· Public charity
Imagine for Youth Foundation
Our mission is to help children achieve a healthy, active, and educated life.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2022–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 9 grants below total $295,000 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $406,485 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $111,485 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2025
- $10k–50k8 grants · $245k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| UI STEAD FAMILY CHILDRENS HOS | $50,000 |
| DIONS DREAMERS FOUNDATION | $35,000 |
| RAY DAVIS BTO CHARITABLE FND | $35,000 |
| FIRST OF MANY CHARITABLE | $35,000 |
| KEON COLEMAN FAMILY FOUNDATIO | $35,000 |
| CHASING MS FOUNDATION | $35,000 |
| ROUSSEAU FAMILY FOUNDATION | $35,000 |
| CHILDRENS HOSPITAL OF BUFFALO | $25,000 |
| A CHAMPIONS SHOES | $10,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY24–25, $90k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +2% since the first grant, against -19% for the ones you funded once.
4 repeat relationships — 4 still active in FY2025, 0 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 50% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $130k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- TCTHE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF BUFFALO FOUNDATION4× · 2022–2025 · $150k · revenue +98%
- ECEDWARD CHARLES FOUNDATION2× · 2024–2025 · $45k · revenue +2%
- CMChasing Ms Foundation Inc2× · 2024–2025 · $45k · revenue 0%
Funded once
- DFDREAMCATCHER FOUNDATION INCone grant, 2024 · $20k · revenue +3%
- KUKING URBAN LIFE CENTER INCone grant, 2023 · $20k · revenue -19%
- JPJORDAN POYER FOUNDATION INCone grant, 2024 · $10k · revenue -100% · 65% of their budget
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Edward Charles Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Keon Coleman Family Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 13 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds THE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF BUFFALO FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY FOUNDATION FOR GREATER BUFFALO INC ↗
- Who funds EDWARD CHARLES FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Chasing Ms Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds ROUSSEAU FAMILY FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds RAY DAVIS BTO CHARITABLE FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds KEON COLEMAN FAMILY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN ENDOWMENT FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds DREAMCATCHER FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds KING URBAN LIFE CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds A Champions Shoes ↗
- Who funds JORDAN POYER FOUNDATION INC ↗
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Imagine for Youth Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Imagine for Youth Foundation?
Find your warmest path to Imagine for Youth Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.