Skip to content
International Brotherhood of 42 Joint Council at a glanceMostly funded, not a grantmaker: see who funds it →

· Public charity

International Brotherhood of 42 Joint Council

To organize all workers and to secure improved wages, hours, working conditions and other economic advantages through organizing, negotiations, and collective bargaining.

$45k
Granted FY2024still arriving
2
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$20k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Philanthropy$77kEmployment$46kPublic Safety & Disaster$20kEducation$7kHousing & Shelter$7k
02FY2024 · 2 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 2 grants below total $35,000, the rows itemized in this filing. The $45,245 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $10,245 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.
$20,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$3.6M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Teamsters Local 542$20,000
Teamster JC 42 Charities$15,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 87% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%Colettes Children Home: $7k → 10%Joint Council of Teamsters #7: $10k → 10%CA Conf on Apprenticeship: $10k → 14%Teamsters Local 431: $10k → 19%Teamsters Local 572: $6k → 14%Teamster JC 42 Charities: $25k → 14%Teamster JC 42 Charities: $15k → 14%Teamster JC 42 Charities: $11k → 14%Teamster JC 42 Charities: $10k → 14%Teamster JC 42 Charities: $9k → 14%Teamster JC 42 Charities: $7k → 14%LAANE: $10k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
International Brotherhood of 42 Joint Council

To organize all workers and to secure improved wages, hours, working conditions and other economic advantages through organizing, negotiations, and collective bargaining.

—
2
Teamsters Local 1932

It is the mission of teamsters local 1932 to provide the best possible service to all our members with integrity and equality; to advance the social, economic, and educational welfare of the membership; to promote professional working…

—
3
International Brotherhood of 577 Tcwh

To organize all workers and to secure improved wages, hours, working conditions and other economic advantages through organization, negotiations and collective bargaining.

—
4
International Brotherhood of Teamsters Local 631

To organize all workers and to seure improved wages, hours, working conditions and other economic advantages through organizing, negotiations, and collective bargaining.

—
5
International Brotherhood of Teamsters Local 2010

To organize clerical employees of the university of california system in order to secure fair wages and better working conditions.

—
6
International Brotherhood of Teamsters Local Union No 330

To organize workers for their moral, economic and social advancement.

—
7
International Brotherhood of 988 Tcwh

To organize and represent all workers and to secure improved wages, hours, working condition and other economic advantages through organization, negotiations and collective bargaining.

—
8
International Brotherhood of Teamsters Local Union No 238

To organize all workers for the economic, moral and social advancement of their condition and status.

—
9
Contra Costa Labor Council Afl-Cio

The council is a federation of approximately 85 affiliated unions. the organizaton engages in a wide range of activities. the activities are designed to improve the lives of working families, to bring economic justice to the workplace, and…

—
10
California State Council of Service Employees

The council coordinated the efforts of affiliated local unions and assisted their organizations work, bettering the working conditions of their members.

—
11
International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers Local Union 72

Local Labor Union Representing Members of the International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers

—
12
International Brotherhood of Teamsters Local 957

Labor union

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Teamsters' Joint Council No 7; the most unlike its peers is California Conference On Apprenticeship. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 9 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
5/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

The Southern California & Southern Nevada Teamsters JC 42 Charity Fund Inc: $76,534 · PhilanthropyThe Southern California & Southern Nevada Teamsters JC …INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF TEAMSTERS: $20,000 · OtherINTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF TEAMSTERSCALIFORNIA CONFERENCE ON APPRENTICESHIP: $10,000 · OtherCALIFORNIA CONFERENCE ON APPRENTICESHIPTeamsters' Joint Council No 7: $10,000 · OtherTeamsters' Joint Council No 7INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF TEAMSTERS 431: $10,000 · OtherINTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF TEAMSTERS 431Intl Teamsters Womens Caucu: $7,034 · OtherIntl Teamsters Womens CaucuInternational Brotherhood of 572 TCWH: $5,500 · OtherInternational Brotherhood of 572 TCWHLOS ANGELES ALLIANCE FOR A NEW ECONOMY: $10,000 · HealthCOLETTE'S CHILDREN'S HOME INC: $7,000 · Housing & Shelter
Philanthropy$76,534Other$62,534Health$10,000Housing & Shelter$7,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetThe Southern California & Southern Nevada Teamsters JC 42 Charity Fund Inc: $76,534 over 6y, 22% of budgetINTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF TEAMSTERS: $20,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetCALIFORNIA CONFERENCE ON APPRENTICESHIP: $10,000 over 1y, 9.0% of budgetLOS ANGELES ALLIANCE FOR A NEW ECONOMY: $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetTeamsters' Joint Council No 7: $10,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetINTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF TEAMSTERS 431: $10,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetCOLETTE'S CHILDREN'S HOME INC: $7,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetInternational Brotherhood of 572 TCWH: $5,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization International Brotherhood of 42 Joint Council funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from International Brotherhood of 42 Joint Council. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–24
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 9 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on International Brotherhood of 42 Joint Council’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home