· Public charity
International Vaccine Institute
To discover, develop and deliver safe, effective and affordable vaccines for global public health.
What it funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.
Where the money goes
Grants by size, and the largest recipients.
How this is measured
By grant size · FY2024
- $10k–50k2 grants · $80k
- $50k–250k7 grants · $1.0M
- $250k+4 grants · $2.4M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| ICON GOV'T & PUBLIC HEALTH SOLUTIONS | $1,543,955 |
| University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill | $313,078 |
| The Trustees of the University of Pennsylvania | $301,290 |
| TEXAS TECH UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCE | $285,000 |
| REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA | $197,070 |
| EDJEN BIOTECH LLC | $165,000 |
| MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL | $161,049 |
| THE JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY | $150,000 |
| PRES & FELLOWS OF HARVARD COLLEGE | $139,555 |
| BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL | $125,334 |
| New York University | $78,355 |
| UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON | $40,000 |
| UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND | $39,960 |
Does the money reach high-need areas?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.
Its human-services grants (FY17–18, $103k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
How this is measured
Which US states its grants reach
Grants abroad, by region: $28M on the FY2024 return
Schedule F, as filed: 7 regions. The IRS asks for region and purpose, not the recipient, so no country or grantee can be named here.
Stated purpose: PROGRAM SERVICE
Stated purpose: PROGRAM SERVICE
Stated purpose: PROGRAM SERVICE
Stated purpose: PROGRAM SERVICE
Stated purpose: PROGRAM SERVICE
Stated purpose: PROGRAM SERVICE
Stated purpose: PROGRAM SERVICE
How this is measured
Who it funds again
Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.
12 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2024, 5 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 76% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $739k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
How this is measured
Backed again, and grew
- IGICON GOV'T & PUBLIC HEALTH SOLUTIONS2× · 2023–2024 · $2.4M
- IVINTERNATIONAL VACCINE INSTITUTE5× · 2019–2023 · $2.1M · revenue +120%
- PNPROFESSIONAL NURSES CHAPTER OF THE BRIGHAM & WOMEN'S HOSPITAL C/O MNA6× · 2019–2024 · $1.2M · revenue -81%
Funded once
- MRMPI Research Incone grant, 2018 · $326k
- SFSAIL FOR HEALTH LLCone grant, 2023 · $193k
- IFInnovations for Global Healthone grant, 2022 · $164k
How this is measured
Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
Closest unfunded matches
The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Aahi is a nonprofit biotech research institute, bringing together the best experts, technologies, and platforms to create accessible, high-quality products and solutions for harnessing the immune system to alleviate disease.
The mission of the institute has remained constant since its founding in 1953. as its restated articles of incorporation state the primary purpose and objective of the howard hughes medical institute shall be the promotion of human…
Sanford burnham prebys medical discovery institute's mission is to advance the biomedical sciences by cultivating the next generation of scientific leaders, providing meaningful opportunities for researchers of all backgrounds to learn,…
A nonprofit scientific research organization that develops vaccines and antibodies for hiv, tuberculosis, and emerging infectious diseases.
The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.
We educate the next generation of leaders to improve the health of our society.
To improve the lives of people through innovative scientific and engineering research.
Operate a state-of-the-art, world-class genomic research center that creates and uses advanced genomics to understand the genetic basis of disease. for more information, see schedule o.
The corporation is organized and is operated exclusively for charitable, educational and scientific purposes. all children's research institute supports, encourages, and engages in and conducts medical research and other research in…
Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.
Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland school of medicine, medical services are rendered by the members of the faculty on behalf of the school of medicine in connection with their duties to provide clinical…
The children's hospital of philadelphia, the oldest hospital in the united states dedicated exclusively to pediatrics, strives to be the world leader in the advancement of health care for children by integrating excellent patient care,…
How this is measured
12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.
How this is measured
Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 32 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.
Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee
Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding
A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds INTERNATIONAL VACCINE INSTITUTE ↗
- Who funds PROFESSIONAL NURSES CHAPTER OF THE BRIGHAM & WOMEN'S HOSPITAL C/O MNA ↗
- Who funds President and Fellows of Harvard College ↗
- Who funds TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA ↗
- Who funds GLOBAL HEALTH INNOVATIONS ↗
- Who funds GATES MEDICAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE ↗
- Who funds JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds FONDATION MERIEUX USA INC ↗
- Who funds CHILDREN'S HEALTH & RESEARCH FDTN INC ↗
- Who funds New York University ↗
- Who funds Albert B Sabin Vaccine Institute Inc ↗
- Who funds HJF MEDICAL RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL INC ↗
Co-funders
Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.
Open a dossier: Emory University
How this is measured
How much its grantees rely on government
Each dot is one organization International Vaccine Institute funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from International Vaccine Institute. Bigger dots raise more.
- Johns Hopkins University: 12% of income from government
- President and Fellows of Harvard College: 7% of income from government
- Hjf Medical Research International Inc: 1% of income from government
How this is measured
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to International Vaccine Institute?
Find your warmest path to International Vaccine Institute through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.
Play a game based on International Vaccine Institute’s filings →