Skip to content

Arizona · Public charity

International Foundation for Research in Experimental Economics

The foundation promotes human betterment through experimental economics to improve the understanding of exchange systems.* ifree funds primary research in market and personal exchange systems* ifree sponsors participatory, hands-on, educational workshops, interdisciplinary academic discussions, and outreach programs for those outside the…

$288k
Granted FY2020
6
Itemized grants FY2020
6
Organizations funded FY2020
33%
First-time grantees FY2020
Read the full brief

Read this first · the figures below need context

83% of International Foundation for Research in Experimental Economics’s FY2021 grant dollars went to The Alaska Community Foundation, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2021 names 5 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it. Everything below is therefore FY2020, the last year International Foundation for Research in Experimental Economics named its own grantees at scale: 6 organizations, $151k. It is dated, not current.

Organizations named directly on the return

12
’17
9
’18
10
’19
6
’20
5
’21

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

Itemized, FY2020
$151k
The rest is grants the schedule does not break out
Median grant, FY2020
$11,000
Largest grant, FY2020
$69,466
Organizations funded a year
6 to 12
FY2017 to FY2020
States reached, FY2020
6

How open it is to new grantees

In FY2020, 33% of the organizations International Foundation for Research in Experimental Economics funded were first-time grantees, receiving 10% of its grant dollars.

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2020, 90% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $15k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20
EducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
The numbers by year
Fiscal yearOrganizations fundedTo those organizationsFirst-time grantees
FY20206$151k33%
FY201910$265k30%
FY20189$255k44%
FY201712$237kn/a
100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2021.

Education$653kPhilanthropy$310kSocial Science$296kScience & Tech$33kCommunity Improvement$10k

Where its grants go

Grant dollars by states, across the years we hold.

Which US states its grants reach

AK
VT
IL
WI
NY
IN
OH
PA
RI
CA
VA
MD
TN
HI
AL
TX
FL

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2017 to FY2021, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
Chapman University$236,04950%
Mercatus Center Inc$182,50040%
Board of the University of Alabama$172,4533n/a
University of Alaska Foundation$80,60540%
William Marsh Rice University$36,00010%
Southern Methodist University$35,00010%
Texas A&M University$27,5002n/a
Trustees of Purdue University$21,0252n/a
Regents of the University of California$20,0002n/a
President and Fellows of Middlebury College$19,86920%
Show all 23 grantees
All grantees of International Foundation for Research in Experimental Economics by total granted
GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
Chapman University$236,04950%
Mercatus Center Inc$182,50040%
Board of the University of Alabama$172,4533n/a
University of Alaska Foundation$80,60540%
William Marsh Rice University$36,00010%
Southern Methodist University$35,00010%
Texas A&M University$27,5002n/a
Trustees of Purdue University$21,0252n/a
Regents of the University of California$20,0002n/a
President and Fellows of Middlebury College$19,86920%
University of Pittsburgh$16,24020%
Regents of the University of California at Irvine$12,9772n/a
University of Wisconsin Madison$12,5873n/a
University of Hawaii System$10,0001n/a
Birmingham-Southern College$10,00010%
Rector & Visitors of the University of Virginia$10,0001n/a
Florida State University Research Foundation Inc$10,00010%
University of California Davis$9,9481n/a
University of Chicago$9,90010%
University of Maryland College Park$9,8622n/a
The Research Foundation for The State University of New York$9,60010%
The Ohio State University$9,6001n/a
University of Tennessee Research Foundation$5,21410%

Where it is load-bearing

Each grantee by its size and the share of its budget International Foundation for Research in Experimental Economics supplied at peak.

25%50%75%100%$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetChapman University: $236,049 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetMercatus Center Inc: $182,500 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetUniversity of Alaska Foundation: $80,605 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetWilliam Marsh Rice University: $36,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSouthern Methodist University: $35,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPresident and Fellows of Middlebury College: $19,869 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetUniversity of Pittsburgh: $16,240 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBirmingham-Southern College: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFlorida State University Research Foundation Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetUniversity of Chicago: $9,900 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe Research Foundation for The State University of New York: $9,600 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUniversity of Tennessee Research Foundation: $5,214 over 1y, 0.1% of budget

Tap a dot to name the grantee.

How this is measured
Share of budget is the funder’s grant in a year over the grantee’s total revenue that year, at its highest across the years we hold; revenue is from all sources. Only grantees confirmed against their own filings, whose grants do not exceed their revenue, are plotted: the largest 12.

Nonprofits that may fit its grantmaking

Compare International Foundation for Research in Experimental Economics with peer funders

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to International Foundation for Research in Experimental Economics?

Find your warmest path to International Foundation for Research in Experimental Economics through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

About International Foundation for Research in Experimental Economics

How much does International Foundation for Research in Experimental Economics give?
International Foundation for Research in Experimental Economics reported 6 itemized grants totaling $151,020, out of $288,312 in total grant expense reported on the return in its FY2020 IRS filing. It funded between 6 and 12 organizations a year over FY2017 to FY2020.
What does International Foundation for Research in Experimental Economics fund?
By grant dollars over FY2017 to FY2021, its largest causes are Education (50%), Philanthropy (24%), Social Science (23%).
Who are International Foundation for Research in Experimental Economics's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2017 to FY2021: Chapman University ($236k), Mercatus Center Inc ($183k), Board of the University of Alabama ($172k).
Does International Foundation for Research in Experimental Economics fund new organizations?
In FY2020, 33% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.
Where is International Foundation for Research in Experimental Economics based?
International Foundation for Research in Experimental Economics is based in AZ.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 26 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2020, released 2020. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on International Foundation for Research in Experimental Economics’ filings →

More from the funding graph