Skip to content

· Private foundation

Hunter Family Charitable Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$123k
Granted FY2024still arriving
25
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
States reached
$25k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2024.

Religion$73kEducation$41kArts & Culture$29kAnimals$27kHealth$26kHuman Services$8kEnvironment$7kPhilanthropy$6kOther$0
02FY2024 · 25 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k22 grants · $66k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $58k
$3,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$2.7M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
TRINITY EPISCOPAL CHURCH$25,000
WINNIE BERRY HUMANE SOCIETY$17,500
SAINT CYPRIAN'S EPISCOPAL CHURCH$15,000
BOLIVAR POINT LIGHTHOUSE$5,000
MUSEUM OF EAST TEXAS$5,000
BUCKNER CHILDREN & FAMILY SERVICES$5,000
HOSPICE IN THE PINES$5,000
YAGA'S CHILDREN FUND$5,000
1894 INC$5,000
SMART FAMILY LITERACY$5,000
SAINT CYPRIAN'S EPISCOPAL SCHOOL$5,000
THE BRYAN MUSEUM$5,000
Individual grant recipient$3,000
THE MOSAIC CENTER$2,500
CRISTO REY JESUIT SCHOOL$2,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY23–24, $16k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 14%. 97% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 14%CASA OF GALVESTON COUNTY: $500 → 14%BUCKNER CHILDREN & FAMILY SERVICES: $5k → 16%HOSPICE IN THE PINES: $5k → 16%HOSPICE IN THE PINES: $3k → 16%THE MOSAIC CENTER: $3k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

77%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$168k · 20 repeat orgs$50k to everyone else

20 repeat relationships: 19 still active in FY2024, 1 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

20
6

Total granted

$168k
$17k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+13%
+126%

Still filing today

45%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 73% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $34k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesHealthPhilanthropyAnimalsEnvironmentEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SC
    ST CYPRIANS EPISCOPAL SCHOOL
    3× · 2022–2024 · $11k · revenue +20%
  • MO
    Museum of East Texas
    4× · 2018–2024 · $9k · revenue +64%
  • HI
    HOSPICE IN THE PINES INC
    2× · 2023–2024 · $8k · revenue +7%

Funded once

  • SC
    SAIN CYPRIAN'S EPISCOPAL CHURCH
    one grant, 2023 · $12k
  • SF
    STEPHEN F AUSTIN ST UNIV FOUND
    one grant, 2018 · $2k
  • SC
    SHRINER CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL
    one grant, 2018 · $1k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Hospice of East Texas

Hospice of east texas seeks to enhance the quality of life for individuals and families dealing with life-limiting illness and to assist bereaved family members by providing comprehensive, coordinated care and support.

—
2
Texas Children's Hospital

Texas children's hospital, headquartered in houston, texas, is a not-for-profit organization whose mission is to create a healthier future for children and women throughout our global community by leading in patient care, education and…

Health
3
Children's Hospital Association of Texas

To advance children's health and well-being by advocating for policies and funding that promote children's access to high-quality, comprehensive health care.

—
4
El Paso Children's Hospital Corporation

To provide compassionate, coordinated, family-centered care for children with a dedicated commitment to excellent patient outcomes, inclusive leadership and innovative pediatric research and education.

Health
5
Hospice of South Texas Inc

Hospice care of terminally ill patients

—
6
East Texas Community Clinic Inc

To provide comprehensive primary care and preventive care to all persons regardless of their ability to pay.

—
7
Childrens Museum of the Brazos Valley

The mission of the Children's Museum of the Brazos Valley is to provide a child-centered, hands-on, interactive environment for learning and discovery.

Arts & Culture
8
El Campo Memorial Hospital

The hospital provides el campo and surrounding areas with the highest standard of care through a broad range of services: inpatient, swing bed, emergency, surgical, laboratory, imaging, respiratory, etc.

Health
9
Vision Galveston

Vision Galveston's mission is to help turn Galveston into the best place to raise a family, uncover new opportunities, and grow the economy. Vision Galveston seeks to connect that vision with the resources needed for implementation.

Community Improvement
10
El Paso Center for Children Inc

El paso center for children, inc's purpose is to provide homes for dependent and neglected children and an array of support services for emotionally disturbed children, adolescents, and their families. the organization operates entirely in…

—
11
Texans Care for Children Inc

Texans Care for Children shapes public policies and brings Texans together to make children a statewide priority. We work so kids can have what they need to be healthy, secure, and thriving and so every Texan can have the best start to…

Crime & Legal
12
Childrens Advocacy Center of Van Zandt County Inc

The children's advocacy center of van zandt county is committed to ensuring quality services and support to those children impacted by abuse while also building a future where no child in van zandt county experiences abuse.

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Casa of Galveston County; the most unlike its peers is The Mosaic Center Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 32 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/14
Grantees still filing
8/14
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

TRINITY EPISCOPAL CHURCH: $45,000 · OtherTRINITY EPISCOPAL CHURCHWINNIE BERRY HUMANE SOCIETY: $21,685 · OtherWINNIE BERRY HUMANE SOCIETYIndividual grant recipient: $18,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientSAINT CYPRIAN'S EPISCOPAL CHURCH: $15,000 · OtherSAINT CYPRIAN'S EPISCOPAL CHURCHSAIN CYPRIAN'S EPISCOPAL CHURCH: $12,000 · OtherSAIN CYPRIAN'S EPISCOPAL CHURCHST CYPRIANS EPISCOPAL SCHOOL: $11,000 · OtherST CYPRIANS EPISCOPAL SCHOOL1894 INC: $10,000 · Other1894 INCTHE BRYAN MUSEUM: $10,000 · OtherTHE BRYAN MUSEUM+12 more: $29,250 · Other+12 moreHOSPICE IN THE PINES INC: $7,500 · Human ServicesBUCKNER CHILDREN & FAMILY SERVICES INC: $5,000 · Human ServicesTHE MOSAIC CENTER INC: $2,500 · Human Services+1 more: $500 · Human ServicesMuseum of East Texas: $8,500 · Arts & CultureST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $4,000 · HealthEast Texas Cancer Alliance of Hope: $1,600 · HealthSHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN: $1,000 · HealthYAGAS CHILDRENS FUND INC: $6,000 · PhilanthropySmart Family Literacy Inc: $5,000 · EducationFRIENDS OF THE ELLEN TROUT ZOO INC: $2,000 · AnimalsTHE ARTIST BOAT INC: $2,000 · Environment
Other$171,935Human Services$15,500Arts & Culture$8,500Health$6,600Philanthropy$6,000Education$5,000Animals$2,000Environment$2,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetST CYPRIANS EPISCOPAL SCHOOL: $11,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budget1894 INC: $10,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetMuseum of East Texas: $8,500 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetHOSPICE IN THE PINES INC: $7,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetYAGAS CHILDRENS FUND INC: $6,000 over 2y, 5.3% of budgetBUCKNER CHILDREN & FAMILY SERVICES INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSmart Family Literacy Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $4,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTHE MOSAIC CENTER INC: $2,500 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE ELLEN TROUT ZOO INC: $2,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTHE ARTIST BOAT INC: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetEast Texas Cancer Alliance of Hope: $1,600 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetSHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCASA OF GALVESTON COUNTY: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds ST CYPRIANS EPISCOPAL SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds 1894 INC ↗
  • Who funds Museum of East Texas ↗
  • Who funds HOSPICE IN THE PINES INC ↗
  • Who funds YAGAS CHILDRENS FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds BUCKNER CHILDREN & FAMILY SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds Smart Family Literacy Inc ↗
  • Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC ↗
  • Who funds THE MOSAIC CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF THE ELLEN TROUT ZOO INC ↗
  • Who funds THE ARTIST BOAT INC ↗
  • Who funds East Texas Cancer Alliance of Hope ↗
  • Who funds SHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN ↗
  • Who funds CASA OF GALVESTON COUNTY ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Bettye & Murphy George FoundationTX15.8× affinity5 shared granteesties to 9 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Bettye & Murphy George Foundation · Simon & Louise Henderson Foundation · Tll Temple Foundation · Harris & Eliza Kempner Fund Inc · The Moody Foundation · Mary K and Clifford Grum Foundation · Ernest L Kurth Jr Charitable Foundation · The Pineywoods Foundation · Dr Leon Bromberg Charitable Trust · Ippolito Charitable Foundation of Galveston · Shell USA Company Foundation · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Hunter Family Charitable Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Hunter Family Charitable Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Shriners Hospitals for Children: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 32 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Hunter Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph