Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

International Justice Mission

The mission of INTERNATIONAL JUSTICE MISSION is to protect people in poverty from violence by working with partners to rescue victims, bring criminals to justice, restore survivors to safety and strength, (see schedule o)and help local law enforcement build a safe future that lasts.

$2.6M
Granted FY2025still arriving
5
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$50k
Largest
01What you fund
01FY2025 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 5 grants below total $150,000 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $2,585,695 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $2,435,695 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k4 grants · $100k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
$25,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$98M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF MIDDLE TN INC$50,000
ECPAT USA INC$25,000
RESTORE NYC INC$25,000
ANNIECANNONS INC$25,000
SURVIVOR ALLIANCE$25,000
02The need
02

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY25–25, $25k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%ANNIECANNONS INC: $25k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Grants abroad, by region — $1.6M on the FY2025 return

Schedule F, as filed: 6 regions, $1.3M to organizations and $345k to individuals. The IRS asks for region and purpose, not the recipient, so no country or grantee can be named here.

East Asia and the Pacific$650k · 39% · 5 grants · 484 people

Stated purpose: PROVIDE HOLISTIC AFTERCARE SERVICES TO VICTIMS OF FORCED LABOR · PROVIDE LEGAL SERVICES FOR CASES OF FORCED LABOR IN THE FISHING INDUSTRY · SUBAWARD UNDER JTIP MALAYSIA GRANT TO SUPPORT VICTIM-CENTERED RESPONSE TO TRAFFICKING

Central America and the Caribbean$408k · 25% · 9 grants · 67 people

Stated purpose: SUPPORT IJM PARTNER'S HOLISTIC APPROACH TO CARE FOR VICTIMS AND COMBAT DOMESTIC VIOLENCE AGAINST WOMEN AND CHILDREN IN EL SALVADOR · SUPPORT THE ADVANCEMENT OF THE HUMAN RIGHTS OF WOMEN AND GIRLS AGAINST VIOLENCE IN GUATEMALA · SUPPORT OBJECTIVES OF SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT TO THE NEEDIEST PEOPLE, ESPECIALLY WOMEN AND CHILDREN IN EL SALVADOR.

Europe (including Iceland and Greenland)$283k · 17% · 2 grants · 37 people

Stated purpose: PROVIDE EMERGENCY RELIEF AND SUPPORT FOR TRANSIT REFUGEES AND TRAFFICKED VICTIMS IN ROMANIA · PROVIDE SUPPORT TO VICTIMS OF SEXUAL OR VIOLENT CRIMES BY IMPROVING JUSTICE SYSTEM RESPONSE AND POLICY REFORM · AFTERCARE COSTS FOR VICTIMS OF SEXUAL VIOLENCE AND FORCED LABOR

Sub-Saharan Africa$189k · 11% · 3 grants · 548 people

Stated purpose: HOLISTIC SERVICES TO COMBAT GENDER-BASED VIOLENCE, HUMAN TRAFFICKING, AND CHILD EXPLOITATION. · AFTERCARE COSTS FOR VICTIMS OF SEXUAL VIOLENCE, FORCED LABOR AND POLICE ABUSE OF POWER

South America$113k · 7% · 2 grants · 166 people

Stated purpose: AFTERCARE COSTS FOR PARTNER SUPPORTING VICTIMS OF VIOLENCE AGAINST WOMEN AND CHILDREN

South Asia$4k · 0% · 995 people

Stated purpose: INDIRECT AFTERCARE SUPPORT THROUGH PARTNERSHIPS FOR BONDED LABOR AND SEX TRAFFICKING

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving. Grants abroad on Schedule F are filed by region, purpose and amount with no recipient name, so they are shown by region and cannot be placed on the country map or matched to a grantee.

03Your field
03the grantee network

5 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
5/5
Grantees still filing
5/5
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

THE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF MIDDLE TENNESSEE INC — $50,000 · PhilanthropyTHE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF MIDDLE TE…RESTORE NYC INC — $25,000 · Human ServicesRESTORE NYC INCAnnieCannons Inc — $25,000 · Human ServicesAnnieCannons IncSURVIVOR ALLIANCE — $25,000 · InternationalSURVIVOR ALLIANCEECPAT-USA INC — $25,000 · InternationalECPAT-USA INC
Philanthropy$50,000Human Services$50,000International$50,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%grantee revenue →↑ your share of their budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization International Justice Mission funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
2021222324
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
    typical government reliance, FY2024

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 5 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph