566k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+22%
+3%

Still filing today

33%
25%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 74% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $210k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
ReligionEducationHuman ServicesInternationalPhilanthropyYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TR
    THE RECORDED TALMUD
    5× · 2018–2023 · $228k · revenue +4%
  • SC
    SEPHARDIC COMMUNITY YOUTH CENTER INC
    4× · 2021–2024 · $166k · revenue +118%
  • FO
    FRIENDS OF UNITED HATZALAH INC
    6× · 2017–2025 · $131k · revenue +383%

Funded once

  • RF
    REACH FOR THE STARS LEARNING CENTER
    one grant, 2024 · $50k · revenue +21%
  • TR
    THE RABBI JACOB KASSIN HESSED FUND
    one grant, 2024 · $26k
  • NY
    New York Universitygraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $25k · revenue +76%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Yeshiva Ohr Yisroel
Philanthropy
2
Sherit Isroel
—
3
American Friends of Yeshiva Aish Hatorah
—
4
Chasdei Dovid Elimelech Inc
Philanthropy
5
Tal Hashamayim Foundation
Religion
6
American Friends of Amshinover Yeshiva Jerusalem Inc

Support of religious schools in Israel

International
7
Tomchei Torah Inc

Religious Teaching

—
8
Yad Yosef Foundation
Philanthropy
9
Shaarei Halacha Inc
Philanthropy
10
The Keren Rachaim Fund
—
11
American Friends of Yeshivat Nachalat Yossef

The organization will provide financial assistance to educational institutions that promote the observance of the jewish religion, its laws and traditions, and sacred texts, including yeshivat nachalat yossef, located in jerusalem, israel.

Religion
12
Tzemach Yifroch Foundation
—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Pfap Foundation Inc; the most unlike its peers is Ezra Cornman Bar Mitzvah Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

122 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 122 of the 422 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
20
Early backer (in before they grew)
116/122
Grantees still filing
64/122
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $446,713 · OtherIndividual grant recipientREACH FOR THE STARS: $360,000 · OtherREACH FOR THE STARSIndividual grant recipient: $230,418 · OtherIndividual grant recipientTHE RECORDED TALMUD: $228,000 · OtherTHE RECORDED TALMUD+151 more: $2,277,161 · Other+151 moreHAHAIM YESHIVAT SHALOM INC: $297,000 · EducationHAHAIM YE…REACH FOR THE STARS LEARNING CENTER: $50,000 · EducationREACH FOR…New York University: $25,000 · EducationNew York …ILAN HIGH SCHOOL: $14,000 · Education+5 more: $21,000 · EducationSEPHARDIC COMMUNITY YOUTH CENTER INC: $165,606 · Youth DevelopmentAmerican Friends of Migdal OHR: $121,600 · Youth DevelopmentILEAD EXPERIENCE INC: $13,000 · Youth Development+1 more: $8,800 · Youth DevelopmentSBH COMMUNITY SERVICE NETWORK INC: $73,300 · Human ServicesTHE SPECIAL CHILDREN CENTER: $25,400 · Human ServicesBonei Olam Inc: $18,400 · Human ServicesCARE FOR SPECIAL NEEDS CHILDREN FOUNDATION INC: $17,800 · Human ServicesBEER MIRIAM CHARITABLE FOUNDATION: $17,482 · Human ServicesA Torah Infertilty Medium Exchange: $9,000 · Human ServicesEMAHOT FOUNDATION INC: $6,800 · Human ServicesMISASKIM CORP: $6,000 · Human Services+1 more: $5,000 · Human ServicesShuvi Nafshi Foundation INC: $30,200 · ReligionTHE KESHER ORGANIZATION INC: $30,200 · ReligionKEREN YOM TOV INC: $12,800 · ReligionTORAH LEARNING RESOURCES LTD: $10,000 · ReligionKETER ARAM TZOVA INC: $9,500 · ReligionSHAARE MORDECHAI INC: $9,000 · ReligionAISH GLOBAL INC: $9,000 · ReligionAMERICAN FRIENDS OF LMAN ACHAI INC: $7,800 · ReligionCONGREGATION RODFEH ZEDEK INC: $6,600 · ReligionSEPHARDIC COMMUNITY ALLIANCE: $5,200 · Religion+3 more: $11,200 · ReligionFRIENDS OF UNITED HATZALAH INC: $131,400 · Arts & CultureTHE SEPHARDIC HERITAGE MUSEUM INC: $8,900 · Arts & CultureAMERICAN FRIENDS OF SHEHEBAR SEPHARDIC CENTER INC: $63,660 · InternationalCARMEI HA'IR INTERNATIONAL: $25,600 · InternationalBIRTHRIGHT ISRAEL FOUNDATION: $18,000 · InternationalYAD DAVID INC: $12,500 · InternationalFRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES: $7,200 · InternationalCentral Fund of Israel: $6,200 · International+2 more: $5,600 · International
Other$3,542,292Education$407,000Youth Development$309,006Human Services$179,182Religion$141,500Arts & Culture$140,300International$138,760

Showing the 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetHAHAIM YESHIVAT SHALOM INC: $297,000 over 8y, 7.2% of budgetTHE RECORDED TALMUD: $228,000 over 5y, 10% of budgetSEPHARDIC COMMUNITY YOUTH CENTER INC: $165,606 over 4y, 1.4% of budgetFRIENDS OF UNITED HATZALAH INC: $131,400 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Friends of Migdal OHR: $121,600 over 5y, 0.5% of budgetSIMHA ORGANIZATION INC: $107,200 over 4y, 3.5% of budgetTHE SEPHARDIC FOOD FUND INC: $87,800 over 6y, 0.7% of budgetSBH COMMUNITY SERVICE NETWORK INC: $73,300 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetCENTURY 21 ASSOCIATES FOUNDATION INC: $71,250 over 2y, 1.9% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF SHEHEBAR SEPHARDIC CENTER INC: $63,660 over 6y, 1.5% of budgetREACH FOR THE STARS LEARNING CENTER: $50,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetTHE FRANCO FOUNDATION: $32,600 over 4y, 6.7% of budgetShuvi Nafshi Foundation INC: $30,200 over 4y, 0.9% of budgetTHE KESHER ORGANIZATION INC: $30,200 over 5y, 0.8% of budgetTHE SPECIAL CHILDREN CENTER: $25,400 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetNew York University: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NEW YORK INC: $20,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBonei Olam Inc: $18,400 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetBIRTHRIGHT ISRAEL FOUNDATION: $18,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCARE FOR SPECIAL NEEDS CHILDREN FOUNDATION INC: $17,800 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTHE MIRYAM INSTITUTE INC: $17,600 over 6y, 0.5% of budgetBEER MIRIAM CHARITABLE FOUNDATION: $17,482 over 1y, 6.7% of budgetTHE NETANYA FOUNDATION INC: $15,000 over 2y, 1.4% of budgetILAN HIGH SCHOOL: $14,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetILEAD EXPERIENCE INC: $13,000 over 4y, 0.8% of budgetKEREN YOM TOV INC: $12,800 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetFRIENDS OF AHAVATH SHALOM INC: $12,600 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetYAD DAVID INC: $12,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTORAH LEARNING RESOURCES LTD: $10,000 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetKETER ARAM TZOVA INC: $9,500 over 2y, 1.3% of budgetA Torah Infertilty Medium Exchange: $9,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetSHAARE MORDECHAI INC: $9,000 over 3y, 1.2% of budgetAISH GLOBAL INC: $9,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE SEPHARDIC HERITAGE MUSEUM INC: $8,900 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetDEAL SEPHARDIC YOUTH CENTER INC: $8,800 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF LMAN ACHAI INC: $7,800 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES: $7,200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHAI LIFELINE INC: $6,952 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetEMAHOT FOUNDATION INC: $6,800 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetCONGREGATION RODFEH ZEDEK INC: $6,600 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetCentral Fund of Israel: $6,200 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMISASKIM CORP: $6,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetSEPHARDIC COMMUNITY ALLIANCE: $5,200 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetSAFE FOUNDATION INC: $5,200 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetISRAEL CANCER RESEARCH FUND INC: $5,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetHEBREW FREE LOAN SOCIETY INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetWOMEN'S LEAGUE COMMUNITY RESIDENCES: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF ARAM SOBA: $4,400 over 2y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds HAHAIM YESHIVAT SHALOM INC ↗
  • Who funds THE RECORDED TALMUD ↗
  • Who funds SEPHARDIC COMMUNITY YOUTH CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF UNITED HATZALAH INC ↗
  • Who funds American Friends of Migdal OHR ↗
  • Who funds SIMHA ORGANIZATION INC ↗
  • Who funds THE SEPHARDIC FOOD FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds SBH COMMUNITY SERVICE NETWORK INC ↗
  • Who funds CENTURY 21 ASSOCIATES FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF SHEHEBAR SEPHARDIC CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds REACH FOR THE STARS LEARNING CENTER ↗
  • Who funds THE FRANCO FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Shuvi Nafshi Foundation INC ↗
  • Who funds THE KESHER ORGANIZATION INC ↗
  • Who funds CARMEI HA'IR INTERNATIONAL ↗
  • Who funds THE SPECIAL CHILDREN CENTER ↗
  • Who funds New York University ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jack Adjmi Family Foundation IncNY144.9× affinity97 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jack Adjmi Family Foundation Inc · E R G Foundation · Ralph J Harary Foundation Inc · The Setton Foundation · The Howard Hoffman & Sons Foundation Inc · The Ralph S Gindi Family Foundation · Chehebar Family Foundation · The Amin and Lillian Adjmi Foundation · Cabasso Family Foundation · The Jimmy and Berta Khezrie Charitable Foundation · The Adjmi-Dwek Foundation Inc · I Chera & Sons Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Isaac & Marjorie Gindi Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Isaac & Marjorie Gindi Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 260%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →median 8%
  • Bet Yaakov of the Jersey Shore Inc: 9% of income from government
  • Yeshiva Keter Torah Inc: 8% of income from government
  • The Special Children Center: 5% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
26get no government money at all
12report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Isaac & Marjorie Gindi Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to Isaac & Marjorie Gindi Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 422 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Isaac & Marjorie Gindi’s filings →

More from the funding graph