Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

International Myeloma Foundation

Dedicated to improving the quality of life of myeloma patients while working toward prevention and a cure.

$212k
Granted FY2025still arriving
3
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$33k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Health$1.1M
02FY2025 · 3 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 3 grants below total $76,667 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $212,000 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $135,333 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

$26,667
Median grant
2
States reached
$18M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE$33,333
NEW YORK WEILL CORNELL MEDICAL CENTER FUND INC$26,667
THE GENERAL HOSPITAL CORPORATION$16,667
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 87% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%DANA FARBER CANCER INSTITUTE: $83k → 16%MAYO CLINIC: $16k → 9%UNIVERSITY OF SAN DIEGO: $33k → 11%NEW YORK WEILL CORNELL MEDICAL CENTER FUND INC: $53k → 17%UNIVERSITY OF IOWA: $33k → 15%MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY: $53k → 16%WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES: $53k → 15%Huntsman Cancer Institute University of Utah: $87k → 8%Indiana University School of Medicine: $33k → 16%CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY: $53k → 17%DANA FARBER CANCER INSTITUTE: $70k → 16%UNIVERSITY OF SAN DIEGO: $17k → 11%NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE: $33k → 17%MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY: $27k → 16%WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES: $27k → 15%HUNTSMAN CANCER INSTITUTE UNIVERSITY OF UTAH: $43k → 8%INDIANA UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE: $17k → 16%CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY: $27k → 17%DANA FARBER CANCER INSTITUTE: $60k → 16%NEW YORK WEILL CORNELL MEDICAL CENTER FUND INC: $27k → 17%DANA FARBER CANCER INSTITUTE: $33k → 16%MEMORIAL SLOAN KETTERING CANCER CENTRE: $33k → 17%DANA FARBER CANCER INSTITUTE: $33k → 16%MEMORIAL SLOAN KETTERING CANCER CENTRE: $17k → 17%TRUSTEES OF BOSTON UNIVERSITY: $33k → 16%TRUSTEES OF BOSTON UNIVERSITY: $17k → 16%DANA FARBER CANCER INSTITUTE: $17k → 16%DANA FARBER CANCER INSTITUTE: $17k → 16%DANA FARBER CANCER INSTITUTE: $17k → 16%THE GENERAL HOSPITAL CORPORATION: $33k → 16%THE GENERAL HOSPITAL CORPORATION: $17k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

MN
MI
NY
MA
IA
IN
OH
CA
UT
NC
AL

Grants abroad, by region — $135k on the FY2025 return

Schedule F, as filed: 4 regions. The IRS asks for region and purpose, not the recipient, so no country or grantee can be named here.

Europe (including Iceland and Greenland)$111k · 82% · 4 grants

Stated purpose: BORON-RICH ANTIBODIES FOR SYNERGISTIC TARGETED THERAPY WITH BNCT IN MULTIPLE MYELOMA. · SUPPORTING EDUCATION AND OUTREACH TO LOCAL COMMUNITIES OF MYELOMA PATIENT ORGANIZATIONS.

Sub-Saharan Africa$8k · 6% · 1 grant

Stated purpose: SUPPORTING EDUCATION AND OUTREACH TO LOCAL COMMUNITIES OF MYELOMA PATIENT ORGANIZATIONS.

Russia and Neighboring States$8k · 6% · 1 grant

Stated purpose: SUPPORTING EDUCATION AND OUTREACH TO LOCAL COMMUNITIES OF MYELOMA PATIENT ORGANIZATIONS.

North America (Canada and Mexico)$8k · 6% · 1 grant

Stated purpose: SUPPORTING EDUCATION AND OUTREACH TO LOCAL COMMUNITIES OF MYELOMA PATIENT ORGANIZATIONS.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving. Grants abroad on Schedule F are filed by region, purpose and amount with no recipient name, so they are shown by region and cannot be placed on the country map or matched to a grantee.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 13% of International Myeloma Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another. Read by recipient address, 4% of the giving stays in CA; read by stated purpose it is 16% — more of the work is directed home than the recipients' locations suggest.

International Myeloma Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

91%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$1.0M · 11 repeat orgs$100k to everyone else

11 repeat relationships — 2 still active in FY2025, 9 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

11
2

Total granted

$1.0M
$67k

Still filing today

55%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 57% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $33k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthEducationOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc
    8× · 2017–2024 · $329k · revenue +132%
  • NY
    NEW YORK WEILL CORNELL MEDICAL CENTER FUND INC
    2× · 2024–2025 · $80k · revenue +55%
  • CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY
    2× · 2023–2024 · $80k · revenue +14%

Funded once

  • SU
    State University of Iowa
    one grant, 2017 · $33k
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM
    one grant, 2017 · $33k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center

Leadership in the prevention, treatment, and cure of cancer through excellence, vision and cost effectiveness in patient care, outreach programs, research, and education.

Health
2
The Johns Hopkins Hospital

For more than 125 years, the mission of the johns hopkins hospital has been to lead the world in the diagnosis and treatment of disease and to train tomorrow's great physicians, nurses and scientists. above all, we aim to provide the…

Health
3
Sanford Burnham Prebys Medical Discovery Institute

Sanford burnham prebys medical discovery institute's mission is to advance the biomedical sciences by cultivating the next generation of scientific leaders, providing meaningful opportunities for researchers of all backgrounds to learn,…

Health
4
Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center

Fred hutch cancer center ("fred hutch") unites innovative research and compassionate care to prevent and eliminate cancer and infectious disease. continued on schedule o

Health
5
Mass General Brigham Incorporated & Affiliates Group Return

Mass general brigham incorporated is developing an integrated health care delivery system throughout the region that offers patients a continuum of coordinated, high-quality care.

Health
6
The Translational Genomics Research Institute

Please see schedule o

Health
7
Albany College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences

We educate the next generation of leaders to improve the health of our society.

Education
8
Baylor Research Institute

To improve the care and well being of our community, nationally and internationally, through innovative clinically relevant research that is consistent with the mission, vision and values of Baylor Scott & White Health (BSWH).

Health
9
Rush University Medical Center

The mission of Rush is to improve the health of the individuals and diverse communities we serve through the integration of outstanding patient care, education, research and community partnerships.

Health
10
Targeting Resistance in Cancer Cooperative
Health
11
New York University

Nyu is a private university with approximately 60,000 matriculating students in 20 schools and institutes. nyu's primary missions are education, research and scholarship, and patient care.

Education
12
New York Genome Center Inc

Operate a state-of-the-art, world-class genomic research center that creates and uses advanced genomics to understand the genetic basis of disease. for more information, see schedule o.

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center and the most unlike its peers is Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

05the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 15 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
7/8
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc — $329,346 · HealthDana-Farber Cancer Institute IncNEW YORK WEILL CORNELL MEDICAL CENTER FUND INC — $80,000 · HealthNEW YORK WEILL CORNELL MEDICAL CENTER FUND INCMEMORIAL SLOAN-KETTERING CANCER CENTER — $50,000 · HealthMEMORIAL SLOAN-KETTERING CANCER CENTERCANCER RESEARCH INSTITUTE INC — $33,333 · HealthCANCER RESEARCH INSTITUTE INC+1 more — $16,341 · HealthHuntsman Cancer Institute University of Utah — $130,000 · OtherHuntsman Cancer Institute University of UtahMICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY — $80,000 · OtherMICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITYREGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA — $50,000 · OtherREGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIATRUSTEES OF BOSTON UNIVERSITY — $50,000 · OtherTRUSTEES OF BOSTON UNIVERSITYMASS GENERAL BRIGHAM INCORPORATED — $50,000 · OtherMASS GENERAL BRIGHAM INCORPORATEDIndiana University School of Medicine — $50,000 · OtherIndiana University School of MedicineState University of Iowa — $33,333 · OtherState University of IowaUNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM — $33,333 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAMCASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY — $80,000 · EducationCASE WESTERN RE…WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES — $79,999 · EducationWAKE FOREST UNI…
Health$509,020Other$476,666Education$159,999

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetDana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc — $329,346 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetNEW YORK WEILL CORNELL MEDICAL CENTER FUND INC — $80,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetCASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY — $80,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES — $79,999 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTRUSTEES OF BOSTON UNIVERSITY — $50,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMEMORIAL SLOAN-KETTERING CANCER CENTER — $50,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCANCER RESEARCH INSTITUTE INC — $33,333 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMAYO CLINIC — $16,341 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc
  • Who funds NEW YORK WEILL CORNELL MEDICAL CENTER FUND INC
  • Who funds CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES
  • Who funds TRUSTEES OF BOSTON UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds MEMORIAL SLOAN-KETTERING CANCER CENTER
  • Who funds CANCER RESEARCH INSTITUTE INC
  • Who funds MAYO CLINIC

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization International Myeloma Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 12%
  • Trustees of Boston University12% of income from government
  • Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc7% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 15 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph