· Private foundation
Igcf Inc
Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What it funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2024.
Where the money goes
Grants by size, and the largest recipients.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k18 grants · $21k
- $10k–50k3 grants · $64k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Individual grant recipient | $34,854 |
| CONG YESHUOS MOSHE VIZNITZ | $15,400 |
| CHARIDY INC | $13,517 |
| Individual grant recipient | $5,000 |
| Moisdes Yetev Lev Bnei Brak Inc | $4,500 |
| CONGREGATION YETEV LEV OF MONSEY | $3,000 |
| Congregation-Avodas Yisroel Inc | $2,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $1,300 |
| Talmud Torah Darkei Avos | $1,260 |
| Congregation Oholei Yisochor | $750 |
| Individual grant recipient | $500 |
| Individual grant recipient | $500 |
| AHAVAS TORAH CONGREGATION | $380 |
| V'Yazreim | $360 |
| A TIME | $360 |
Does the money reach high-need areas?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.
Its human-services grants (FY19–24, $8k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
How this is measured
How this is measured
Who it funds again
Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.
Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +53% since the first grant, against +10% for those funded once.
66 repeat relationships: 13 still active in FY2024, 53 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 84% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $14k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
How this is measured
Backed again, and grew
- YOYESHIVAS OHR V'DAAS5× · 2019–2023 · $23k · revenue +13%
- YTYESHIVA TALPIOT INC3× · 2019–2021 · $12k · revenue +58%
- KEKUPATH EZRAH OF ROCKLAND COUNTY INC4× · 2019–2022 · $7k · revenue +81%
Funded once
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2020 · $50k
- ALAYZER LALIYA INCone grant, 2022 · $40k · revenue +10%
- CBCongregation Bas Shifra Miriam Of Mone grant, 2022 · $25k
How this is measured
Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
Closest unfunded matches
The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Provide financial assistance to needy individuals, and to religious, educational, and charitable organizations in us and abroad.
Organization raises funds which are disbursed to religious schools of higher education and talmudic research
To further religious jewish education for children and young adults in israel both directly, by using advanced education methods, and indirectly, by supporting the development of future teachers by subsidizing their education and training.…
To make grants to religious and charitable organizations.
To operate a religious school for high school and post high school students.
Religious Teaching
Maintain communal and charitable affairs in accordance with the tradition of the orthodox jewish faith
The furtherance of primacy of orthodox jewish jurisprudence
How this is measured
32 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.
How this is measured
Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 32 of the 197 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.
Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee
Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding
A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
Co-funders
Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Ojc Fund · The Lexicon Foundation Inc · Greenzweig Family Foundation · Mkz Charity Foundation Inc · Hf Foundation · Mk Charity Foundation Inc · Jack Adjmi Family Foundation Inc · Vyazreim Inc · Zichron Simcha Dsassov · S&E Foundation · Chayim V Chesed · American Friends of Bnai Levy Foundation
How this is measured
How much its grantees rely on government
Each dot is one organization Igcf Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Igcf Inc. Bigger dots raise more.
- Yeshiva Shagas Aryeh Inc: 9% of income from government
How this is measured
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Igcf Inc?
Find your warmest path to Igcf Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.
Play a game based on Igcf’s filings →