Skip to content

· Public charity

International Union of Operating Engineers Stationary Engineers Local 39

Promote the welfare, working conditions and quality of work of the local's members.

$230k
Granted FY2024still arriving
10
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
States reached
$25k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2024.

Education$181kHealth$132kPublic Safety & Disaster$65kPhilanthropy$56kCrime & Legal$45kMembership Benefit$43kEmployment$39kHuman Services$25kOther$0
02FY2024 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 10 grants below total $147,500, the rows itemized in this filing. The $229,525 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $82,025 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k2 grants · $14k
  • $10k–50k8 grants · $134k
$14,500
Median grant
3
States reached
$35M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SFPOA SCHOLARSHIP COMMITTEE$25,000
MARCH OF DIMES$25,000
CHINESE HOSPITAL ASSOCATION$20,000
sheriffs and you foundation$15,000
SACRAMENTO CENTRAL LABOR COUNCIL AFL-CIO$14,500
LOCAL 39 EDUCATIONAL SCHOLARSHIP FUND$12,000
LOVEALL FOUNDATION FOR CHILDREN$12,000
COMMITTEE TO ELECT DEVON REESE$10,000
SMCLC COPE$7,500
COMMITTEE TO ELECT FRANK PEREZ$6,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–24, $135k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%SFPOA SCHOLARSHIP COMMITTEE: $58k → 10%SFPOA SCHOLARSHIP COMMITTEE: $25k → 10%SFPOA SCHOLARSHIP COMMITTEE: $20k → 10%SFPOA SCHOLARSHIP COMMITTEE: $13k → 10%SFPOA SCHOLARSHIP COMMITTEE: $10k → 10%SFPOA SCHOLARSHIP COMMITTEE: $10k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 10% of International Union of Operating Engineers Stationary Engineers Local 39’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 76% of the giving stays in CA; by stated purpose, 66%.

International Union of Operating Engineers Stationary Engineers Local 39lessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

78%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$468k · 7 repeat orgs$134k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +18% since the first grant, against +8% for those funded once.

7 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2024, 0 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

7
5

Total granted

$468k
$110k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+18%
+8%

Still filing today

100%
40%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 84% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $24k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthPhilanthropyEmploymentHuman ServicesEducationPublic Safety & DisasterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TC
    THE COMMUNITY SERVICE FUND
    5× · 2018–2024 · $135k · revenue +274% · 30% of their budget
  • CH
    CHINESE HOSPITAL ASSOCIATION
    6× · 2018–2024 · $68k · revenue +31%
  • TL
    THE LOVEALL FOUNDATION FOR CHILDREN
    5× · 2018–2024 · $56k · revenue +152%

Funded once

  • OE
    OPERATING ENGINEERS NATIONAL CHARITY FUND
    one grant, 2023 · $50k · revenue -79%
  • NU
    NATIONAL UNION OF HEALTHCARE WORKERS
    one grant, 2023 · $25k · revenue +8%
  • B
    BADSCF
    one grant, 2019 · $15k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Laborers' Local 300 Scholarship Fund

To provide scholarships for families of local union members.

Education
2
International Union of Operating Engineerslocal 68

Labor organization

—
3
California State Council of Service Employees

The council coordinated the efforts of affiliated local unions and assisted their organizations work, bettering the working conditions of their members.

—
4
Ufcw Unions & Employers Health & Welfare Plan of Central Ohio

To provide for a uniform health and welfare program for employees employed under certain collective bargaining agreements.

—
5
Northern California Laborers Scholarship Foundation

Provide educational scholarships to children of affiliated union members.

Education
6
Iuoe Local 12 Charitable Golf Committee Inc

To raise funds for public charities.

Philanthropy
7
Armand E Sabitoni Charitable Foundation

To provide financial assistance to the families of members of the laborers' international union of north america (liuna) who have died on the job

—
8
Iuoe Local 15 Charitable Trust

The purpose of the organization is to provide financial assistance to other charitable organizations, any needy and deserving individual or individuals and present and former members of the international union of operating engineers local…

Philanthropy
9
International Union of Operating Engineers Local 428

The organization is a labor union, organized under an International Charter, to provide and promote benefits for its members and represent them in labor negotiations and contract issues.

—
10
1199C National Union of Hospital and Health Care

Labor union to support collective bargaining for its members, conducting membership meetings, education, organizing events to further the common interests of the membership.

—
11
American Federation of Labor Ohio Afl-Cio

To advance middle class and working class values by promoting social and economic justice. we join together over 263,000 union members to make our voice heard in the policy and political arenas. the ohio afl-cio represents 1,787 local…

—
12
United Brotherhood of Carpenters and Joiners of America Lu No 315

Labor union

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is March of Dimes Inc; the most unlike its peers is Sheriffs and You Foundation Inc Say. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2024, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 15 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
5/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

THE COMMUNITY SERVICE FUND: $135,000 · Human ServicesTHE COMMUNITY SERVICE FUN…CHINESE HOSPITAL ASSOCIATION: $67,500 · HealthCHINESE HOSPITAL ASSOCIA…MARCH OF DIMES INC: $60,000 · HealthMARCH OF DIMES INCSACRAMENTO CENTRAL LABOR COUNCIL: $43,200 · OtherSACRAMENTO CENTRA…BADSCF: $15,000 · OtherBADSCFWE ARE MISSOURI: $10,000 · OtherWE ARE MISSOURICOMMITTEE TO ELECT DEVON REESE: $10,000 · OtherCOMMITTEE TO ELEC…SMCLC COPE: $7,500 · OtherSMCLC COPECOMMITTEE TO ELECT FRANK PEREZ: $6,500 · OtherCOMMITTEE TO ELEC…OPERATING ENGINEERS NATIONAL CHARITY FUND: $50,000 · EmploymentOPERATING ENGI…NATIONAL UNION OF HEALTHCARE WORKERS: $25,000 · EmploymentNATIONAL UNION…THE LOVEALL FOUNDATION FOR CHILDREN: $56,000 · PhilanthropyTHE LOVEALL …THE MICHAEL J HACH FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 · PhilanthropyTHE MICHAEL …SHERIFFS AND YOU FOUNDATION INC SAY: $60,000 · Public Safety & DisasterSHERIFFS AN…Local 39 EDUCATIONAL Scholarship FUND: $46,000 · Education
Human Services$135,000Health$127,500Other$92,200Employment$75,000Philanthropy$66,000Public Safety & Disaster$60,000Education$46,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE COMMUNITY SERVICE FUND: $135,000 over 5y, 30% of budgetCHINESE HOSPITAL ASSOCIATION: $67,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetSHERIFFS AND YOU FOUNDATION INC SAY: $60,000 over 4y, 5.4% of budgetMARCH OF DIMES INC: $60,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTHE LOVEALL FOUNDATION FOR CHILDREN: $56,000 over 5y, 2.8% of budgetOPERATING ENGINEERS NATIONAL CHARITY FUND: $50,000 over 1y, 2.8% of budgetLocal 39 EDUCATIONAL Scholarship FUND: $46,000 over 4y, 6.5% of budgetSACRAMENTO CENTRAL LABOR COUNCIL: $43,200 over 4y, 1.1% of budgetNATIONAL UNION OF HEALTHCARE WORKERS: $25,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE COMMUNITY SERVICE FUND ↗
  • Who funds CHINESE HOSPITAL ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds SHERIFFS AND YOU FOUNDATION INC SAY ↗
  • Who funds MARCH OF DIMES INC ↗
  • Who funds THE LOVEALL FOUNDATION FOR CHILDREN ↗
  • Who funds OPERATING ENGINEERS NATIONAL CHARITY FUND ↗
  • Who funds Local 39 EDUCATIONAL Scholarship FUND ↗
  • Who funds SACRAMENTO CENTRAL LABOR COUNCIL ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL UNION OF HEALTHCARE WORKERS ↗

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization International Union of Operating Engineers Stationary Engineers Local 39 funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from International Union of Operating Engineers Stationary Engineers Local 39. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24
no gov · 00%2%8%17%30%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–24
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 15 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on International Union of Operating Engineers Stationary Engineers Local 39’s filings →

    More from the funding graph