· Public charity
Indiana Farm Bureau Inc
Indiana farm bureau, our mission is to protect and enhance the future of agriculture and our communities.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 4 grants below total $97,171 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $285,242 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $188,071 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2024
- $10k–50k3 grants · $42k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $55k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| INDIANA AGRICULTURAL LAW FOUNDATION | $55,000 |
| FARM BUREAU FOUNDATION | $18,800 |
| INDIANA COOPERATIVE DEVELOPMENT CENTER | $12,353 |
| PURDUE UNIVERSITY | $11,018 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–20, $5k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
6 repeat relationships — 4 still active in FY2024, 2 since wound down.
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- IAIndiana Agricultural Law Foundation Inc8× · 2017–2024 · $375k · revenue +72% · 37% of their budget
- ICINDIANA COOPERATIVE DEVELOPMENT CENTER3× · 2021–2024 · $40k · revenue +27%
- GFGLEANERS FOOD BANK OF INDIANA INC2× · 2019–2020 · $10k · revenue +80%
Funded once
- ISIndiana State Fair Foundation Incgraduatedone grant, 2017 · $13k · revenue +348%
- KFKENTUCKY FARM BUREAU EDUCATION FOUNDATION INCone grant, 2021 · $10k · revenue -75%
- PTPROTECT THE HARVESTone grant, 2018 · $6k · revenue -87%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
An agribusiness network advocate, representing members' interests within all levels of government and keeping members informed of the latest industry trends and news.
By drawing on varied resources within public agencies and the private sector, we hope to provide hunger relief for those in need throughout Indiana.
The american farm bureau federation is the voice of agriculture (r). we are farm and ranch families working together to build a sustainable future of safe and abundant food, fiber and renewable fuel for our nation and the world.
The mission of the indiana ffa foundation is to support, fund, and promote the programs and objectives of the indiana ffa association and indiana ffa leadership center.
Michigan farm bureau (mfb) is a member directed agricultural organization whose purpose is to represent, protect, and enhance the business, economic, social, and educational interests of our members located throughout the state of michigan.
PIFFs mission is to change the narrative around food and farming in Indiana by increasing farm viability and convening partners for collaborative, systems-level change.
To increase net income of farmers and ranchers and to improve the quality of rural life and work for the betterment of agriculture.
The indiana food & fuel association (iffa) is dedicated to advancing the interests of indiana's fuel marketers, convenience and food retailers, and related industry partners. founded on the belief that collaboration drives success, iffa…
To create a vibrant future for agriculture, farm families and their communities.
To improve the economic well being of agriculture and enrich the quality of farm family life
The indiana beef cattle association will build a better beef industry and stronger communities by forging partnerships to enhance profitability, protect the environment and increase consumer demand for a safe and healthy beef product.
To support agriculture through outreach and educational opportunities.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Indiana State Fair Foundation Inc and the most unlike its peers is Indiana Agricultural Law Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 12 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Indiana Agricultural Law Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds Farm Bureau Foundation ↗
- Who funds Purdue Research Foundation ↗
- Who funds INDIANA COOPERATIVE DEVELOPMENT CENTER ↗
- Who funds Indiana State Fair Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds GLEANERS FOOD BANK OF INDIANA INC ↗
- Who funds KENTUCKY FARM BUREAU EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds PROTECT THE HARVEST ↗
- Who funds MILLION MEAL MOVEMENT INC ↗
- Who funds MIDWEST FOOD BANK NFP ↗
- Who funds NEBRASKA FARM BUREAU FEDERATION ↗
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Indiana Farm Bureau Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.