Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Interchurch Medical Assistance Inc

INTERCHURCH MEDICAL ASSISTANCE (IMA WORLD HEALTH) OR (IMA) ADVANCES HEALTH AND HEALING FOR VULNERABLE AND MARGINALIZED PEOPLE IN THE DEVELOPING WORLD.

$21M
Granted FY2024still arriving
9
Grants FY2024still arriving
5
States reached
$9.2M
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20222024.

Health$46MInternational$8.8MScience & Tech$334kCrime & Legal$264kEducation$230kReligion$206k
02FY2024 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $10k–50k1 grant · $34k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $150k
  • $250k+6 grants · $23M
$1,204,810
Median grant
5
States reached
$71M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
JSI Research & Training Institute Inc$9,211,674
PATHFINDER INC$9,129,769
Coop for Assist& Relief Every Inc$1,791,091
Goal$1,270,213
GOAL USA FUND$1,204,810
Pres & Fellows of Harvard College$250,000
JHU Medicine$74,865
Johns Hopkins University$74,865
The Carter Center Inc$33,565
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY22–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 58% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%PATHFINDER INC: $9.5M → 8%JSI Research & Training Institute Inc: $9.2M → 16%GOAL USA FUND: $472k → 13%Coop for Assist& Relief Every Inc: $1.8M → 17%Goal: $1.3M → 14%PRODEK: $206k → 15%Heal Africa: $219k → 11%COOPERATIVE FOR ASSISTANCE AND RELIEF EVERYWHERE: $813k → 13%THE CARTER CENTER INC: $141k → 14%AMERICAN BAR ASSOCIATION FUND FOR JUSTICE: $22k → 14%POPULATION MEDIA CENTER: $76k → 10%Johns Hopkins University: $56k → 19%PATHFINDER INC: $9.1M → 8%JSI RESEARCH & TRAINING INSTITUTE INC: $7.9M → 16%COOPERATIVE FOR ASSISTANCE & RELIEF EVERY: $1.7M → 17%GOAL USA FUND: $1.2M → 14%The Carter Center Inc: $118k → 14%JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY: $98k → 19%PATHFINDER INC: $4.4M → 8%JSI Research & Training Institute Inc: $5.5M → 16%GOAL USA FUND: $661k → 14%The Carter Center Inc: $34k → 14%JHU Medicine: $75k → 19%Pres & Fellows of Harvard College: $250k → 8%American BAR Association Fund for Justice: $242k → 14%Johns Hopkins University: $75k → 19%PANZI FOUNDATION: $369k → 14%BAO SYSTEMS: $334k → 14%PANZI FOUNDATION: $98k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

VT
IL
MI
NY
MA
MD
DC
GA
FL

Grants abroad, by region — $4.2M on the FY2024 return

Schedule F, as filed: 3 regions. The IRS asks for region and purpose, not the recipient, so no country or grantee can be named here.

Central America and the Caribbean$2.8M · 67% · 6 grants

Stated purpose: Support for maternal and child health services in underserved communities. · Strengthening family health and education services in Haiti. · Delivery of integrated primary healthcare in rural Haiti.

Sub-Saharan Africa$933k · 22% · 10 grants

Stated purpose: Support for advocacy and technical assistance on HIV/AIDS and public health issues in Africa. · Operational research on health systems and innovations in Africa. · Technical assistance and research support for agricultural development.

South America$458k · 11% · 10 grants

Stated purpose: Support for sustainable cocoa production and value chain strengthening. · Health education and services focused on women and children in West Africa. · Training and skills development for sustainable cocoa farming.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving. Grants abroad on Schedule F are filed by region, purpose and amount with no recipient name, so they are shown by region and cannot be placed on the country map or matched to a grantee.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$54M · 7 repeat orgs$1.2M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +26% since the first grant, against +19% for the ones you funded once.

7 repeat relationships — 6 still active in FY2024, 1 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

7
6

Total granted

$54M
$1.1M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+26%
+19%

Still filing today

100%
67%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $75k went to new ones.

50%100%’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’22’23’24
InternationalEducationCrime & LegalOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • JSI RESEARCH & TRAINING INSTITUTE INC
    3× · 2022–2024 · $23M · revenue +48%
  • GU
    GOAL USA INC
    3× · 2022–2024 · $3.6M · revenue ×12 · 83% of their budget
  • PF
    PANZI FOUNDATION
    2× · 2022–2023 · $467k · revenue +36%

Funded once

  • BS
    BAO SYSTEMS
    one grant, 2023 · $334k
  • AB
    American Bar Associationgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $242k · revenue +69%
  • HA
    Heal Africa
    one grant, 2022 · $219k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
International Aids Vaccine Initiative Inc

A nonprofit scientific research organization that develops vaccines and antibodies for hiv, tuberculosis, and emerging infectious diseases.

International
2
Foreign Policy Research Institute

The foreign policy research institute (frpi) is dedicated to producing the highest quality scholarship and nonpartisan policy analysis focused on crucial foreign policy and national security challenges facing the united states. we educate…

International
3
Actionaid Usa

Actionaid is an international network building a just, equitable, and sustainable world in solidarity with communities on the frontlines of poverty and injustice. actionaid usa is the u.s. branch of actionaid international, which works in…

Social Science
4
Pact Inc

Pact is a nonprofit organization that builds evidence-based, data-driven, and community-led solutions for human development (continued in schedule o)

International
5
Intrahealth International Inc

Our mission is to improve the performance of health workers and strengthen the systems in which they work.

Health
6
The Rand Corporation

Help improve policy and decision making through research and analysis.

Public Benefit
7
World Resources Institute

Wri is committed to creating change that improves people's lives and ensures the natural world can thrive. (see schedule o)wri's bold vision requires a formula for success we call "count it. change it. scale it.":- count it: our work is…

International
8
Project Hope - the People-to-People Health Foundation Inc

To conduct and support programs and activities aimed at solving some of the world's greatest public health challenges, with a specific focus on enabling health workers to have the greatest possible impact on the health of the people they…

International
9
Fajr Scientific

To provide multi-specialty surgical care, humanitarian aid and educational support to people in low- and middle-income countries.

Science & Tech
10
Gavi Alliance

To save lives and protect people's health by increasing equitable and sustainable use of vaccines.

International
11
Clinton Health Access Initiative Inc

For over 20 years, chai's mission has been to save lives and improve health outcomes in low-and middle-income countries around the world. we do this by enabling the government and private sector to strengthen and sustain quality health…

International
12
Research Triangle Institute

Research Triangle Institute is one of the world's leading research institutes, dedicated to improving the human condition by turning knowledge into practice. Our staff of more than 5,300 provides research and technical (continued on…

Science & Tech

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Jsi Research & Training Institute Inc and the most unlike its peers is Vollmer Foundation Inc Attn Prodek. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 15 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/12
Grantees still filing
8/12
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

PATHFINDER INTERNATIONAL — $22,963,821 · InternationalPATHFINDER INTERNATIONALCOOPERATIVE FOR ASSISTANCE AND RELIEF EVERYWHERE INC — $4,291,088 · InternationalCOOPERATIVE FOR ASSISTANCE AND RELIEF EVERYWHERE INCGOAL USA INC — $3,607,502 · InternationalGOAL USA INC+2 more — $759,422 · InternationalJSI RESEARCH & TRAINING INSTITUTE INC — $22,621,966 · OtherJSI RESEARCH & TRAINING INSTITUTE INC+5 more — $1,076,465 · OtherPresident and Fellows of Harvard College — $250,000 · EducationJOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY — $228,524 · EducationPOPULATION MEDIA CENTER INC — $75,945 · EducationAmerican Bar Association Fund for Justice and Education — $21,870 · Crime & Legal
International$31,621,833Other$23,698,431Education$554,469Crime & Legal$21,870

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetPATHFINDER INTERNATIONAL — $22,963,821 over 3y, 8.0% of budgetJSI RESEARCH & TRAINING INSTITUTE INC — $22,621,966 over 3y, 2.5% of budgetCOOPERATIVE FOR ASSISTANCE AND RELIEF EVERYWHERE INC — $4,291,088 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetGOAL USA INC — $3,607,502 over 3y, 83% of budgetPANZI FOUNDATION — $466,623 over 2y, 15% of budgetTHE CARTER CENTER INC — $292,799 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetPresident and Fellows of Harvard College — $250,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Bar Association — $242,480 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetJOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY — $228,524 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetPOPULATION MEDIA CENTER INC — $75,945 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetAmerican Bar Association Fund for Justice and Education — $21,870 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Vanguard Charitable Endowment ProgramPA7.1× affinity4 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Interchurch Medical Assistance Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 20%6%23%51%90%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 12%
  • Jsi Research & Training Institute Inc69% of income from government
  • Johns Hopkins University12% of income from government
  • President and Fellows of Harvard College7% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 15 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph