Skip to content
Idaho Heritage Trust Incorporated at a glance

· Public charity

Idaho Heritage Trust Incorporated

To protect and interpret a legacy of important historical and cultural resources in the state of idaho for present and future generations.

$229k
Granted FY2025still arriving
17
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$15k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Arts & Culture$1.8MEducation$331kReligion$64kEnvironment$15kHousing & Shelter$10kFood & Nutrition$10k
02FY2025 · 17 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 17 grants below total $223,467, the rows itemized in this filing. The $228,534 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $5,067 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k2 grants · $18k
  • $10k–50k15 grants · $205k
$15,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$22M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
TUTTLE HOUSE$15,000
BELLEVUE HISTORICAL MUSEUM$15,000
HOMER POUND HOUSE$15,000
WORD OF LIFE CHURCH$15,000
Individual grant recipient$15,000
CANYON CREEK STAGE STATION$15,000
Individual grant recipient$15,000
Individual grant recipient$15,000
TWIN FALLS HIST PRESERV COMMISSION$15,000
ELKS LODGE 331$15,000
STALPHONSUS FOUNDATION INC$13,000
BIRCH CREEK CHARCOAL KILNS$12,000
ST LUKES EPISCOPAL CHURCH$10,000
ROMANCE THEATER$10,000
RB DAVIS DRUG STORE$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 50% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 11%HOMER POUND HOUSE: $15k → 7%TUTTLE HOUSE: $15k → 8%CANYON CREEK STAGE STATION: $15k → 11%THE LIBERTY THEATER: $50k → 11%REN BARON HANGAR ID FALLS AIRPORT: $15k → 11%SHOSHONE SHOWHOUSE: $100k → 11%TWIN FALLS HIST PRESERV COMMISSION: $15k → 11%BURLEY THEATER: $100k → 12%NUART THEATER: $49k → 12%BISMARK RNGR STN-PRIEST LAKE MUSEUM: $15k → 12%FIRST INDIAN PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH: $20k → 13%STANLEY MUSEUM(VALLEY CRK RNGR STN): $15k → 13%W KITCHEN PAVILLION SHOSHONE PARK: $15k → 13%KENWORTHY THEATER: $100k → 16%THE ROXY THEATER: $72k → 8%THE CABIN LITERARY CENTER: $15k → 8%WORD OF LIFE CHURCH: $15k → 11%HOWELL'S OPERA HOUSE OAKLEY: $15k → 12%PANIDA THEATER: $100k → 12%NEZ PERCE-CLEARWATER NAT'L FORESTS: $15k → 13%SHOSHONE LODGE NO 25: $15k → 13%MCCONNELL MANSION: $15k → 16%BELLEVUE HISTORICAL MUSEUM: $15k → 7%GORBY OPERA THEATER: $100k → 11%HOWELLS OPERA HOUSE: $15k → 12%ODEN BUSY BEES: $15k → 12%WALLACE ELKS LODGE 331: $15k → 13%MCCONNELL MANSION: $15k → 16%PANIDA THEATER: $15k → 12%ELKS LODGE 331: $15k → 13%TECH ASSIST-HIST ARCHITECT: $47k → 8%LELAND PIONEER COMMUNITY CHURCH: $15k → 16%TECH ASSIST-HIST ARCHITECT: $43k → 8%BOVILL THEATER: $50k → 16%TECH ASSIST-HIST ARCHITECT: $39k → 8%AVERY CITIZENS COMMUNITY: $15k → 13%TECH ASSIST-HIST ARCHITECT: $34k → 8%TECH ASSIST-HIST ARCHITECT: $31k → 8%TECH ASSIST-HIST ARCHITECT: $28k → 8%TECH ASSIST-HIST ARCHITECT: $28k → 8%TECH ASSIST-HIST ARCHITECT: $25k → 8%GRANTS & ALLOCATIONS: $78k → 8%GRANTS & ALLOCATIONS: $55k → 8%GRANTS & ALLOCATIONS: $54k → 8%GRANTS & ALLOCATIONS: $47k → 8%GRANTS & ALLOCATIONS: $35k → 8%GRANTS & ALLOCATIONS: $25k → 8%GRANTS & ALLOCATIONS: $25k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

35%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$861k · 10 repeat orgs$1.6M to everyone else

10 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2025, 8 since wound down; 15 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
89

Total granted

$861k
$1.4M

Still filing today

10%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 13% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $193k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureReligionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    7× · 2017–2023 · $317k
  • TA
    TECH ASSIST-HIST ARCHITECT
    8× · 2017–2024 · $275k
  • PT
    Panida Theater Committee Inc
    2× · 2022–2023 · $115k · revenue +120%

Funded once

  • GO
    GORBY OPERA THEATER
    one grant, 2023 · $100k
  • BT
    BURLEY THEATER
    one grant, 2023 · $100k
  • SS
    SHOSHONE SHOWHOUSE
    one grant, 2023 · $100k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field
04the grantee network

2 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 2 of the 114 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
1/2
Grantees still filing
1/2
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $317,296 · OtherIndividual grant recipientTECH ASSIST-HIST ARCHITECT: $275,016 · OtherTECH ASSIST-HIST ARCHITECTGORBY OPERA THEATER: $100,000 · OtherBURLEY THEATER: $100,000 · OtherSHOSHONE SHOWHOUSE: $100,000 · OtherKENWORTHY THEATER: $100,000 · Other+106 more: $1,371,208 · Other+106 morePanida Theater Committee Inc: $115,000 · Arts & CultureST ALPHONSUS FOUNDATION INC: $13,000 · Religion
Other$2,363,520Arts & Culture$115,000Religion$13,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%grantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetPanida Theater Committee Inc: $115,000 over 2y, 23% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Panida Theater Committee Inc ↗

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Idaho Heritage Trust Incorporated funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Idaho Heritage Trust Incorporated. Bigger dots raise more.

2025
’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%2%6%14%25%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY21–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Idaho Heritage Trust Incorporated?

    Find your warmest path to Idaho Heritage Trust Incorporated through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 114 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Idaho Heritage’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home