Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Ionetix Ppe Foundation

$4.0M
Granted FY2021
12
Grants FY2021
9
States reached
$817k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20202021.

Health$6.5MEducation$899k
02FY2021 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2021

  • Under $10k1 grant · $7k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $40k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $190k
  • $250k+7 grants · $3.8M
$486,000
Median grant
9
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
NOTRE DAME UNIVERSITY$817,000
BAPTIST HOSPITAL OF SOUTH EAST TEXAS$545,943
NORTHEAST GEORGIA MEDICAL CENTER$486,000
LEE HEALTH$486,000
BAYLOR UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTET$486,000
BAPTIST HEALTH JACKSONVILLE$486,000
JFK HOSPITAL$447,600
HENRY FORD HEALTHCARE SYSTEM$140,000
REGION ONE HEALTHCARE$50,000
ARCHBOLD FOUNDATION$23,276
ADVENTIST HEALTH$16,500
BOSTON MEDICAL CENTER$7,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY20–21) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 75% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 13%UNIV OF MASSACHUSETTS MEM HOSPITAL: $166k → 11%BOSTON MEDICAL CENTER: $495k → 16%SAN FRANCISCO VA HOSPITAL: $75k → 10%UNIV OF SOUTHERN CALIF: $1.6M → 14%NEW YORK CITY HEALTH: $300k → 17%BAYLOR UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTET: $486k → 14%BAPTIST HOSPITAL OF SOUTH EAST TEXAS: $546k → 19%LEE HEALTH: $486k → 11%BAPTIST HEALTH JACKSONVILLE: $486k → 14%LAKELAND REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER: $54k → 16%HENRY FORD HEALTHCARE SYSTEM: $140k → 21%REGION ONE HEALTHCARE: $50k → 17%NORTHEAST GEORGIA MEDICAL CENTER: $486k → 12%ARCHBOLD FOUNDATION: $23k → 20%NOTRE DAME UNIVERSITY: $817k → 13%JFK HOSPITAL: $448k → 8%BOSTON MEDICAL CENTER: $7k → 16%ADVENTIST HEALTH: $17k → 14%BAYLOR UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTET: $54k → 14%BAPTIST HOSPITAL OF SOUTH EAST TEXAS: $54k → 19%LEE HEALTH: $54k → 11%BAPTIST HEALTH JACKSONVILLE: $50k → 14%DAVENPORT MEDICAL CENTER: $163k → 16%HENRY FORD HEALTHCARE SYSTEM: $15k → 21%REGION ONE HEALTHCARE: $15k → 17%NORTHEAST GEORGIA MEDICAL CENTER: $54k → 12%NOTRE DAME UNIVERSITY: $82k → 13%JFK HOSPITAL: $54k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

MI
NY
MA
IN
NJ
CA
TN
GA
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

61%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$4.0M · 9 repeat orgs$2.5M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +60% since the first grant, against +56% for the ones you funded once.

9 repeat relationships — 9 still active in FY2021, 0 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2021 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
7

Total granted

$4.0M
$2.5M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+60%
+56%

Still filing today

44%
14%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2021, 99% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $40k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BH
    Baptist Hospitals of Southeast Texas
    2× · 2020–2021 · $600k · revenue +56%
  • NG
    NORTHEAST GEORGIA MEDICAL CENTER INC
    2× · 2020–2021 · $540k · revenue +60%
  • BU
    Baylor University Medical Center
    2× · 2020–2021 · $540k · revenue +73%

Funded once

  • UO
    UNIV OF SOUTHERN CALIF
    one grant, 2020 · $1.6M
  • NY
    NEW YORK CITY HEALTH
    one grant, 2020 · $300k
  • UO
    UNIV OF MASSACHUSETTS MEM HOSPITAL
    one grant, 2020 · $166k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field
04the grantee network

7 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 7 of the 19 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
7/7
Grantees still filing
7/7
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

UNIV OF SOUTHERN CALIF — $1,637,200 · OtherUNIV OF SOUTHERN CALIFLEE HEALTH — $540,400 · OtherLEE HEALTHBAPTIST HEALTH JACKSONVILLE — $536,400 · OtherBAPTIST HEALTH JACKSONVILLEJFK HOSPITAL — $502,000 · OtherJFK HOSPITALNEW YORK CITY HEALTH — $300,000 · OtherNEW YORK CITY HEALTHUNIV OF MASSACHUSETTS MEM HOSPITAL — $165,886 · OtherDAVENPORT MEDICAL CENTER — $163,150 · OtherHENRY FORD HEALTHCARE SYSTEM — $155,000 · Other+4 more — $269,000 · Other+4 moreBaptist Hospitals of Southeast Texas — $600,343 · HealthBaptist Hospitals of Southeast Tex…NORTHEAST GEORGIA MEDICAL CENTER INC — $540,400 · HealthNORTHEAST GEORGIA MEDICAL CENTER I…Baylor University Medical Center — $540,400 · HealthBaylor University Medical CenterBOSTON MEDICAL CENTER CORPORATION — $502,000 · HealthBOSTON MEDICAL CENTER CORPORATION+2 more — $77,676 · HealthUniversity of Notre Dame du Lac — $898,800 · EducationUniversity of…
Other$4,269,036Health$2,260,819Education$898,800

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetUniversity of Notre Dame du Lac — $898,800 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBaptist Hospitals of Southeast Texas — $600,343 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetNORTHEAST GEORGIA MEDICAL CENTER INC — $540,400 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBaylor University Medical Center — $540,400 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBOSTON MEDICAL CENTER CORPORATION — $502,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetLakeland Regional Medical Center Inc — $54,400 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetARCHBOLD FOUNDATION INC — $23,276 over 1y, 0.5% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds University of Notre Dame du Lac
  • Who funds Baptist Hospitals of Southeast Texas
  • Who funds NORTHEAST GEORGIA MEDICAL CENTER INC
  • Who funds Baylor University Medical Center
  • Who funds BOSTON MEDICAL CENTER CORPORATION
  • Who funds Lakeland Regional Medical Center Inc
  • Who funds ARCHBOLD FOUNDATION INC

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Ionetix Ppe Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 23%
  • Boston Medical Center Corporation23% of income from government
  • Lakeland Regional Medical Center Inc0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 19 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2021, released 2021. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph