Skip to content
Hutton & Jost Memorial Trust at a glance

· Private foundation

Hutton & Jost Memorial Trust

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$671k
Granted FY2025still arriving
10
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$168k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0191% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2025.

Religion$2.2MEducation$403kHealth$403kInternational$403kPublic Benefit$403kYouth Development$347kScience & Tech$250kOther$0
02FY2025 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$55,888
Median grant
4
States reached
$12M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ARCHDIOCESE OF ST LOUIS$167,663
Individual grant recipient$55,888
JESUIT SEMINARY AID ASSOCIATION$55,888
SISTERS OF THE MOST PREC BLOOD$55,888
LITTLE SISTERS OF THE POOR$55,888
FATHERS OF PROVINCE OF SACRED HEART$55,888
CARDINAL GLENNON CHILDREN'S FDN$55,888
KVC MISSOURI$55,888
WHITE HOUSE RETREAT INC$55,888
CHRIST THE KING PRIORITY$55,888
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY18–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 89% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%CHRIST THE KING PRIORITY: $56k → 12%KVC MISSOURI: $56k → 5%SISTERS OF THE MOST PREC BLOOD: $56k → 5%DISCALCED CARMELITES: $56k → 11%GREAT CIRCLE FORM BOYS TOWN: $56k → 16%FRANCISCAN FATHERS OF PROVINCE: $56k → 21%LITTLE SISTERS OF THE POOR: $56k → 14%CHRIST THE KING PRIORITY: $56k → 12%SISTERS OF THE MOST PREC BLOOD: $56k → 5%DISCALCED CARMELITES: $56k → 11%GREAT CIRCLE FORM BOYS TOWN: $51k → 16%FRANCISCAN FATHERS OF PROVINCE: $51k → 21%LITTLE SISTERS OF THE POOR: $56k → 14%CHRIST THE KING PRIORITY: $51k → 12%SISTERS OF THE MOST PREC BLOOD: $51k → 5%DISCALCED CARMELITES: $51k → 11%GREAT CIRCLE FORM BOYS TOWN: $50k → 16%FRANCISCAN FATHERS OF PROVINCE: $50k → 21%LITTLE SISTERS OF THE POOR: $51k → 14%CHRIST THE KING PRIORITY: $50k → 12%SISTERS OF THE MOST PREC BLOOD: $50k → 5%DISCALCED CARMELITES: $50k → 11%GREAT CIRCLE FORM BOYS TOWN: $48k → 16%FRANCISCAN FATHERS OF PROVINCE: $48k → 21%LITTLE SISTERS OF THE POOR: $50k → 14%CHRIST THE KING PRIORITY: $48k → 12%JESUIT SEMINARY AID ASSOCIATION: $56k → 21%ARCHDIOCESE OF ST LOUIS: $168k → 11%CARDINAL GLENNON CHILDREN'S FDN: $56k → 21%St Louis Arch-Cardinal Rigali C: $150k → 11%JESUIT SEMINARY AID ASSOCIATION: $56k → 21%St Louis Arch-Cardinal Rigali C: $142k → 11%CARDINAL GLENNON CHILDREN'S FDN: $56k → 21%ST LOUIS ROMAN CATHOLIC: $56k → 11%JESUIT SEMINARY AID ASSOCIATION: $51k → 21%THE SOCIETY FOR THE PROPAGATION: $56k → 11%CARDINAL GLENNON CHILDREN'S FDN: $51k → 21%ST RAPHAEL THE ARCHANGEL: $56k → 11%JESUIT SEMINARY AID ASSOCIATION: $50k → 21%FATHERS OF PROVINCE OF SACRED HEART: $56k → 11%CARDINAL GLENNON CHILDREN'S FDN: $50k → 21%ST LOUIS ROMAN CATHOLIC: $51k → 11%THE SOCIETY FOR THE PROPAGATION: $51k → 11%ST RAPHAEL THE ARCHANGEL: $51k → 11%WHITE HOUSE RETREAT INC: $56k → 11%WHITE HOUSE RETREAT INC: $56k → 11%WHITE HOUSE RETREAT INC: $51k → 11%WHITE HOUSE RETREAT INC: $50k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$4.6M · 15 repeat orgs$279k to everyone else

15 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2025, 8 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

15
3

Total granted

$4.6M
$279k

Still filing today

7%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 58% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $279k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • LS
    LITTLE SISTERS OF THE POOR
    8× · 2018–2025 · $403k
  • WH
    WHITE HOUSE RETREAT
    8× · 2018–2025 · $403k
  • CG
    CARDINAL GLENNON CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION
    8× · 2018–2025 · $403k · revenue +362%

Funded once

  • AO
    ARCHDIOCESE OF ST LOUIS
    one grant, 2025 · $168k
  • FO
    FATHERS OF PROVINCE OF SACRED HEART
    one grant, 2025 · $56k
  • KM
    KVC MISSOURI
    one grant, 2025 · $56k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field
04the grantee network

1 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 1 of the 18 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
1/1
Grantees still filing
1/1
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

LITTLE SISTERS OF THE POOR: $402,881 · OtherLITTLE SISTERS OF THE POORWHITE HOUSE RETREAT: $402,881 · OtherWHITE HOUSE RETREATCARDINAL GLENNON CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION: $402,881 · OtherCARDINAL GLENNON CHILDREN'S FOUNDATIONJESUIT SEMINARY AID ASSOCIATION: $402,881 · OtherJESUIT SEMINARY AID ASSOCIATIONIndividual grant recipient: $402,881 · OtherIndividual grant recipientSISTERS OF THE MOST PREC BLOOD: $402,881 · OtherSISTERS OF THE MOST PREC BLOODFRANCISCAN FATHERS OF PROVINCE: $346,993 · OtherFRANCISCAN FATHERS OF PROVINCECHRIST THE KING PRIORITY: $308,490 · OtherCHRIST THE KING PRIORITYSt Louis Arch-Cardinal Rigali C: $292,246 · OtherSt Louis Arch-Cardinal Rigali CGREAT CIRCLE FORM BOYS TOWN: $252,602 · OtherST RAPHAEL THE ARCHANGEL: $249,578 · OtherST LOUIS ROMAN CATHOLIC: $249,578 · OtherTHE SOCIETY FOR THE PROPAGATION: $249,578 · OtherARCHDIOCESE OF ST LOUIS: $167,663 · Other+4 more: $300,558 · Other+4 more
Other$4,834,572

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%grantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCARDINAL GLENNON CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION: $402,881 over 8y, 0.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CARDINAL GLENNON CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION ↗

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Hutton & Jost Memorial Trust funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Hutton & Jost Memorial Trust. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–24
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 18 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Hutton & Jost Memorial’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home