· Private foundation
International Association for Plant Taxonomy (Usa)
The organization promotes all aspects of botanical systematics and its significance to the understanding and values of biodiversity through the publication and online access of its quarterly journal and handbook series which provide outlets for small papers and large reference works, news, reviews, the latest code, etc.
What it funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.
Where the money goes
Grants by size, and the largest recipients.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Individual grant recipient | $2,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $2,000 |
| BONIFACIA BENITEZ DE BERTONI | $2,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $2,000 |
| PETER ATTA-ADJEI JUNIOR | $2,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $2,000 |
| JENNY OLGA ARREA PAUCAR | $2,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $2,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $2,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $2,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $2,000 |
| ARUN KUMAR T K | $2,000 |
| MANUEL HIGINIO SANDOVAL-ORTEGA | $2,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $2,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $2,000 |
Where the grant dollars land
Across the US and around the world.
US giving: 9% of grant dollars ($60k). The 91% that went abroad ($578k) is mapped below.
Which US states its grants reach
Beyond the US: 91% of all-years giving ($578k)
51 countries, by the recipient’s country on the filing.
How this is measured
Who it funds again
Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.
6 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down; 49 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 4% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $97k went to new ones.
How this is measured
Backed again, and grew
- IGIndividual grant recipient2× · 2023–2025 · $12k
- AGAUGUSTO GIARETTA DE OLIVEIRA2× · 2022–2024 · $4k
- IGIndividual grant recipient2× · 2022–2024 · $4k
Funded once
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2022 · $12k
- JEJEAN EVANS ISRAL CODIJAone grant, 2022 · $10k
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2022 · $10k
How this is measured
Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
1 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2020–2025.
Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.
How this is measured
Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2020 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 1 of the 249 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.
Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee
Showing the 200 largest grantees by grant value.
Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding
A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
How much its grantees rely on government
Each dot is one organization International Association for Plant Taxonomy (Usa) funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from International Association for Plant Taxonomy (Usa). Bigger dots raise more.
How this is measured
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to International Association for Plant Taxonomy (Usa)?
Find your warmest path to International Association for Plant Taxonomy (Usa) through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.
Play a game based on International Association for Plant Taxonomy (Usa)’s filings →