· Public charity
Indiana Soybean Alliance Inc
The overall mission of the indiana soybean alliance (isa) is to proactively work with partners to improve the opportunities for indiana soybean farmers.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- $10k–50k5 grants · $155k
- $50k–250k6 grants · $675k
- $250k+4 grants · $3.5M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| PURDUE UNIVERSITY | $988,908 |
| US MEAT EXPORT FEDERATION | $983,600 |
| US SOYBEAN EXPORT COUNCIL | $789,675 |
| US POULTRY & EGG ASSOCIATION | $752,885 |
| OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY | $225,000 |
| SIRONIX RENEWABLES INC | $100,000 |
| AMERICAN SOYBEAN ASSOCIATION | $100,000 |
| OUROBIO TRANSFORM LLC | $100,000 |
| FIICZA | $75,000 |
| HOGAN CONSULTING | $75,000 |
| UNIVERSITY OF NOTRE DAME | $42,500 |
| PHEASANTS FOREVER INC | $40,000 |
| CENTRAL INDIANA CORPORATE PARTNERSHIP INC | $37,500 |
| NATURE CONSERVANCY | $25,000 |
| UNITED SOYBEAN BOARD | $10,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 92% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +35% since the first grant, against 0% for the ones you funded once.
18 repeat relationships — 11 still active in FY2025, 7 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 97% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $140k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- USUNITED STATES MEAT EXPORT FEDERATION INC9× · 2017–2025 · $5.7M · revenue +26%
- USUNITED STATES SOYBEAN EXPORT COUNCIL INC5× · 2021–2025 · $3.6M · revenue +48%
- ASAMERICAN SOYBEAN ASSOCIATION5× · 2017–2025 · $625k · revenue +60%
Funded once
- BMBATTELLE MEMORIAL INSTITUTEone grant, 2024 · $200k · revenue 0%
- TITENSTECH INCone grant, 2023 · $135k
- BHBECKS HYBRIDSone grant, 2024 · $100k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The iowa soybean association (isa) is driven to deliver increased soybean demand through market development and new uses, farmer-focused research and results, timely information and know-how, and policy initiatives enabling farmers and the…
The national association of state departments of agriculture (nasda) enhances american food and agricultural communities through policy, partnerships and public engagement.
The overall mission of the indiana soybean alliance (isa) is to proactively work with partners to improve the opportunities for indiana soybean farmers. to accomplish this mission, in 2023 the isa board of directors modified the strategic…
Advance science, engineering, and innovation throughout the world for the benefit of all. the world's largest multidisciplinary scientific society and a leading publisher of cutting-edge research through its science family of journals,…
American gas association's (the association) mission is to develop and advocate for informed, innovative, and durable policy that fulfills our nation's energy needs, environmental aspirations and economic potential. we are committed to…
The u.s. grains council is dedicated to developing markets, enabling trade, and improving lives by fostering an inclusive organization of grain producers, agribusiness organizations, and international customers, while promoting free, fair,…
Airlines for america (a4a) vigorously advocates for america's airlines as models of safety, customer service, and environmental responsibility; and as the indispensable network that drives our nation's economy and global…
The principal business and purpose of this association shall be to unite those individuals and organizations engaged in the artificial insemination of cattle and other livestock into an affiliated federation operating under self-imposed…
Iatp works locally and globally at the intersection of policy and practice to ensure fair and sustainable food, farm and trade systems.
To promote the common business interests of member companies without profit and without the inuring of income to the benefit of any member company or individual. to present the executive, legislative, judicial and regulatory bodies…
The mission of the united states national committee of the international dairy federation is to represent the us dairy sector worldwide by providing the best global source of scientific expertise and knowledge in support of the development…
As an organization, the institute of food technologists is focusing its work in four main areas, or "roles and goals." each is wide-reaching and helps to advance our mission.steward for the profession and its community - provide learning,…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Clean Fuels Alliance America and the most unlike its peers is University of Notre Dame du Lac. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 41 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds UNITED STATES MEAT EXPORT FEDERATION INC ↗
- Who funds USPOULTRY & EGG ASSOCIATIONINC ↗
- Who funds UNITED STATES SOYBEAN EXPORT COUNCIL INC ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN SOYBEAN ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds SOY AQUACULTURE ALLIANCE INC ↗
- Who funds University of Notre Dame du Lac ↗
- Who funds BATTELLE MEMORIAL INSTITUTE ↗
- Who funds CLEAN FUELS ALLIANCE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds CENTRAL INDIANA CORPORATE PARTNERSHIP INC ↗
- Who funds CLEAN FUELS ALLIANCE AMERICA ↗
- Who funds SOY TRANSPORTATION COALITION ↗
- Who funds MANCHESTER UNIVERSITY INC ↗
- Who funds INDIANA ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT ASSOCIATION INC ↗
- Who funds FUTURE FARMERS OF AMERICA BARNESVILLE MN ALUMNI AS ↗
- Who funds PHEASANTS FOREVER INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a set of overlaps that mostly run through you, not between each other.
Open a dossier: Indiana Corn Marketing Council
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Indiana Soybean Alliance Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.