Skip to content

· Private foundation

HU and Eva Maud Bartlett Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$119k
Granted FY2025still arriving
8
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$41k
Largest
01What it funds
0190% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Arts & Culture$243kRecreation & Sports$214kCommunity Improvement$177kEmployment$79kYouth Development$50kPublic Safety & Disaster$50kEducation$40kMembership Benefit$30kOther$0
02FY2025 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k2 grants · $5k
  • $10k–50k6 grants · $114k
$14,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$2.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Sapulpa Historical Society Foundati$40,700
Sapulpa School Foundation$20,000
Macy's Cradle Inc$15,000
Sapulpa Area Chamber Fndn$14,000
Individual grant recipient$12,180
Sapulpa Athletics Boys Assocation$12,180
Central Tech Foundation$3,804
Keystone Crossroads Historical Soci$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 100% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 13%City of Sapulpa: $15k → 14%Keystone Crossroads Historical Soci: $1k → 15%Nancy Green Chapter NSDAR: $4k → 14%Keystone Crossroads Historical Soci: $1k → 15%Keystone Crossroads Historical Soci: $1k → 15%Keystone Crossroads Historical Soci: $1k → 15%Keystone Crossroads Historical Soci: $1k → 15%Keystone Crossroads Historical Soci: $1k → 15%Keystone Crossroads Historical Soci: $1k → 15%Keystone Crossroads Historical Soci: $1k → 15%Keystone Crossroads Historical Soci: $1k → 15%Sapulpa Area Chamber Fndn: $54k → 15%American Legion: $50k → 15%Sapulpa Kiwanis Youth Foundation: $50k → 15%Central Tech Foundation: $43k → 15%Sapulpa Area Chamber Fndn: $34k → 15%Sapulpa Area Chamber Fndn: $34k → 15%American Legion 36: $30k → 15%Central Tech Foundation: $27k → 15%Sapulpa School Foundation: $20k → 15%Sapulpa School Foundation: $20k → 15%Sapulpa Athletics Boys Assocation: $15k → 15%Sapulpa Area Chamber Fndn: $14k → 15%Sapulpa Area Chamber Fndn: $14k → 15%Sapulpa Girls Basketball: $12k → 15%Sapulpa Athletics Boys Assocation: $12k → 15%Sapulpa Athletics Assocation: $12k → 15%Sapulpa Area Chamber Fndn: $10k → 15%Sapula Main Street: $10k → 15%Sapulpa Girls Basketball: $9k → 15%First United Methodist Church: $7k → 15%Central Tech Foundation: $5k → 15%Sapulpa Area Chamber Fndn: $5k → 15%Sapulpa Area Chamber Fndn: $4k → 15%Sapulpa Area Chamber Fndn: $4k → 15%Sapulpa Area Chamber Fndn: $4k → 15%Central Tech Foundation: $4k → 15%Sapulpa Girls Basketball: $3k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

80%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$765k · 8 repeat orgs$193k to everyone else

8 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2025, 1 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
8

Total granted

$765k
$178k

Still filing today

25%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 87% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $15k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Community ImprovementHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SH
    Sapulpa Historical Society Foundati
    8× · 2017–2025 · $234k
  • SA
    SAPULPA AREA CHAMBER FOUNDATIO
    9× · 2017–2025 · $177k · revenue +168%
  • SP
    SAPULPA PARK FRIENDS FOUNDATION INC
    5× · 2017–2023 · $175k · revenue -55% · 29% of their budget

Funded once

  • AL
    American Legion
    one grant, 2020 · $50k
  • SK
    Sapulpa Kiwanis Youth Foundation
    one grant, 2018 · $50k
  • AL
    American Legion 36
    one grant, 2023 · $30k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field
04the grantee network

4 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 4 of the 17 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
3/4
Grantees still filing
2/4
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Sapulpa Historical Society Foundati: $233,907 · OtherSapulpa Historical Society FoundatiSAPULPA AREA CHAMBER FOUNDATIO: $177,000 · OtherSAPULPA AREA CHAMBER FOUNDATIOCENTRAL TECH FOUNDATION INC: $79,205 · OtherCENTRAL TECH FOUNDATION INCAmerican Legion: $50,000 · OtherAmerican LegionSapulpa Kiwanis Youth Foundation: $50,000 · OtherSapulpa Kiwanis Youth FoundationSapulpa School Foundation: $40,000 · OtherAmerican Legion 36: $30,000 · OtherSapulpa Athletics Boys Assocation: $27,180 · Other+7 more: $80,920 · Other+7 moreSAPULPA PARK FRIENDS FOUNDATION INC: $175,000 · Community ImprovementSAPULPA PARK FRIENDS…Macys Cradle Inc: $15,000 · Human Services
Other$768,212Community Improvement$175,000Human Services$15,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100kgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSAPULPA AREA CHAMBER FOUNDATIO: $177,000 over 9y, 13% of budgetSAPULPA PARK FRIENDS FOUNDATION INC: $175,000 over 5y, 29% of budgetCENTRAL TECH FOUNDATION INC: $79,205 over 4y, 40% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds SAPULPA AREA CHAMBER FOUNDATIO ↗
  • Who funds SAPULPA PARK FRIENDS FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds CENTRAL TECH FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds Macys Cradle Inc ↗

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization HU and Eva Maud Bartlett Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from HU and Eva Maud Bartlett Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    3get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to HU and Eva Maud Bartlett Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to HU and Eva Maud Bartlett Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 17 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on HU and Eva Maud Bartlett’s filings →

    More from the funding graph