Skip to content
International Council of Shopping Centers Inc at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

International Council of Shopping Centers Inc

The purpose of icsc is to serve its members by offering and delivering programs and services and advocating for and promoting the marketplace industry with the general public and relevant governmental bodies.

$29k
Granted FY2024still arriving
1
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$25k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Community Improvement$645kPublic Safety & Disaster$420kEducation$100kPublic Benefit$78kYouth Development$25kHealth$15k
02FY2024 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 1 grants below total $25,000, the rows itemized in this filing. The $28,700 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $3,700 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.
$25,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$191M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CONGRESSIONAL HISPANIC CAUCUS INSTITUTE INC$25,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–17, $420k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%American national red cross: $420k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

56%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$723k · 5 repeat orgs$560k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +50% since the first grant, against +13% for those funded once.

5 repeat relationships: 0 still active in FY2024, 5 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

5
3

Total granted

$723k
$535k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+50%
+13%

Still filing today

100%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 0% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $25k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’23’24
EducationPublic BenefitHuman ServicesYouth DevelopmentHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • IC
    INTERNATIONAL COUNCIL OF SHOPPING CENTERS FOUNDATION INC
    3× · 2017–2019 · $600k · revenue +1%
  • CB
    CALIFORNIA BUSINESS PROPERTIES ASSOCIATION
    2× · 2018–2019 · $45k · revenue +36%
  • TF
    TAX FOUNDATION
    2× · 2018–2019 · $28k · revenue +50%

Funded once

  • AN
    American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branchesgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $420k · revenue +46%
  • LF
    LSU FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2023 · $100k · revenue +13%
  • MARCH OF DIMES INC
    one grant, 2018 · $15k · revenue -41%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Federation of State Medical Boards of the United States Inc

The fsmb serves as the voice for state medical boards, supporting them through education, assessment, research and advocacy while providing services and initiatives that promote patient safety, quality health care and regulatory best…

Health
2
Council of Institutional Investors

Educate/advocate for effective corporate governance and public company disclosure, strong shareholder rights and fair capital markets.

—
3
Aacsb International - the Association to Advance Collegiate Schools of Business

Aacsb international provides quality assurance of business school programs, the latest in business education intelligence, thought leadership, and learning and development services.

Education
4
Counselors of Real Estate

Cre was established exclusively for real estate advisors who provide intelligent, unbiased, and trusted advice for a client or employer. the purpose of the organization is to serve as an information resource and to provide its members with…

Community Improvement
5
United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

—
6
Atlantic Council of the United States Inc

The atlantic council, through its research and analysis, promotes constructive leadership and engagement in international affairs based on the central role of the atlantic community in meeting global challenges.

International
7
Cna Corporation

Cna is a non-profit research organization that operates the center for naval analyses, a federally funded research center that has supported the navy and marine corps for nearly seventy years, and the institute for public research that…

—
8
The Ccim Institute

The mission of the ccim institute is to elevate our members to the highest levels of success in the commercial real estate profession.

Community Improvement
9
American Council On Education

Ace leads higher education with a united vision for the future, galvanizing our members to make change. the council collaborates across the sector to design solutions for today's challenges, serves the needs of a diverse student…

Education
10
Chief Executives for Corporate Purpose Inc

Chief executives for corporate purpose (cecp) is the only business counsel and network dedicated to driving measurable returns on purpose. we promote responsible purpose-driven business as it increases customer loyalty, builds employee…

Philanthropy
11
International Life Sciences Institute

Ilsi is a global, nonprofit federation dedicated to generating and advancing emerging science and groundbreaking research to ensure foods are safe, nutritious and sustainable, and that they improve planetary and human health and well-being…

Science & Tech
12
International Code Council Inc

Our mission is to protect public safety through the continuous development of modern building codes and standards which provide the baseline for building safety globally and create a level playing field for builders and manufacturers. our…

Community Improvement
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Ncsl Foundation for State Legislatures; the most unlike its peers is American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
7/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

INTERNATIONAL COUNCIL OF SHOPPING CENTERS FOUNDATION INC: $600,000 · EducationINTERNATIONAL COUNCIL OF SHOPPING CENTERS FOUNDATION INCLSU FOUNDATION: $100,000 · EducationLSU FOUNDATIONAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $420,200 · Human ServicesAmerican National Red Cross & Its Con…CALIFORNIA BUSINESS PROPERTIES ASSOCIATION: $45,000 · OtherCONGRESSIONAL HISPANIC CAUCUS INSTITUTE INC: $25,000 · OtherTAX FOUNDATION: $27,500 · Public BenefitNCSL FOUNDATION FOR STATE LEGISLATURES: $25,000 · Public BenefitCONGRESSIONAL SPORTS FOR CHARITY: $25,000 · Youth DevelopmentMARCH OF DIMES INC: $15,000 · Health
Education$700,000Human Services$420,200Other$70,000Public Benefit$52,500Youth Development$25,000Health$15,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetINTERNATIONAL COUNCIL OF SHOPPING CENTERS FOUNDATION INC: $600,000 over 3y, 25% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $420,200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLSU FOUNDATION: $100,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCALIFORNIA BUSINESS PROPERTIES ASSOCIATION: $45,000 over 2y, 2.5% of budgetTAX FOUNDATION: $27,500 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetCONGRESSIONAL SPORTS FOR CHARITY: $25,000 over 2y, 1.9% of budgetCONGRESSIONAL HISPANIC CAUCUS INSTITUTE INC: $25,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetNCSL FOUNDATION FOR STATE LEGISLATURES: $25,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetMARCH OF DIMES INC: $15,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization International Council of Shopping Centers Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from International Council of Shopping Centers Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 9 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on International Council of Shopping Centers’ filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home