Skip to content

· Public charity

International Brotherhood of 667 Tcwh

To provide representation and enforce labor contracts for its membership.

$74k
Granted FY2025still arriving
2
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$8k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2025.

Health$41kMembership Benefit$26kHuman Services$21kYouth Development$13kCivil Rights$11k
02FY2025 · 2 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 2 grants below total $13,200, the rows itemized in this filing. The $73,576 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $60,376 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.
$7,700
Median grant
1
States reached
$1.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
TNBC MEMPHIS DELTA CHAPTER$7,700
PORTER LEATH TOY TRUCK DRIVE$5,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY18–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 19%. 0% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 19%PORTER-LEATH: $10k → 17%PORTER LEATH TOY TRUCK DRIVE: $6k → 17%PORTER-LEATH: $5k → 17%CENTRAL LABOR COUNCIL: $15k → 17%CENTRAL LABOR COUNCIL: $11k → 17%CHRIS HOPE FOUNDATION: $11k → 17%CHRIS HOPE FOUNDATION: $9k → 17%CHRIS HOPE FOUNDATION: $8k → 17%CHRIS HOPE FOUNDATION: $8k → 17%NAACP MEMPHIS BRANCH: $11k → 17%ST JUDES: $6k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

85%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$95k · 4 repeat orgs$17k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +12% since the first grant, against +10% for those funded once.

4 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

4
2

Total granted

$95k
$17k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+12%
+10%

Still filing today

100%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’21’22’23’24’25
HealthYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CH
    CHRIS HOPE FOUNDATION
    4× · 2019–2023 · $35k · revenue +12%
  • AF
    AMERICAN FEDERATION OF LABOR MEMPHIS AFL-CIO LABOR COUNCIL
    2× · 2023–2024 · $26k · revenue +49%
  • P
    PORTER-LEATH
    4× · 2018–2025 · $21k · revenue -18%

Funded once

  • NA
    NATIONAL ASSOCIATION FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF COLORED PEOPLE
    one grant, 2023 · $11k
  • ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC
    one grant, 2024 · $6k · revenue +10%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field
04the grantee network

6 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
6/6
Grantees still filing
4/6
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

AMERICAN FEDERATION OF LABOR MEMPHIS AFL-CIO LABOR COUNCIL: $26,000 · OtherAMERICAN FEDERATION OF LABOR MEMPHIS AFL-CIO LABOR COUNCILPORTER-LEATH: $20,500 · OtherPORTER-LEATHNATIONAL ASSOCIATION FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF COLORED PEOPLE: $11,080 · OtherNATIONAL ASSOCIATION FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF COLORED PEOPLECHRIS HOPE FOUNDATION: $34,900 · HealthCHRIS HOPE FOUNDATIONST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $6,000 · HealthST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INCTEAMSTER NATIONAL BLACK CACUS MEMPHIS DELTA CHAPTER: $13,200 · Youth DevelopmentTEAMSTER NATI…
Other$57,580Health$40,900Youth Development$13,200

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCHRIS HOPE FOUNDATION: $34,900 over 4y, 7.7% of budgetAMERICAN FEDERATION OF LABOR MEMPHIS AFL-CIO LABOR COUNCIL: $26,000 over 2y, 6.3% of budgetPORTER-LEATH: $20,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTEAMSTER NATIONAL BLACK CACUS MEMPHIS DELTA CHAPTER: $13,200 over 2y, 11% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $6,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization International Brotherhood of 667 Tcwh funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from International Brotherhood of 667 Tcwh. Bigger dots raise more.

2023
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to International Brotherhood of 667 Tcwh?

    Find your warmest path to International Brotherhood of 667 Tcwh through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 6 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on International Brotherhood of 667 Tcwh’s filings →

    More from the funding graph