· Public charity
Intl Brotherhood of Teamsters Local 174
The local union's mission is to organize and educate workers so that they have a voice in the workplace and know their workplace rights; involve workers in the political process and to negotiate with employers so that each worker is treated with dignity, justice, and respect.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 5 grants below total $47,500 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $103,347 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $55,847 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k1 grant · $7k
- $10k–50k4 grants · $41k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Teamsters Local Union No 117 | $11,000 |
| Teamsters Scholarship Fund | $10,000 |
| Sisterhood of 174 | $10,000 |
| Teamsters Local Union No 25 | $10,000 |
| Teamsters Joint Council No42 | $6,500 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 54% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +37% since the first grant, against +29% for the ones you funded once.
4 repeat relationships — 4 still active in FY2025, 0 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 86% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $7k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- IBINTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF TEAMSTERS SCHOLARSHIP FUND INC2× · 2023–2025 · $70k · revenue -18%
- TUTEAMSTERS UNION LOCAL 25 AFFILIATED WITH IBT4× · 2019–2025 · $50k · revenue +37%
- IBINTL BROTHERHOOD OF TEAMSTERS LOCAL 1172× · 2019–2025 · $21k · revenue +45%
Funded once
- TLTeamsters Local 174 All Charities Fundgraduatedone grant, 2023 · $34k · revenue +56% · 100% of their budget
- SDSOFT DRNKSBWERY WRKRS & DELVRY EMPL IND'L EMP WRHMEN HLPR & MISC L812 IBTone grant, 2017 · $10k · revenue +4%
- IAINTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF FIRE FIGHTERS 10066 BOEING FIRE FIGHTERSone grant, 2024 · $10k · revenue +31%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To organize all workers for the economic, moral and social advancement of their condition and status.
To organize workers for their moral, economic and social advancement.
Labor organization for various industries; ensuring fair wages and proper benefits for its members.
Labor union
To organize clerical employees of the university of california system in order to secure fair wages and better working conditions.
Labor Union
The organization is a local teamsters union whose mission is to represent their union members in negotioations with employers.
The primary mission of the union is to organize employees and negotiate contracts on their behalf covering wages, benefits, hours, and conditions of employment in accordance with the laws, usages, and requirements of the ibt, and in…
Labor organization
The local union's mission is to organize and educate workers so that they have a voice in the workplace and know their workplace rights; involve workers in the political process and to negotiate with employers so that each worker is…
The local union's mission is to organize and educate workers so that they have a voice in the workplace and know their workplace rights; involve workers in the political process and to negotiate with employers so that each worker is…
To organize workers and to secure improved wages, benefits and working conditions.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is International Brotherhood of Teamsters and the most unlike its peers is Teamsters Local 174 All Charities Fund. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 16 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF TEAMSTERS SCHOLARSHIP FUND INC ↗
- Who funds TEAMSTERS UNION LOCAL 25 AFFILIATED WITH IBT ↗
- Who funds Teamsters Local 174 All Charities Fund ↗
- Who funds INTL BROTHERHOOD OF TEAMSTERS LOCAL 117 ↗
- Who funds SOFT DRNKSBWERY WRKRS & DELVRY EMPL IND'L EMP WRHMEN HLPR & MISC L812 IBT ↗
- Who funds INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF FIRE FIGHTERS 10066 BOEING FIRE FIGHTERS ↗
- Who funds INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF TEAMSTERS ↗
- Who funds General Teamsters Local Union No 231 ↗
- Who funds INTL BROTHERHOOD OF TEAMSTERS LOCAL 313 ↗
- Who funds INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF TEAMSTERS 431 ↗
- Who funds SEIU HEALTHCARE 1199NW AND SUBSIDIARY ↗
- Who funds WORKER SOLIDARITY AND DEFENSE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds International Brotherhood of Teamsters ↗
- Who funds The Southern California & Southern Nevada Teamsters JC 42 Charity Fund Inc ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a set of overlaps that mostly run through you, not between each other.
Open a dossier: Joint Council of Teamsters No 28
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Intl Brotherhood of Teamsters Local 174 funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.