Skip to content
Impact Seven Inc at a glanceMostly funded, not a grantmaker: see who funds it →

· Public charity

Impact Seven Inc

Comprehensive impact on the population of wisconsin, with an emphasis on the rural area of the state.

$1.7M
Granted FY2022
59
Grants FY2022
2
States reached
$200k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01FY2022 · 59 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2022

  • Under $10k1 grant · $9k
  • $10k–50k50 grants · $847k
  • $50k–250k8 grants · $839k
$20,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$178M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
GORMAN KENOSHA HERITAGE HOUSE LL LLC$200,000
ENDF3DK LLC$150,000
THE CHARMANT HOTEL LLC$150,000
CHERRY WATER LLC$100,000
INDIANHEAD COMMUNITY ACTION AGENCY INC$89,150
RIVERSIDE CORPORATE WELLNESS LLC$50,000
UNION CORNERS RETAIL LLC$50,000
COAKLEY BROTHERS COMPANY$50,000
OMNIA WOOD PRODUCTS LLC$45,000
ARTISTIC PLATING COMPANY$35,000
ST MARCUS EVANGELICAL LUTHERAN CHURCH INC$30,000
OWKAANIM LLC$27,000
DAIRY SOLUTIONS CAPITAL GROUP LLC$25,000
FRESHWATER PLAZA MIXED USE LLC$25,000
VRB INVESTMENTS LLP$25,000
02The need
02

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY22–22) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 87% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%ST RITA PROPERTY LLC: $20k → 5%CROWN COURT PROPERTIES LTD: $10k → 6%MOSAIC DEVELOPMENT LLC: $10k → 7%UNITED PIONEER HOME INC: $25k → 9%OWKAANIM LLC: $27k → 9%SUPERIOR VIEW COTTAGES LLC: $15k → 9%RIGHTEOUS AUTO LLC: $10k → 10%WISCONSIN HOUSING PRESERVATION CORP LLC (ST CROIX): $20k → 10%VRB INVESTMENTS LLP: $25k → 11%SPECIALTY MANUFACTURING OF MENOMONIE LLC: $10k → 11%UNO'S MADISON LLC: $10k → 11%SILVERMINE STONE OPERATING CO LLC: $10k → 12%THE CHARMANT HOTEL LLC: $150k → 12%OMNIA WOOD PRODUCTS LLC: $45k → 12%ROSS'S SPORT SHOP INC: $10k → 12%THE NORTHERN STAR THEATRE COMPANY: $20k → 13%INDIANHEAD COMMUNITY ACTION AGENCY INC: $89k → 13%SUMMIT LAKE MANAGEMENT LLC: $25k → 15%ENDF3DK LLC: $150k → 17%LAKE TERRACE LLC: $20k → 8%SUNSHINE POINT LLC: $25k → 14%MF HOUSING PARTNERS LLC: $10k → 7%SAF MANAGEMENT INC: $20k → 9%H STREET LLC: $15k → 9%GREENWAY COTTAGES LLC: $15k → 9%WISCONSIN HOUSING PRESERVATION CORP LLC (SHELTER): $20k → 10%BAYVIEW TERRACE APARTMENT ASSOCIATES LTD: $20k → 11%RIVERSIDE CORPORATE WELLNESS LLC: $50k → 12%OMNIA WOOD PRODUCTS LLC: $14k → 12%ALDER CREEK LLC: $20k → 15%JS SOUTH LLC: $10k → 17%QCS LLC: $20k → 9%ASPEN GROVE APARTMENTS LLC: $10k → 9%UPLANDS HOMES LLC: $20k → 10%FAIRVIEW CROSSING APARTMENTS ASSOCIATES LTD: $20k → 11%ASPEN ACRES ASSISTED LIVING LLC: $15k → 15%9585 LLC-DENISE CHIN: $10k → 17%REDBLIND RENTAL LLC: $11k → 15%COAKLEY BROTHERS COMPANY: $50k → 17%GENESIS HOUSING INCORPORATED: $20k → 10%GERALD L IGNACE INDIAN HEALTH CENTER INC: $25k → 17%GORMAN KENOSHA HERITAGE HOUSE LL LLC: $200k → 10%CHERRY WATER LLC: $100k → 17%UNION CORNERS RETAIL LLC: $50k → 10%FRESHWATER PLAZA MIXED USE LLC: $25k → 17%ARTISTIC PLATING COMPANY: $35k → 17%DAIRY SOLUTIONS CAPITAL GROUP LLC: $25k → 17%ST MARCUS EVANGELICAL LUTHERAN CHURCH INC: $30k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 12% of Impact Seven Inc’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

Impact Seven Inclessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its field
04the grantee network

5 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 5 of the 57 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
5/5
Grantees still filing
4/5
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

GORMAN KENOSHA HERITAGE HOUSE LL LLC: $200,000 · OtherGORMAN KENOSHA HERITAGE HOUSE LL LLCTHE CHARMANT HOTEL LLC: $150,000 · OtherTHE CHARMANT HOTEL LLCENDF3DK LLC: $150,000 · OtherENDF3DK LLCCHERRY WATER LLC: $100,000 · OtherCHERRY WATER LLCINDIANHEAD COMMUNITY ACTION AGENCY INC: $89,150 · OtherINDIANHEAD COMMUNITY ACTION AGENCY INCOMNIA WOOD PRODUCTS LLC: $59,048 · Other+48 more: $882,640 · Other+48 moreTHE NORTHERN STAR THEATRE COMPANY: $28,952 · Arts & CultureGERALD L IGNACE INDIAN HEALTH CENTER I: $25,000 · HealthCROWN COURT PROPERTIES LTD: $10,000 · Housing & Shelter
Other$1,630,838Arts & Culture$28,952Health$25,000Housing & Shelter$10,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetINDIANHEAD COMMUNITY ACTION AGENCY INC: $89,150 over 1y, 2.9% of budgetTHE NORTHERN STAR THEATRE COMPANY: $28,952 over 1y, 18% of budgetGERALD L IGNACE INDIAN HEALTH CENTER I: $25,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetUNITED PIONEER HOME INC: $25,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetCROWN COURT PROPERTIES LTD: $10,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds INDIANHEAD COMMUNITY ACTION AGENCY INC ↗
  • Who funds THE NORTHERN STAR THEATRE COMPANY ↗
  • Who funds GERALD L IGNACE INDIAN HEALTH CENTER I ↗
  • Who funds UNITED PIONEER HOME INC ↗
  • Who funds CROWN COURT PROPERTIES LTD ↗

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Impact Seven Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Impact Seven Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%5%11%20%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 57 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2022, released 2022. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2024) is on record and reports no grant expense, so the figures above are from FY2022, the most recent year this funder made grants.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Impact Seven’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home