Skip to content

· Private foundation

Huey Lin and Chihong John Ju Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$17k
Granted FY2024still arriving
7
Grants FY2024still arriving
4
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Education$23kArts & Culture$21kInternational$17kReligion$14kFood & Nutrition$7kHealth$4kHuman Services$1k
02FY2024 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k6 grants · $7k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
$1,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$979k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SAN FRANCISCO SYMPHONY$10,000
CHINESE MUSIC TEACHERS ASSOCIATION$2,000
NEW HOPE CHINESE CANCER CARE FOUNDA$1,000
FRIENDS OF FALUN GONG INC$1,000
UNICEF$1,000
MERCY SHIPS$1,000
DOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERS$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–22, $1k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $1k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
NY
NJ
CA
SC
DC
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

80%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$69k · 10 repeat orgs$17k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +46% since the first grant, against +7% for those funded once.

10 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2024, 3 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
8

Total granted

$69k
$17k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+46%
+7%

Still filing today

70%
38%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
InternationalArts & CultureEducationHuman ServicesFood & NutritionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • Feeding America
    2× · 2020–2022 · $7k · revenue +40%
  • Mercy Ships International
    5× · 2017–2024 · $6k · revenue +251%
  • UNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF
    5× · 2018–2024 · $6k · revenue +47%

Funded once

  • NT
    NATIONAL TAIWAN UNIVERSITY ACADEMIC
    one grant, 2023 · $10k
  • CL
    CALIFORNIA LINE DANCE ASSOCIATION OF AMERICAgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $2k · revenue +91%
  • WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC
    one grant, 2022 · $1k · revenue +7%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
United States Anti-Doping Agency

Preserve the integrity of competition, inspire true sport, protect the rights of u.s. athletes

Recreation & Sports
2
Federation of State Medical Boards of the United States Inc

The fsmb serves as the voice for state medical boards, supporting them through education, assessment, research and advocacy while providing services and initiatives that promote patient safety, quality health care and regulatory best…

Health
3
United States Olympic and Paralympic Committee

Empowering the competitive excellence and well-being of team usa athletes, championing the power of sport, and inspiring the nation.

Recreation & Sports
4
American Gas Association

American gas association's (the association) mission is to develop and advocate for informed, innovative, and durable policy that fulfills our nation's energy needs, environmental aspirations and economic potential. we are committed to…

—
5
Friends of the World Food Program Inc

To inspire and mobilize people in the united states to support the mission of the u.n. world food programme to end hunger.

Human Services
6
Usa Football Inc

Usa football's mission is to lead, strengthen and grow football for all. as the sport's governing body, usa football authors and delivers best-in-class resources and standards for every family member to pursue and enjoy america's favorite…

Recreation & Sports
7
UniversalGiving

Our mission is to connect people to quality giving and volunteer opportunities worldwide. universalgiving is a 501(c)3 nonprofit organization, whose vision is to create a world where giving and volunteering are a natural part of everyday…

Philanthropy
8
Usa for Unfpa Inc

Usa for unfpa promotes the health, dignity, and rights of women and girls around the world by supporting the life-saving work of unfpa, the united nations reproductive health and rights agency, through education, advocacy and fundraising.…

Human Services
9
United States Artists Inc

To invest in america's finest artists and illuminate the value of artists to society.

Arts & Culture
10
Foreign Policy for America

Foreign Policy For America is a nonpartisan advocacy organization founded to strengthen support for principled American engagement in the world.

—
11
Union for International Cancer Control

The Union for International Cancer Control (UICC) unites and supports the cancer community to reduce the global cancer burden, to promote greater equity, and to ensure that cancer control continues to be a priority in the world health and…

Health
12
Ucsf Foundation Investment Company

The organization provides professional investment management services for endowed gifts and financial assets entrusted to the ucsf foundation.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Medecins Sans Frontieres Usa Inc; the most unlike its peers is Feeding America. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 18 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
7/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

BUDDHIST TSU CHI FOUNDATION: $12,500 · OtherBUDDHIST TSU CHI FOUNDATIONNATIONAL TAIWAN UNIVERSITY ACADEMIC: $10,000 · OtherNATIONAL TAIWAN UNIVERSITY ACADEMICUNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA: $7,050 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINACHINESE MUSIC TEACHERS ASSOCIATION: $4,000 · OtherCHINESE MUSIC TEACHERS ASSOCIATION+4 more: $3,260 · Other+4 moreSAN FRANCISCO SYMPHONY: $15,149 · Arts & CultureSAN FRANCISCO SYMPHONYCALIFORNIA LINE DANCE ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA: $2,000 · Arts & CultureCALIFORNIA LINE DANCE …Mercy Ships International: $6,060 · InternationalMercy Ships Internati…UNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF: $5,591 · InternationalUNITED STATES FUND FO…MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $4,000 · InternationalMEDECINS SANS FRONTIE…United States Association for UNHCR: $1,000 · InternationalUnited States Associa…FRIENDS OF FALUN GONG INC: $4,500 · EducationFRIENDS OF…NEW HOPE CHINESE CANCER CARE FOUNDATION: $3,125 · EducationNEW HOPE C…Feeding America: $7,000 · Food & NutritionFeeding A…WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $1,000 · Human Services
Other$36,810Arts & Culture$17,149International$16,651Education$7,625Food & Nutrition$7,000Human Services$1,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSAN FRANCISCO SYMPHONY: $15,149 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFeeding America: $7,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMercy Ships International: $6,060 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF: $5,591 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF FALUN GONG INC: $4,500 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $4,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetNEW HOPE CHINESE CANCER CARE FOUNDATION: $3,125 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetCALIFORNIA LINE DANCE ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA: $2,000 over 1y, 2.6% of budgetWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUnited States Association for UNHCR: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds SAN FRANCISCO SYMPHONY ↗
  • Who funds Feeding America ↗
  • Who funds Mercy Ships International ↗
  • Who funds UNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF FALUN GONG INC ↗
  • Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
  • Who funds NEW HOPE CHINESE CANCER CARE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds CALIFORNIA LINE DANCE ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA ↗
  • Who funds WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds United States Association for UNHCR ↗

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Huey Lin and Chihong John Ju Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Huey Lin and Chihong John Ju Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Wounded Warrior Project Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 18 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Huey Lin and Chihong John Ju’s filings →

More from the funding graph