Skip to content

· Public charity

Hundred Club of Wichita Falls

See schedule o.formed to provide benefits for the dependent, widows, and children of firemen and law enforcment officers of the city of wichita falls, wichita county, msu police department, and the district attorney's office investigators who have lost their lives in the line of duty, and to provide life-protecting equipment that cannot…

$219k
Granted FY2025still arriving
2
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$160k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2024.

Public Safety & Disaster$561k
02FY2025 · 2 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$160,400
Median grant
1
States reached
$537k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
WICHITA FALLS POLICE DEPARTMENT$160,400
CITY OF WICHITA FALLS$58,693
02Its field
03the grantee network

0 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2021–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2021 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 0 of the 4 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
0/0
Grantees still filing
0/0
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

WICHITA FALLS POLICE DPMT: $470,716 · OtherWICHITA FALLS POLICE DPMTWICHITA FALLS POLICE DEPARTMENT: $160,400 · OtherWICHITA FALLS POLICE DEPARTMENTWICHITA FALLS FIRE DEPARTMENT: $90,701 · OtherWICHITA FALLS FIRE DEPARTMENTCITY OF WICHITA FALLS: $58,693 · OtherCITY OF WICHITA FALLS
Other$780,510

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%grantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 4 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Hundred Club of Wichita Falls’ filings →

More from the funding graph