Skip to content

· Public charity

Imagine H2O Inc

Imagine h2o empowers people to deploy and develop innovation to solve water challenges globally.

$407k
Granted FY2024still arriving
13
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
States reached
$75k
Largest
01What it funds
0142% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Science & Tech$244kHealth$85kEnvironment$81kArts & Culture$32kSocial Science$15kHousing & Shelter$13kAnimals$9kOther$0
02FY2024 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k2 grants · $17k
  • $10k–50k9 grants · $253k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $132k
$22,251
Median grant
3
States reached
$3.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$75,000
Individual grant recipient$57,000
Individual grant recipient$45,600
Individual grant recipient$45,000
Individual grant recipient$38,827
Individual grant recipient$38,000
Individual grant recipient$22,251
Individual grant recipient$20,000
Individual grant recipient$18,800
Individual grant recipient$12,469
Individual grant recipient$12,000
Individual grant recipient$9,000
Individual grant recipient$8,000
02The need
03

Where the grant dollars land

Across the US and around the world.

US giving: 66% of grant dollars ($843k). The 34% that went abroad ($441k) is mapped below.

Which US states its grants reach

WI
MI
NY
MA
OR
IA
CA
CO
VA
AZ
KS
TX

Beyond the US: 34% of all-years giving ($441k)

5 countries, by the recipient’s country on the filing.

grant dollars sentlessmore
India$174k · 6 grants
Singapore$113k · 4 grants
Norway$75k · 1 grant
Australia$57k · 1 grant
United Kingdom$22k · 1 grant
How this is measured
International giving is mapped by the recipient’s country from the same 990 filings; comparable need data isn’t available at that grain.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

16%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$208k · 3 repeat orgs$1.1M to everyone else

3 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2024, 1 since wound down; 11 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

3
23

Total granted

$208k
$702k

Still filing today

0%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 7% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $375k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • GT
    Gross-Wen Technologies Inc
    2× · 2021–2022 · $113k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    2× · 2022–2024 · $71k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    2× · 2023–2024 · $24k

Funded once

  • AL
    Aclarity LLC
    one grant, 2022 · $103k
  • M
    Microlyze
    one grant, 2018 · $85k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2023 · $83k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field
04the grantee network

0 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2024, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 0 of the 37 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
0/0
Grantees still filing
0/0
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Gross-Wen Technologies Inc: $112,500 · OtherGross-Wen Technologies IncAclarity LLC: $102,500 · OtherAclarity LLCMicrolyze: $85,000 · OtherMicrolyzeIndividual grant recipient: $82,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient: $75,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient: $71,300 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient: $57,000 · OtherWist Inc: $56,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $52,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $45,600 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $45,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $43,000 · Other+25 more: $456,818 · Other+25 more
Other$1,284,718

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%grantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Imagine H2O Inc?

Find your warmest path to Imagine H2O Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 37 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Imagine H2O’s filings →

More from the funding graph