Skip to content
Foundation Dossiers

Missouri · Public charity

Humane Society of St Joseph & Buchanan County Missouri

The humane society of st. Joseph and buchanan county missouri, is a nonprofit organization dedicated to assisting the community in providing a better quality of life for animals through financial aid, education and advocacy. Our main objectives are to provide financial assistance for the companion animals of low-income guardians and to…

$381k
Granted FY2017
7
Itemized grants FY2017
7
Organizations funded FY2017
Read the full brief
Itemized, FY2017
$72k
The rest is grants the schedule does not break out
Median grant, FY2017
$10,000
Largest grant, FY2017
$15,000
States reached, FY2017
1

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2017 to FY2017, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
New Nodaway Humane Society$10,00014%

Plus 6 recipients with no EIN on record ($62k), not named here.

Compare Humane Society of St Joseph & Buchanan County Missouri with peer funders

About Humane Society of St Joseph & Buchanan County Missouri

How much does Humane Society of St Joseph & Buchanan County Missouri give?
Humane Society of St Joseph & Buchanan County Missouri reported 7 itemized grants totaling $72,095, out of $381,496 in total grant expense reported on the return in its FY2017 IRS filing.
What does Humane Society of St Joseph & Buchanan County Missouri fund?
By grant dollars over FY2017 to FY2017, its largest causes are Animals (51%), Youth Development (21%), Recreation & Sports (14%).
Who are Humane Society of St Joseph & Buchanan County Missouri's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2017 to FY2017: New Nodaway Humane Society ($10k).
Where is Humane Society of St Joseph & Buchanan County Missouri based?
Humane Society of St Joseph & Buchanan County Missouri is based in MO.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 7 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2017, released 2017. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Humane Society of St Joseph & Buchanan County Missouri’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home