· Private foundation
Hutker Family Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2022–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k20 grants · $40k
- $10k–50k1 grant · $12k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| YMCA CAPE COD | $50,000 |
| UC FOUNDATION | $12,000 |
| FALMOUTH CHORALE | $7,500 |
| FALMOUTH ART CENTER | $5,000 |
| NATIONAL CMV FOUNDATION | $5,000 |
| CAPE COD MODERN HOUSE TRUST INC | $2,500 |
| FAMILY TABLE COLLABORATIVE | $2,000 |
| CHARLES RIVER WATERSHED ASSOCIATION | $2,000 |
| ALL HANDS AND HEARTS DEVELOPMENT | $2,000 |
| DEDHAM FOOD PANTRY | $1,500 |
| RIVERDALE PTO | $1,500 |
| WGBH | $1,200 |
| FRIENDS OF BOURNE COUNCIL ON AGING | $1,000 |
| ISLAND ELDERLY HOUSING | $1,000 |
| FALMOUTH ACADEMY | $1,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY22–25, $9k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 29% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
21 repeat relationships — 17 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 92% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $8k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- NCNATIONAL CMV FOUNDATION INC4× · 2022–2025 · $35k · revenue +24%
- TFTHE FALMOUTH CHORALE INC4× · 2022–2025 · $24k · revenue +32%
- DFDedham Food Pantry Charitable Trust3× · 2023–2025 · $4k · revenue +52%
Funded once
- OIONTIC INITIATIVE LTDone grant, 2023 · $10k
BUZZARDS BAY COALITIONgraduatedone grant, 2023 · $5k · revenue +105%- FSFALMOUTH SCHOLARSHIP ASSOCIATION INCgraduatedone grant, 2024 · $5k · revenue +30%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The mission of the falmouth historical society, through the museums on the green, is to provide educational programs, and to preserve, share and celebrate the history and culture of the cape cod town of falmouth.
To encourage and assist in the acquisition, preservation and management of open space on cape cod
To enhance the quality of life of our community by inspiring lifelong learning, providing free and open access to information, and fostering community connections.
Land conservation
The 300 committee's mission is to preserve land in falmouth massachusetts and to raise awareness of the value of open space to the community
To improve the health of our community through the provision of equitable, patient centered, high quality, compassionate care to all, regardless of ability to pay.
The franklin land trust works to conserve farms, forests, wildlands, and other natural resources significant to the quality of the environment, economy, and rural character of western massachusetts.
To own and lease land for the purpose of developing, building and maintaining affordable housing on martha's vineyard, massachusetts.
Mass farmers markets partners wtih farmers, consumers, and communities to improve the health of individuals, strenghten community vitality, and enhance local farm viability through farmers markets.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Heritage Museums and Gardens Inc and the most unlike its peers is Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
20 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2026, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 20 of the 34 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds NATIONAL CMV FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds THE FALMOUTH CHORALE INC ↗
- Who funds ONTIC INITIATIVE LTD ↗
- Who funds CAPE COD MODERN HOUSE TRUST ↗
- Who funds BUZZARDS BAY COALITION ↗
- Who funds FALMOUTH SCHOLARSHIP ASSOCIATION INC ↗
- Who funds Dedham Food Pantry Charitable Trust ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS OF BOURNE COUNCIL ON AGING ↗
- Who funds FALMOUTH SERVICE CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds Dedham Community Association Inc ↗
- Who funds ISLAND ELDERLY HOUSING INC ↗
- Who funds FALMOUTH ACADEMY INC ↗
- Who funds PINE STREET INN INC ↗
- Who funds CHARLES RIVER WATERSHED ASSOCIATION INC ↗
- Who funds HERITAGE MUSEUMS AND GARDENS INC ↗
- Who funds FAMILY TABLE COLLABORATIVE INC ↗
- Who funds HOUSING ASSISTANCE CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC ↗
- Who funds ANXIETY AND DEPRESSION ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA ↗
- Who funds Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Cape Cod Foundation Inc · Martha's Vineyard Bank Charitable Foundation Inc · Arbella Insurance Foundation · Eastern Bank Foundation · Boston Foundation Inc · Cape Cod Five Cents Savings Bank Charitable Foundation Trust · Mutual Bancorp Foundation Inc Fka Cape Cod 5 Foundation Inc · Cape & Coast Bank Foundation · Bilezikian Family Foundation Inc · Massachusetts Bankers Association Charitable Foundation Inc · Rockland Trust Charitable Foundation Inc · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Hutker Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Buzzards Bay Coalition — 37% of income from government
- Pine Street Inn Inc — 11% of income from government
- Housing Assistance Corporation — 10% of income from government
- Charles River Watershed Association Inc — 8% of income from government
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc — 7% of income from government
- The Falmouth Chorale Inc — 2% of income from government
- Family Table Collaborative Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.