How much did Intl Brotherhood of Electrical Workers grant in FY2024?

Intl Brotherhood of Electrical Workers reported 9 grants totaling $301,077 in its FY2024 IRS filing.

Where is Intl Brotherhood of Electrical Workers based?

Intl Brotherhood of Electrical Workers is based in WA.

Intl Brotherhood of Electrical Workers

Foundation Dossiers Also receives grants — funding profile →

· Public charity

Intl Brotherhood of Electrical Workers

To organize workers in the electrical industry, including public utilities and manufacturing, into local unions, promote reasonable methods of work, settle disputes between employers and employees by arbitration, assist members, reduce hours, secure adequate pay for work, seek a higher standard of living for members, seek security for…

$301k

Granted FY2024

Grants

Communities

$100k

Largest

01What you fund

What you funded, over time

By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 90% of Intl Brotherhood of Electrical Workers’s grantee dollars go to organizations outside the IRS cause taxonomy (common for large international and research funders), so a chart would be mostly “unclassified” and misrepresent the portfolio.

02beneath the categories

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.

…and in their own words, year by year

2018

—

2019

political

2020

—

2021

building

2022

womenempowertradesmentoring

2023

ibew pac

Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.

03FY2024 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

Under $10k4 grants · $25k
$10k–50k4 grants · $79k
$50k–250k1 grant · $100k

$10,000

Median grant

States reached

$21M

Total assets

Largest grants

IBEW- Political Action Committee$100,460
WA St Democratic Central Comm$30,000
IBEW$28,955
Electrcl Wrks Minority Caucus$10,000
No on 2117 Committee$10,000
Washington Women in Trades$7,900
Kent Station Retail LLC$6,000
Electrical Workers 46 PAC$6,000
IBEW LOCAL 77$5,500

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY22–22, $10k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9% — the area typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

77%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$828k · 9 repeat orgs$244k to everyone else

9 repeat relationships — 6 still active in FY2024, 3 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$828k

$194k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+14%

+125%

Still filing today

56%

31%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 76% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $50k went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

EmploymentCommunity ImprovementHuman ServicesEducationCrime & LegalOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

I
IBEW
2× · 2023–2024 · $57k · revenue +14%
SA
Sound Alliance
5× · 2017–2021 · $50k · revenue +5%
WI
WSAEW-CO IBEW LOCAL 77
3× · 2021–2024 · $17k · revenue +45%

Funded once

IC
IBEW COPE
one grant, 2017 · $48k
TE
Tribal Electric LLC
one grant, 2023 · $21k
WW
Washington Works for US PAC
one grant, 2017 · $20k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

International Brotherhood of

Labor union - electrical workers

—

International Brotherhood of Electrical

Electrical workers 760 was chartered on may 4th, 1925. we aim: - to pursue and establish and maintain an adequate wage for our labor. - to require of our members skill, intelligence, and character. - to protect our employer agents against…

—

International Brotherhood of

To coordinate the political and legislative effort of local unions

Employment

International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers Local 606

The Union and its employees work for the benefit of its membership including negotiations of wages, benefits, and working conditions.

—

International Brotherhood of

To organize all electrical workers in the construction industry, to promote goodwill among all of those in our trade, to assist each other in sickness and in distress, to secure employment for our members, to secure adequate pay for our…

—

International Brotherhood of Electrical

Labor Organizing

—

Intl Brotherhood of Electrical Workers

To organize workers in the electrical industry, settle disputes between employers and employees by arbitration, reduce hours, secure adequate pay for work, seek a higher standard of living for members, seek security for members, by legal…

—

Intl Brotherhood of Electrical Workers

—

International Brotherhood of

Electrical workers 270 was charted on july 1, 1952. we aim: to pursue and establish and maintain an adequate wage for our labor. to require of our members skill, intelligence and character. to protect our employers against the unskilled…

—

Intl Brotherhood of Electrical Workers

To provide the members of the local electrical union with services and benefits.

—

International Brotherhood of Electrical

To organize all workers and secure improved compensation and working conditions thru collective bargaining

—

Intl Brotherhood of Electrical Workers

The international brotherhood of electrical workers local 340 is the collective bargaining agent for persons employed by union shops in the related industry. as a member supported organization, the majority of income is generated by dues…

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Apprenticeship and Nontraditional and the most unlike its peers is Washington Women in Trades Association. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

05the grantee network

12 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2024.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

11/12

Grantees still filing

9/12

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Other$969,081Community Improvement$50,000Employment$29,700Human Services$10,000Education$8,000Crime & Legal$5,200

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a set of overlaps that mostly run through you, not between each other.

Seattle FoundationWA12.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Seattle Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation Intl Brotherhood of Electrical Workers funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024

’20’21’22’23’24

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

1get no government money at all

0rely on government for over half their income

⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%

typical government reliance, FY20–24

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: Washington Women in Trades.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

insufficient risk

Limited financial data in public filings.

Track record & reputation

medium risk

2 years of Form 990 filings, still active.

Legal standing

low risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 911951301 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on Washington Women in Trades, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

Awaiting reportFinancial stability— Runway not derivable from filings.
On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2023; revenue grew over the period.
On trackReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 16% of their budget — diversified.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to Intl Brotherhood of Electrical Workers?

Find your warmest path to Intl Brotherhood of Electrical Workers through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

Intl Brotherhood of Electrical Workers

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

12 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2024.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Intl Brotherhood of Electrical Workers?

More from the funding graph

Intl Brotherhood of Electrical Workers

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

12 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2024.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Intl Brotherhood of Electrical Workers?

More from the funding graph