Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

International Federation of Professional & Technical Engineers

The objectives of this local union shall be to unite into one labor organization, through the authority of the membership as defined in article v, all workers eligible for membership, regardless of religion, race, creed, color, national origin, age, sex, sexual orientation, gender identity, marital status, physical or mental disability,…

$105k
Granted FY2025still arriving
5
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$30k
Largest
01What you fund
01

What you funded, over time

By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 95% of INTERNATIONAL FEDERATION OF PROFESSIONAL & TECHNICAL ENGINEERS’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.

02FY2025 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 5 grants below total $72,500 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $105,408 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $32,908 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $8k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $65k
$10,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$21M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
OAKLANDERS FOR SAFE CLEAN STREETS$30,000
OAKLANDERS TOGETHER FOR A SAFER OAK$15,000
SAN FRANCISCO LABOR COUNCIL GENERAL$10,000
YES ON L FUND THE BUS$10,000
IFPTE$7,500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY18–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 68% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%YES ON A - COMMITTEE FOR FUTURE OF: $10k → 8%YES ON MEASURE H - KIDS FIRST: $10k → 9%HEALTH & SAFETY CONTRA COSTA: $30k → 10%IFPTE: $8k → 10%EAST BAY WORKING FAMILIES A COALIT: $10k → 12%OAKLANDERS FOR SAFE CLEAN STREETS: $30k → 14%SAN JOSE RESIDENTS FOR FAIR ELECTIO: $10k → 8%CONTRA COSTA LABOR TO LABOR: $10k → 9%INVEST IN OUR OAKLAND 2022: $24k → 10%UP THE VOTE YES ON H: $40k → 10%SOUTH BAY AFL-CIO LABOR COUNCIL COP: $20k → 12%CAPITAL AND MAIN: $20k → 14%COMMITTEE FOR YES ON L: $20k → 10%AFFORDABLE HOUSING ALLIANCE PAC: $10k → 10%YES ON L FUND THE BUS: $10k → 10%YES ON B COMITTEE TO RESTORE POLICE: $200k → 10%SAN LEANDRANS FOR GREAT CITY YES ON: $10k → 10%SFLC LABOR NEIGHBOR MEMBER ED: $35k → 10%CHINESE PROGESSIVE ASSOCIATION: $10k → 10%SAN FRANCISCO LABOR COUNCIL GENERAL: $10k → 10%COMMITTEE TO PROTECT HAYWARDS FUTUR: $10k → 10%SF LABOR & NEIGBOR MEMBER EDUPOLI: $10k → 10%OAKLAND FOR FAIR TAXATION & IMPROVE: $10k → 10%SF LABOR COUNCIL AFL-CIO: $5k → 10%ALAMEDA LABOR COUNCIL UNITY PAC: $9k → 10%ALAMEDA LABOR COUNCIL: $8k → 10%ALAMEDA LABOR COUNCIL: $6k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your field
04the grantee network

6 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 6 of the 27 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
4/6
Grantees still filing
1/6
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

YES ON B COMITTEE TO RESTORE POLICE — $200,000 · OtherYES ON B COMITTEE TO RESTORE POLICEUP THE VOTE YES ON H — $40,000 · OtherUP THE VOTE YES ON HSFLC LABOR NEIGHBOR MEMBER ED — $35,000 · OtherSFLC LABOR NEIGHBOR MEMBER EDOAKLANDERS FOR SAFE CLEAN STREETS — $30,000 · OtherHEALTH & SAFETY CONTRA COSTA — $30,000 · OtherInvest In Our Oakland — $24,465 · OtherCOMMITTEE FOR YES ON L — $20,000 · OtherSOUTH BAY AFL-CIO LABOR COUNCIL COP — $20,000 · Other+17 more — $170,848 · Other+17 moreCAPITAL & MAIN — $20,000 · Arts & CultureCHINESE PROGRESSIVE ASSOCIATION — $10,000 · Health
Other$570,313Arts & Culture$20,000Health$10,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetInvest In Our Oakland — $24,465 over 1y, 4.5% of budgetCAPITAL & MAIN — $20,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetAMERICAN FEDERATION OF LABOR & ALAMEDA LABOR COUNCIL — $14,098 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetSan Jose Residents for Fair Elections — $10,000 over 1y, 2.4% of budgetCHINESE PROGRESSIVE ASSOCIATION — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Invest In Our Oakland
  • Who funds CAPITAL & MAIN
  • Who funds AMERICAN FEDERATION OF LABOR & ALAMEDA LABOR COUNCIL
  • Who funds Yes on L Fund the Bus
  • Who funds San Jose Residents for Fair Elections
  • Who funds CHINESE PROGRESSIVE ASSOCIATION

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization International Federation of Professional & Technical Engineers funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
2021222324
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY2024

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 27 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph