Skip to content

· Public charity

International Anesthesia Research Society

The INTERNATIONAL ANESTHESIA RESEARCH SOCIETY (iars) is a nonpolitical, not-for-profit medical society founded in 1922 to advance and support scientific research and education related to anesthesia and the improvement of patient care through research.

$1.0M
Granted FY2022
6
Grants FY2022
5
States reached
$175k
Largest

Read this first · the figures below need context

50% of International Anesthesia Research Society’s FY2024 grant dollars went to The Board Of Trustees Of The Leland Stanford Junior University, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2024 names 1 organization directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it. Everything below is therefore FY2022, the last year International Anesthesia Research Society named its own grantees at scale: 6 organizations, $1M. It is dated, not current.

Organizations named directly on the return

5
’17
3
’18
4
’19
2
’20
2
’21
6
’22
3
’23
1
’24

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Health$2.8MScience & Tech$1.7MEducation$1.7M
02FY2022 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$175,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$35M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HEALTH SCIENCE CENTER AT HOUSTON$175,000
UNIVERSITY OF VERMONT AND STATE AGRICULTURAL COLLEGE$175,000
WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY ST LOUIS$175,000
MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL$175,000
WEILL MEDICAL COLLEGE OF CORNELL UNIVERSITY$170,000
UT SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER$139,597
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 82% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL: $175k → 8%UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH: $175k → 11%STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY: $175k → 7%CEDARS-SINAI MEDICAL CENTER: $175k → 14%WEILL MEDICAL COLLEGE OF CORNELL UNIVERSITY: $170k → 17%UT SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER: $140k → 14%UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HEALTH SCIENCE CENTER AT HOUSTON: $175k → 16%WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY IN ST LOUIS: $750k → 21%UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON: $88k → 10%DUKE UNIVERSITY: $175k → 11%UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA: $175k → 13%UNIVERSITY OF UTAH: $175k → 8%EMORY UNIVERSITY: $175k → 14%SOCIETY OF CARDIOVASCULAR ANESTHESIOLOGISTS (SCA): $200k → 14%UNIVERSITY OF VERMONT AND STATE AGRICULTURAL COLLEGE: $175k → 10%UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND SCHOOL OF MEDICINE: $750k → 19%STANFORD UNIVERSITY: $175k → 7%WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY IN ST LOUIS: $350k → 21%DUKE UNIVERSITY: $175k → 11%SOCIETY OF CARDIOVASCULAR ANESTHESIOLOGISTS (SCA): $50k → 14%WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY IN ST LOUIS: $175k → 21%WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY ST LOUIS: $175k → 21%WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY IN ST LOUIS: $175k → 21%WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY IN ST LOUIS: $88k → 21%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

VT
IL
WI
NY
MA
PA
CA
UT
MO
MD
NC
GA
TX

Grants abroad, by region: $349k on the FY2024 return

Schedule F, as filed: 1 region. The IRS asks for region and purpose, not the recipient, so no country or grantee can be named here.

5$349k · 100% · 2 grants

Stated purpose: 2024 IARS MENTORED RESEARCH AWARD

How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving. Grants abroad on Schedule F are filed by region, purpose and amount with no recipient name, so they are shown by region and cannot be placed on the country map or matched to a grantee.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

52%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$3.0M · 4 repeat orgs$2.7M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +76% since the first grant, against +32% for those funded once.

4 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2022, 2 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2022 (too recent to call). Read against FY2022, the last year this funder named its own grantees directly; its giving has since run through a sponsor, which reports no donor behind each grant.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

4
6

Total granted

$3.0M
$1.6M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+76%
+32%

Still filing today

75%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 0% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $175k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY
    5× · 2017–2022 · $1.7M · revenue +76%
  • DUKE UNIVERSITY
    4× · 2017–2023 · $700k · revenue +51%
  • SO
    SOCIETY OF CARDIOVASCULAR ANESTHESIOLOGISTS
    2× · 2017–2018 · $250k · revenue +79%

Funded once

  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND COLLEGE PARK
    one grant, 2018 · $750k
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO
    one grant, 2020 · $350k
  • EU
    Emory Universitygraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $175k · revenue +32%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
New York University

Nyu is a private university with approximately 60,000 matriculating students in 20 schools and institutes. nyu's primary missions are education, research and scholarship, and patient care.

Education
2
University of Southern California

The central mission of the university of southern california is the development of human beings and society as a whole through the cultivation and enrichment of the human mind and spirit. the principal means by which our mission is…

Education
3
University of Minnesota Physicians

University of minnesota physicians serves as the integrated group practice for the university of minnesota medical school full-time faculty to provide the highest quality healthcare to patients and their families.university of minnesota…

Health
4
University of Miami

See Form 990, Part I, Line 1, Description of Organization Mission.

Education
5
Southern California University of Health Sciences

The mission of southern california university of health sciences (scu) is to educate students as competent, caring and successful practitioners of integrative healthcare. the university is committed to providing excellence in academics,…

Education
6
Drexel University

Drexel university fulfills its founder's vision of preparing each new generation of students for productive professional and civic lives while also focusing its collective expertise on solving society's greatest problems. drexel is an…

Education
7
Trustees of the University of Pennsylvania

The trustees of the university of pennsylvania (the "university") sees itself as having a public service mission. in such regard, the university aims to provide a rich and diverse educational environment for its students; to pioneer…

Education
8
Case Western Reserve University

Case Western Reserve University is an independent, research-oriented university with broadly based strengths in health, including medicine, nursing and dentistry; in engineering; in the arts and sciences; and in law, management and social…

Education
9
Thomas Jefferson University

Thomas jefferson university ("tju") is a comprehensive university with preeminence in transdisciplinary, experiential professional education, research and discovery, delivering exceptional value for the 21st century students with…

Education
10
Rush University Medical Center

The mission of Rush is to improve the health of the individuals and diverse communities we serve through the integration of outstanding patient care, education, research and community partnerships.

Health
11
Cornell University

Education, research, medical services and other public services.

Education
12
The Johns Hopkins Hospital

For more than 125 years, the mission of the johns hopkins hospital has been to lead the world in the diagnosis and treatment of disease and to train tomorrow's great physicians, nurses and scientists. above all, we aim to provide the…

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Washington University; the most unlike its peers is Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 19 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
9/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY: $1,712,500 · EducationWASHINGTON UNIVERSITYDUKE UNIVERSITY: $700,000 · EducationDUKE UNIVERSITYTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY: $350,000 · EducationTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVER…Emory University: $175,000 · EducationEmory UniversityUNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH: $175,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH+1 more: $20,218 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND COLLEGE PARK: $750,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND COLLEGE PARKUNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HEALTH SCIENCE CENTER HOUSTON: $350,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HEALTH SCIENCE CENTER HOUST…UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO: $350,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCOUNIVERSITY OF UTAH: $175,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF UTAHUNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA AT CHAPEL HILL: $175,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA AT CHAPEL HILLMASS GENERAL BRIGHAM INCORPORATED: $175,000 · OtherMASS GENERAL BRIGHAM INCORPORATEDUNIVERSITY OF VERMONT AND STATE AGRICULTURAL COLLEGE: $175,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF VERMONT AND STATE AGRICULTURAL CO…Weill Medical College of Cornell Univers: $170,000 · OtherWeill Medical College of Cornell UniversTHE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTE: $139,597 · OtherTHE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CE…University of Wisconsin Madison: $87,500 · OtherSOCIETY OF CARDIOVASCULAR ANESTHESIOLOGISTS: $249,700 · HealthCEDARS-SINAI MEDICAL CENTER: $175,000 · Health+1 more: $14,404 · Health
Education$3,132,718Other$2,547,097Health$439,104

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%grantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetWASHINGTON UNIVERSITY: $1,712,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetDUKE UNIVERSITY: $700,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY: $350,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCEDARS-SINAI MEDICAL CENTER: $175,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEmory University: $175,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH: $175,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK: $20,218 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetChildren's Hospital Corporation: $14,404 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds DUKE UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds SOCIETY OF CARDIOVASCULAR ANESTHESIOLOGISTS ↗
  • Who funds CEDARS-SINAI MEDICAL CENTER ↗
  • Who funds Emory University ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH ↗
  • Who funds THE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK ↗
  • Who funds Children's Hospital Corporation ↗

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization International Anesthesia Research Society funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from International Anesthesia Research Society. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%8%15%22%30%share of the org’s income from government →median 10%
  • Children's Hospital Corporation: 10% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 19 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2022, released 2022. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on International Anesthesia Research Society’s filings →

More from the funding graph