Skip to content
Foundation Dossiers

Washington · Public charity

International Fruit Tree Association

To promote an understanding of the nature and use of intensive orchard systems through research,education, and dissemination of information.

$53k
Granted FY2019
1
Grants FY2019
1
Organizations funded FY2019
Read the full brief
Median grant, FY2019
$52,500
Largest grant, FY2019
$52,500
States reached, FY2019
1
Total assets, FY2019
$410k

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2019 to FY2019, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
Ifta Research Foundation$52,500135%

Compare International Fruit Tree Association with peer funders

About International Fruit Tree Association

How much does International Fruit Tree Association give?
International Fruit Tree Association reported 1 grants totaling $52,500 in its FY2019 IRS filing.
What does International Fruit Tree Association fund?
By grant dollars over FY2019 to FY2019, its largest causes are Environment (100%).
Who are International Fruit Tree Association's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2019 to FY2019: Ifta Research Foundation ($53k).
Where is International Fruit Tree Association based?
International Fruit Tree Association is based in WA.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 1 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2019, released 2019. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2025) is on record and reports no grant expense, so the figures above are from FY2019, the most recent year this funder made grants.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on International Fruit Tree Association’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home