Skip to content
International Center for Professional Development at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

International Center for Professional Development

Offer continuing education prgrams for students, military veterans and life science professionals using personalized, face-to-face experiential training and ongoing web-based support.

$115k
Granted FY2024still arriving
17
Grants FY2024still arriving
13
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01FY2024 · 17 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k11 grants · $55k
  • $10k–50k6 grants · $60k
$5,000
Median grant
13
States reached
$131k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY$10,000
HARVARD COLLEGE$10,000
DUKE UNIVERSITY$10,000
WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY$10,000
UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO$10,000
UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO$10,000
HAMPTON UNIVERSITY$5,000
WORCESTER POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE$5,000
UNIVERSITY OF CENTRAL FLORIDA$5,000
PURDUE UNIVERSITY$5,000
GEORGIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY$5,000
UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN$5,000
DREXEL UNIVERSITY$5,000
BOSTON UNIVERSITY$5,000
UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS$5,000
02The need
02

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY24–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 60% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%HARVARD COLLEGE: $10k → 8%UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS: $5k → 11%DREXEL UNIVERSITY: $5k → 22%CORNELL UNIVERSITY: $5k → 16%UNIVERSITY OF CENTRAL FLORIDA: $5k → 13%UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN: $5k → 21%WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY: $10k → 11%DUKE UNIVERSITY: $10k → 11%GEORGIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY: $5k → 13%PURDUE UNIVERSITY: $5k → 19%BOSTON UNIVERSITY: $5k → 12%UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO: $10k → 14%HAMPTON UNIVERSITY: $5k → 14%WORCESTER POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE: $5k → 11%UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO: $10k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
MI
NY
MA
IN
OH
PA
MO
VA
TN
NC
GA
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Western New England University

Western new england university, a comprehensive private institution with a tradition of excellence in teaching and scholarship and a commitment to service, awards undergraduate, master's, and doctoral degrees in various departments from…

Education
2
University of Miami

See Form 990, Part I, Line 1, Description of Organization Mission.

Education
3
William Marsh Rice University

As a leading research university with a distinctive commitment to undergraduate education, Rice University aspires to path breaking research, unsurpassed teaching, and contributions to the betterment of our world. It seeks to fulfill this…

Education
4
Trustees of the University of Pennsylvania

The trustees of the university of pennsylvania (the "university") sees itself as having a public service mission. in such regard, the university aims to provide a rich and diverse educational environment for its students; to pioneer…

Education
5
Bentley University

Organization's mission bentley university believes good business can impact more than the bottom line - it can change the world. bentley is a community of future business leaders who will deliver value in the marketplace and lasting…

Education
6
Trustees of Dartmouth College

Dartmouth College educates the most promising students and prepares them for a lifetime of learning and of responsible leadership, through a faculty dedicated to teaching and the creation of knowledge.

Education
7
New York University

Nyu is a private university with approximately 60,000 matriculating students in 20 schools and institutes. nyu's primary missions are education, research and scholarship, and patient care.

Education
8
Trustees of Boston College

Mission strengthened by more than a century and a half of dedication to academic excellence, boston college commits itself to the highest standards of teaching and research in undergraduate, graduate and professional programs and to the…

Education
9
Lehigh University

The university's goal in the coming decade is to advance learning through the integration of teaching, research and service to others. the core of this goal is to prepare graduates to engage with the world and lead lives of meaning. to do…

Education
10
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
11
Trustees of Tufts College

Education and Research

Education
12
University of Southern California

The central mission of the university of southern california is the development of human beings and society as a whole through the cultivation and enrichment of the human mind and spirit. the principal means by which our mission is…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Trustees of Boston University; the most unlike its peers is Harvard College Trust. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
03the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 17 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
11/11
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Vanderbilt University: $10,000 · EducationVanderbilt UniversityUniversity of Chicago: $10,000 · EducationUniversity of ChicagoDUKE UNIVERSITY: $10,000 · EducationDUKE UNIVERSITYWASHINGTON UNIVERSITY: $10,000 · EducationWASHINGTON UNIVERSITYCornell University: $5,000 · EducationCornell UniversityUNIVERSITY OF CENTRAL FLORIDA FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF CENTRAL FLORIDA FOUNDATION INCDREXEL UNIVERSITY: $5,000 · EducationDREXEL UNIVERSITYHAMPTON UNIVERSITY: $5,000 · EducationHAMPTON UNIVERSITYHARVARD COLLEGE TRUST: $10,000 · OtherHARVARD COLLEGE TRUSTTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS: $10,000 · OtherTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOISWORCESTER POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE: $5,000 · OtherWORCESTER POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTEGEORGIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY: $5,000 · OtherGEORGIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGYCURATORS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI: $5,000 · OtherCURATORS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURIREGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN: $5,000 · OtherREGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGANTRUSTEES OF BOSTON UNIVERSITY: $5,000 · OtherTRUSTEES OF BOSTON UNIVERSITYTRUSTEES OF PURDUE UNIVERSITY: $5,000 · OtherTRUSTEES OF PURDUE UNIVERSITYUNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS: $5,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS
Education$60,000Other$55,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetVanderbilt University: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHARVARD COLLEGE TRUST: $10,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetUniversity of Chicago: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDUKE UNIVERSITY: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWASHINGTON UNIVERSITY: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCornell University: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWORCESTER POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF CENTRAL FLORIDA FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTRUSTEES OF BOSTON UNIVERSITY: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDREXEL UNIVERSITY: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHAMPTON UNIVERSITY: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization International Center for Professional Development funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from International Center for Professional Development. Bigger dots raise more.

2025
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%8%15%22%30%share of the org’s income from government →median 12%
  • Trustees of Boston University: 12% of income from government
  • Worcester Polytechnic Institute: 6% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 17 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on International Center for Professional Development’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home