Skip to content
Idsa Education and Research Foundation at a glanceMostly funded, not a grantmaker: see who funds it →

· Public charity

Idsa Education and Research Foundation

The idsa foundation, the 501(c)(3) charitable arm of the infectious diseases society of america, complements idsa's mission by securing philanthropic and industry support to advance its strategic priorities.

$412k
Granted FY2024still arriving
1
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$120k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2024.

Health$4.0MScience & Tech$110kEducation$8kCommunity Improvement$5k
02FY2024 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 1 grants below total $120,436, the rows itemized in this filing. The $412,156 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $291,720 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.
$120,436
Median grant
1
States reached
$952k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
JAMAICA HOSPITAL MEDICAL CENTER$120,436
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY18–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 70% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION FOR A NEW AMERICAN UNIVERSITY: $100k → 11%BAK & MERMEL LLC: $10k → 11%BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL: $100k → 16%IDAHO STATE UNIVERSITY: $100k → 13%LEHIGH UNIVERSITY: $100k → 11%UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH: $8k → 11%THOMAS JEFFERSON UNIVERSITY: $90k → 22%UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA IRVINE: $250k → 10%KECK SCHOOL OF MEDICINE: $250k → 14%JAMAICA HOSPITAL MEDICAL CENTER: $120k → 13%UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS SW MEDICAL CENTER: $97k → 14%UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HEALTH SCIENCE CTR: $100k → 16%MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF S CAROLINA: $30k → 12%UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA: $50k → 19%WAYNE STATE UNIVERSITY: $40k → 21%WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE: $100k → 11%DUKE UNIVERSITY: $200k → 11%WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES: $100k → 15%EMORY UNIVERSITY: $87k → 14%DENVER HEALTH AND HOSPITAL: $10k → 12%OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY: $100k → 15%CINCINNATI CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL: $100k → 16%CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY: $100k → 17%UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON: $250k → 9%NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY: $100k → 14%UNIVERSITY OF NEVADA: $100k → 10%JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY: $100k → 19%BRIGHAM & WOMENS HOSP PIH: $30k → 16%TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA: $100k → 22%AXONPARK INC: $5k → 14%UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS SW MEDICAL CENTER: $81k → 14%WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY: $250k → 15%EMORY UNIVERSITY: $92k → 14%CHILDRENS HOSPITAL OF CHICAGO: $8k → 14%THOMAS JEFFERCON UNIVERISTY: $89k → 22%EMORY UNIVERSITY: $88k → 14%UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA: $98k → 22%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
ID
IL
MI
NY
MA
NV
OH
PA
NJ
CA
CO
MO
MD
AZ
NC
SC
AL
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

14%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$509k · 3 repeat orgs$3.1M to everyone else

3 repeat relationships: 0 still active in FY2024, 3 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

3
31

Total granted

$509k
$3.0M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+17%
+36%

Still filing today

67%
42%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 0% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $120k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationHealthRecreation & SportsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • EU
    Emory University
    2× · 2022–2023 · $180k · revenue +15%
  • PU
    PHILADELPHIA UNIVERSITY
    2× · 2019–2021 · $179k · revenue +17%
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA
    2× · 2020–2023 · $150k

Funded once

  • WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY
    one grant, 2023 · $250k · revenue +23%
  • RT
    RUTGERS THE STATE UNIVERSITY
    one grant, 2023 · $250k
  • RO
    REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT IRVINE
    one grant, 2023 · $250k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Thomas Jefferson University

Thomas jefferson university ("tju") is a comprehensive university with preeminence in transdisciplinary, experiential professional education, research and discovery, delivering exceptional value for the 21st century students with…

Education
2
University of Miami

See Form 990, Part I, Line 1, Description of Organization Mission.

Education
3
Drexel University

Drexel university fulfills its founder's vision of preparing each new generation of students for productive professional and civic lives while also focusing its collective expertise on solving society's greatest problems. drexel is an…

Education
4
New York University

Nyu is a private university with approximately 60,000 matriculating students in 20 schools and institutes. nyu's primary missions are education, research and scholarship, and patient care.

Education
5
Rush University Medical Center

The mission of Rush is to improve the health of the individuals and diverse communities we serve through the integration of outstanding patient care, education, research and community partnerships.

Health
6
University of Minnesota Physicians

University of minnesota physicians serves as the integrated group practice for the university of minnesota medical school full-time faculty to provide the highest quality healthcare to patients and their families.university of minnesota…

Health
7
Western New England University

Western new england university, a comprehensive private institution with a tradition of excellence in teaching and scholarship and a commitment to service, awards undergraduate, master's, and doctoral degrees in various departments from…

Education
8
William Marsh Rice University

As a leading research university with a distinctive commitment to undergraduate education, Rice University aspires to path breaking research, unsurpassed teaching, and contributions to the betterment of our world. It seeks to fulfill this…

Education
9
Southern California University of Health Sciences

The mission of southern california university of health sciences (scu) is to educate students as competent, caring and successful practitioners of integrative healthcare. the university is committed to providing excellence in academics,…

Education
10
Truman Medical Center Incorporated

University health is an academic health center providing accessible, state-of-the-art quality healthcare to our community regardless of the ability to pay.

Health
11
A T Still University of Health Sciences

A.T. Still University of Health Sciences serves as a learning-centered university dedicated to preparing highly competent professionals through innovative academic programs. The University is committed to continuing its osteopathic…

Education
12
Mass General Brigham Incorporated & Affiliates Group Return

Mass general brigham incorporated is developing an integrated health care delivery system throughout the region that offers patients a continuum of coordinated, high-quality care.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Johns Hopkins University; the most unlike its peers is Wayne State University School of Medicine Student Senate. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

18 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 18 of the 37 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
18/18
Grantees still filing
17/18
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

RUTGERS THE STATE UNIVERSITY: $250,000 · OtherRUTGERS THE STATE UNIVERSITYREGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT IRVINE: $250,000 · OtherREGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT IRVINEUNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON: $250,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTONUNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA: $150,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF FLORIDATHE OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY: $100,000 · OtherTHE OHIO STATE UNIVERSITYBOARD OF REGENTS NEVADA SYSTEM OF HIGHER EDUCATION: $100,000 · OtherBOARD OF REGENTS NEVADA SYSTEM OF HIGHER EDUCATIONUNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HEALTH SCIENCE CENTER HOUSTON: $100,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HEALTH SCIENCE CENTER HOUSTONMASS GENERAL BRIGHAM INCORPORATED: $100,000 · OtherMASS GENERAL BRIGHAM INCORPORATEDIDAHO STATE UNIVERSITY: $100,000 · OtherIDAHO STATE UNIVERSITYTHE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTE: $97,100 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO: $94,077 · OtherEMORY UNIVERSITY: $86,700 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF TEXAS SW MEDICAL CENTER: $81,344 · Other+6 more: $97,000 · OtherWAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY: $250,000 · EducationWAKE FOREST UNIVERSITYUNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA: $250,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIATRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA: $198,400 · EducationTRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIAEmory University: $180,091 · EducationEmory UniversityPHILADELPHIA UNIVERSITY: $179,185 · EducationPHILADELPHIA UNIVERSITYJOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY: $100,000 · EducationJOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITYLEHIGH UNIVERSITY: $100,000 · EducationLEHIGH UNIVERSITYARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION FOR A NEW AMERICAN UNIVERSITY: $100,000 · EducationARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION FOR A NEW A…WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY: $100,000 · EducationWASHINGTON UNIVERSITYCASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY: $100,000 · EducationCASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITYWAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES: $100,000 · EducationWAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES+2 more: $48,000 · EducationDUKE UNIVERSITY HEALTH SYSTEM INC: $200,000 · HealthDUKE UNIVER…JAMAICA HOSPITAL MEDICAL CENTER: $120,436 · HealthJAMAICA HOS…CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL MEDICAL CENTER: $100,000 · HealthCHILDREN'S …+1 more: $8,000 · HealthNorthwestern University: $100,000 · Recreation & Sports
Other$1,856,221Education$1,705,676Health$428,436Recreation & Sports$100,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%grantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetWAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY: $250,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA: $250,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDUKE UNIVERSITY HEALTH SYSTEM INC: $200,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA: $198,400 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetEmory University: $180,091 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPHILADELPHIA UNIVERSITY: $179,185 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetJAMAICA HOSPITAL MEDICAL CENTER: $120,436 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY: $100,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNorthwestern University: $100,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLEHIGH UNIVERSITY: $100,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHILDREN'S HOSPITAL MEDICAL CENTER: $100,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION FOR A NEW AMERICAN UNIVERSITY: $100,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWASHINGTON UNIVERSITY: $100,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY: $100,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES: $100,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAnn & Robert H Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago: $8,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH: $8,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

Fidelity Investments …
Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift FundMA3.5× affinity4 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Idsa Education and Research Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Idsa Education and Research Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →median 12%
  • Johns Hopkins University: 12% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 37 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Idsa Education and Research’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home