· Public charity
International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers Local 569 AFL-CIO
The mission of Local Union 569 of the International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers is to organize all electrical workers within its jurisdiction to secure improved wages and working conditions through negotiations and collective bargaining, and to promote and participate in educational activities which are designed to improve the…
What you funded, over time
Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2024–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 7 grants below total $129,700 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $158,450 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $28,750 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k3 grants · $20k
- $10k–50k3 grants · $60k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Climate Action Campaign | $50,000 |
| Burn Institute | $25,000 |
| San Diego Fleet Week Foundation | $25,000 |
| UC San Diego Foundation | $10,000 |
| Electrical Workers Minority Caucus San Diego | $8,000 |
| Los Amigos De La Comunidad Inc | $6,000 |
| Wounded Warrior Project | $5,700 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY25–25, $6k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
4 repeat relationships — 4 still active in FY2025, 0 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 85% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $20k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- CACLIMATE ACTION CAMPAIGN2× · 2024–2025 · $100k · revenue 0%
- SDSan Diego Fleet Week Foundation2× · 2024–2025 · $50k · revenue 0%
- BIBurn Institute2× · 2024–2025 · $50k · revenue 0%
Funded once
- EWElectrical Workers Minority Caucus of San Diego and Imperial Countiesone grant, 2025 · $8k · revenue 0%
- LALos Amigos De La Comunidad Incone grant, 2025 · $6k
WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INCgraduatedone grant, 2025 · $6k · revenue +70%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
7 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds CLIMATE ACTION CAMPAIGN ↗
- Who funds San Diego Fleet Week Foundation ↗
- Who funds Burn Institute ↗
- Who funds UC SAN DIEGO FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Electrical Workers Minority Caucus of San Diego and Imperial Counties ↗
- Who funds Los Amigos De La Comunidad Inc ↗
- Who funds WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC ↗
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers Local 569 AFL-CIO funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Wounded Warrior Project Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.