Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Interfaith Council for Peace & Justice

Interfaith Council for Peace and Justice (ICPJ) empowers our communities, people of faith and congregations, mutual aid groups, network organizations, and individual volunteers, to make radical systemic change with love within Washtenaw County and across Michigan.

$77k
Granted FY2024still arriving
5
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$20k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20212024.

Public Benefit$89kReligion$51kEmployment$18kCrime & Legal$18k
02FY2024 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 5 grants below total $48,142 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $76,800 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $28,658 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k4 grants · $29k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $20k
$7,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$393k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$19,642
We Want Green Too$8,000
Cadillac Urban Gardens$7,000
Urban Core Collective$7,000
The Strategic Coyote LLC$6,500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY22–22, $20k) land where the poverty rate runs at 19%, against an area that typically sits at 17%. 50% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 17%One Love Global Inc: $10k → 16%Urban Neighborhoods Initiative: $10k → 21%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Workin Rootz

Our mission is to revitalize and re-engage the community by reconnecting to the Earth through land stewardship, food sovereignty, sustainability, and herbalism.

Environment
2
Dream of Detroit

Dream of Detroit is combining community organizing with strategic housing and land development to build a healthy community and empower a marginalized neighborhood on the Westside of Detroit.

Human Services
3
Summer in the City

Summer in the City strives to improve and expand community service in Metro Detroit. By bringing a diverse group of young people together to invest their energy in Detroit, Summer in the City programs address the immediate needs of city…

Philanthropy
4
Project Grow

Project Grow provides over 400 Ann Arbor area residents with space and know-how, educational events and inspiration to grow their own food.

5
Impact100 Detroit Impact100 Metro Detroit

Impact100 Metro Detroit is working to be a leader in collective philanthropy and to build a strong presence in metro Detroit which includes specifically the counties of Macomb, Oakland and Wayne. The members are a group of women who want…

Human Services
6
Impact Oakland Now
Community Improvement
7
Michigan Urban Farming Initiative

To engage members of the Michigan community in urban agriculture

Food & Nutrition
8
Volunteers Improving Neighborhood Environments Inc

The organization is committed to developing a sustainable community food system by bringing together diverse groups of people, with a focus on youth development, to establish community gardens, urban agriculture and community green spaces.…

Religion
9
Urban Community Network

Urban Community Network UCN is a non-profit organization that promotes safe, healthy sustainable communities where youth and their families can thrive.

Human Services
10
Urban Farming

Urban Farming is non-partisan and non-denominational. The Urban Farming mission is to Create an Abundance of Food for All in Our Generation by supporting and encouraging the establishment of organic gardens on unused land and space, while…

Food & Nutrition
11
Black Seeds

prove asset to organic food

Food & Nutrition
12
Detroit Black Community Food Sovereignty Network

DBCFSN works to build self-reliance and food security in Detroits black community by influencing public policy promoting urban agriculture, promoting healthy eating and encouraging youth to pursue careers in food related fields.

Food & Nutrition

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Urban Core Collective and the most unlike its peers is Cadillac Urban Gardens. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 14 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
3/9
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Individual grant recipient — $38,782 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient — $17,854 · OtherIndividual grant recipientAnn Arbor Friends Meeting — $12,019 · OtherAnn Arbor Friends MeetingMICHIGAN STUDENT POWER ALLIANCE — $10,000 · OtherMICHIGAN STUDENT POWER ALLIANCEThe Strategic Coyote LLC — $6,500 · OtherThe Strategic Coyote LLCAnchoRRa — $11,250 · Community ImprovementAnchoRRaDETROIT CHANGE INITIATIVE — $10,000 · Community ImprovementDETROIT CHANGE INITIATI…GEORGIA STREET COMMUNITY COLLECTIVE INC — $7,500 · Community ImprovementGEORGIA STREET COMMUNIT…URBAN CORE COLLECTIVE — $7,000 · Community ImprovementURBAN CORE COLLECTIVEUrban Neighborhood Initiatives Inc — $10,000 · Human ServicesUrban Neighb…ONE LOVE GLOBAL — $10,000 · Human ServicesONE LOVE GLO…WE WANT GREEN TOO — $18,000 · EmploymentWE WANT GRE…ALLIED MEDIA PROJECTS INC — $10,000 · Arts & CultureCADILLAC URBAN GARDENS — $7,000 · Food & Nutrition
Other$85,155Community Improvement$35,750Human Services$20,000Employment$18,000Arts & Culture$10,000Food & Nutrition$7,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetWE WANT GREEN TOO — $18,000 over 2y, 1.1% of budgetAnchoRRa — $11,250 over 1y, 10% of budgetUrban Neighborhood Initiatives Inc — $10,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetDETROIT CHANGE INITIATIVE — $10,000 over 1y, 2.4% of budgetONE LOVE GLOBAL — $10,000 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetALLIED MEDIA PROJECTS INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGEORGIA STREET COMMUNITY COLLECTIVE INC — $7,500 over 1y, 6.2% of budgetURBAN CORE COLLECTIVE — $7,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a set of overlaps that mostly run through you, not between each other.

The Skillman FoundationMI15.6× affinity5 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Skillman Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Interfaith Council for Peace & Justice funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    04Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Interfaith Council for Peace & Justice?

    Find your warmest path to Interfaith Council for Peace & Justice through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 14 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2025) is on record and reports $6k of grant expense, but none of it to a named recipient. On a Form 990 that can mean grants abroad, filed by region only (Schedule F), grants under $5,000, which are not itemized, or a schedule referenced as an attachment the e-file does not carry. The figures above are therefore from FY2024, the most recent year this funder named its grantees.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph