· Public charity
Iraqi Children Foundation Inc
To intervene with love and hope in the lives of iraqi children who are vulnerable to abuse, neglect, and exploitation by extremists, criminals, and human traffickers.
Where the money goes
Grants by size, and the largest recipients.
By grant size · FY2023
- $50k–250k1 grant · $108k
- $250k+1 grant · $502k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Individual grant recipient | $502,279 |
| IRAQ HEALTH ACCESS ORGANIZATI | $107,935 |
Where the grant dollars land
Across the US and around the world.
US giving: 0% of grant dollars ($0). The 100% that went abroad ($610k) is mapped below.
Beyond the US: 100% of all-years giving ($610k)
1 country, by the recipient’s country on the filing.
Grants abroad, by region: $709k on the FY2024 return
Schedule F, as filed: 1 region. The IRS asks for region and purpose, not the recipient, so no country or grantee can be named here.
Stated purpose: Humanitarian Aid
How this is measured
0 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2023–2023.
Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.
How this is measured
Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2023 to 2023, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 0 of the 2 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.
Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding
A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Iraqi Children Foundation Inc?
Find your warmest path to Iraqi Children Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.
Play a game based on Iraqi Children’s filings →