Skip to content
Foundation DossiersAlso receives grants: funding profile →

Hawaii · Public charity

International Longshore & Warehouse Union Local 142

Labor union that provides economic and social betterment for its members, in general. In particular, to (a) carry on collective bargaining process with employers engaged in agriculture, stevedoring, tourism and other related industries; (b) promote fellowship, harmony and unity among its members, associated with the aforementioned…

$72k
Granted FY2024(still arriving)
5
Itemized grants FY2024
Read the full brief
Itemized, FY2024
$34k
The rest is grants the schedule does not break out
Median grant, FY2024
$6,000
Largest grant, FY2024
$10,000
States reached, FY2024
1
Total assets, FY2024
$42M

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2024 to FY2024, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
The Legion Group$10,0001n/a
Make-A-Wish Foundation of Hawaii$6,50010%
Women Speaking Out$6,00011%
Hawaii Employees Lifeline Program$5,50014%
United Public Workers Foundation$5,50018%

Compare International Longshore & Warehouse Union Local 142 with peer funders

About International Longshore & Warehouse Union Local 142

How much does International Longshore & Warehouse Union Local 142 give?
International Longshore & Warehouse Union Local 142 reported 5 itemized grants totaling $33,500, out of $71,573 in total grant expense reported on the return in its FY2024 IRS filing.
What does International Longshore & Warehouse Union Local 142 fund?
By grant dollars over FY2024 to FY2024, its largest causes are Civil Rights (30%), Health (19%), Crime & Legal (18%).
Who are International Longshore & Warehouse Union Local 142's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2024 to FY2024: The Legion Group ($10k), Make-A-Wish Foundation of Hawaii ($7k), Women Speaking Out ($6k).
Where is International Longshore & Warehouse Union Local 142 based?
International Longshore & Warehouse Union Local 142 is based in HI.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 5 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on International Longshore & Warehouse Union Local 142’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home