Skip to content

· Private foundation

Hutto-Patterson Charitable

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$2.7M
Granted FY2025still arriving
10
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$799k
Largest
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Education$3.6MHealth$1.9MHuman Services$238kScience & Tech$6kOther$0
02FY2025 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
  • $50k–250k5 grants · $809k
  • $250k+4 grants · $1.9M
$210,718
Median grant
1
States reached
$10k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SLAMDANCE GROUP$799,080
YOUNG & HEALTHY$375,000
ABILITYFIRST$375,000
JOURNEY HOUSE INC$375,000
DOOR OF HOPE$210,718
HILLSIDES$171,004
FIVE ACRES$166,279
VILLA ESPERANZA SERVICES$133,535
RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE$127,840
SANTA MONICA THEATRE GUILD$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY25–25, $921k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%HILLSIDES: $171k → 14%JOURNEY HOUSE INC: $375k → 14%ABILITYFIRST: $375k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

63%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$5.0M · 14 repeat orgs$2.9M to everyone else

14 repeat relationships: 0 still active in FY2025, 14 since wound down; 10 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

14
5

Total granted

$5.0M
$151k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+16%
+23%

Still filing today

21%
20%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 0% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2.7M went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHuman ServicesHealthArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AC
    ART CENTER COLLEGE OF DESIGN
    6× · 2017–2023 · $300k · revenue +49%
  • TL
    THE LIBRARY FOUNDATION OF LOS ANGELES
    4× · 2017–2020 · $260k · revenue +16%
  • CI
    CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY
    2× · 2017–2018 · $6k · revenue +14%

Funded once

  • LF
    Library Foundation
    one grant, 2023 · $50k
  • HH
    HOPE HAVEN INC
    one grant, 2022 · $50k
  • UB
    UC BERKELEY - HEWLETT CHALLENGE
    one grant, 2017 · $30k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Southern California University of Health Sciences

The mission of southern california university of health sciences (scu) is to educate students as competent, caring and successful practitioners of integrative healthcare. the university is committed to providing excellence in academics,…

Education
2
Didi Hirsch Psychiatric Service

The roots of the los angeles didi hirsch psychiatric service dba didi hirsch mental health services ("dhmhs") extend back to the 1930s, when a group of women funded psychiatric care for people whose lives were devastated by the depression.…

Health
3
Union Station Homeless Services

We work to end homelessness through housing solutions, supportive services, and connection to community. we advocate for equitable and just systems that ensure all individuals and families will have a safe place they can call home.

Human Services
4
The Center in Hollywood

The center provides a place of community to end isolation, build relationships, and introduce housing, health and wellness services to adult individuals experiencing homelessness in hollywood. it contracts with public and non-profit grant…

Human Services
5
Alliance for Children's Rights

The alliance has improved the lives of more than 178,000 young clients with stability through adoption and legal guardianship, and with access to healthcare, education, and other critical supports, serving over 5,600 children and young…

Unclassified
6
Wellnest Emotional Health & Wellness

Through a holistic approach to emotional well-being, Wellnest offers hope, healing, and opportunity to the children, young adults, families, and communities we serve. Our commitment remains steadfast as we enter our second century of…

Human Services
7
Hathaway-Sycamores Child and Family Services

Sycamores nonprofit health organization whose mission is cultivating hope and resilience to enrich the well-being of children, families, and communities through out los angeles and riverside counties.

Human Services
8
California Institute of Contemporary Art
—
9
Edgewood Center for Children and Families

To be the place to begin for all bay area children, youth and families who need mental health, social services and academic support. edgewood is the premier provider of a full continuum of behavioral health services that transform the…

Health
10
Interval House

The mission of the organization is to ensure safety and stability for people who are battered, abused, homeless or at risk; to create public awareness about the epidemic of violence; and to mobilize the community to prevent violence and…

Human Services
11
Hamburger Home

Aviva believes every child and every family in our los angeles community deserves the chance for a brighter future. we provide compassionate support, therapeutic services and guidance to at-risk children and families.

Education
12
Pasadena Hospital Association Ltd

Huntington Health stands for community. We stand for compassion. But more than anything, Huntington stands for health. Providing world-class health care is our specialty, and it's what we've been doing for the San Gabriel Valley since…

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Young & Healthy; the most unlike its peers is Door of Hope. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 30 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/14
Grantees still filing
7/14
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $1,050,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientUC BERKELEY CONNECT PROGRAM: $700,000 · OtherUC BERKELEY CONNECT PROGRAMUOP SCHOOL OF DENTISTRY: $700,000 · OtherUOP SCHOOL OF DENTISTRYLawrence University: $500,000 · OtherLawrence UniversityUOP Physical Therapy School: $400,000 · OtherUOP Physical Therapy SchoolUSC OSTROW-SOCIAL WORK: $300,000 · OtherUSC OSTROW-SOCIAL WORKUC BERKELEY - BACKUP CHILDCARE: $262,500 · OtherDOOR OF HOPE: $210,718 · OtherUSCUNITED FRIENDS OF THE CHILDREN: $187,500 · Other+9 more: $717,035 · Other+9 moreUNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA: $750,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF SOUTH…ART CENTER COLLEGE OF DESIGN: $300,000 · EducationART CENTER COLLEGE …THE LIBRARY FOUNDATION OF LOS ANGELES: $260,000 · EducationTHE LIBRARY FOUNDAT…VILLA ESPERANZA SERVICES: $133,535 · EducationVILLA ESPERANZA SER…+1 more: $6,000 · EducationJOURNEY HOUSE INC: $375,000 · Human ServicesJOURNEY HOUS…ABILITYFIRST: $375,000 · Human ServicesABILITYFIRSTHILLSIDES: $171,004 · Human ServicesHILLSIDESSLAMDANCE GROUP: $799,080 · Arts & CultureSLAMDANCE …+1 more: $10,000 · Arts & CultureYOUNG & HEALTHY: $375,000 · HealthPIH Health Good Samaritan Hospital: $20,000 · Health
Other$5,027,753Education$1,449,535Human Services$921,004Arts & Culture$809,080Health$395,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSLAMDANCE GROUP: $799,080 over 1y, 69% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA: $750,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetYOUNG & HEALTHY: $375,000 over 1y, 14% of budgetART CENTER COLLEGE OF DESIGN: $300,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetTHE LIBRARY FOUNDATION OF LOS ANGELES: $260,000 over 4y, 1.3% of budgetHILLSIDES: $171,004 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetFive Acres The Boys and Girls' Aid Society of Los Angeles County: $166,279 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetVILLA ESPERANZA SERVICES: $133,535 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetPIH Health Good Samaritan Hospital: $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSANTA MONICA THEATRE GUILD: $10,000 over 1y, 2.6% of budgetCALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY: $6,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds SLAMDANCE GROUP ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA ↗
  • Who funds JOURNEY HOUSE INC ↗
  • Who funds YOUNG & HEALTHY ↗
  • Who funds ABILITYFIRST ↗
  • Who funds ART CENTER COLLEGE OF DESIGN ↗
  • Who funds THE LIBRARY FOUNDATION OF LOS ANGELES ↗
  • Who funds DOOR OF HOPE ↗
  • Who funds HILLSIDES ↗
  • Who funds Five Acres The Boys and Girls' Aid Society of Los Angeles County ↗
  • Who funds VILLA ESPERANZA SERVICES ↗
  • Who funds PIH Health Good Samaritan Hospital ↗
  • Who funds SANTA MONICA THEATRE GUILD ↗
  • Who funds CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY ↗

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Hutto-Patterson Charitable funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Hutto-Patterson Charitable. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Hutto-Patterson Charitable?

    Find your warmest path to Hutto-Patterson Charitable through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 30 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Hutto-Patterson’s filings →

    More from the funding graph