Skip to content

· Public charity

Htc Trustee Catherine D Sharpe

Supporting organization of designated 501(c)(3) organizations.

$1.4M
Granted FY2025still arriving
11
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$234k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Arts & Culture$14MHealth$4.7MEducation$3.7MHuman Services$965kEnvironment$800kScience & Tech$364kYouth Development$201k
02FY2025 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k1 grant · $43k
  • $50k–250k10 grants · $1.3M
$138,825
Median grant
4
States reached
$30M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
PENN NEUROSURGICAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE$234,268
WHARTON SCHOOL OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA$208,238
PRINCETON UNIVERSITY$208,238
PENNSYLVANIA HOSPITAL$138,825
THE ACADEMY OF NATURAL SCIENCES$138,825
THE FRANKLIN INSTITUTE$138,825
THE SEEING EYE INC$69,413
THE SALVATION ARMY$69,413
DIVERSIFIED COMMUNITY SERVICES$69,413
BRYN MAWR HOSPITAL C0 MLH FINANCE$69,413
THE SHARPE-STRUMIA RESEARCH FOUNDATION$43,383
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $1.2M) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 15%. 50% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 15%GREATER PHILADELPHIA COMMUNITY ALLIANCE: $67k → 22%DIVERSIFIED COMMUNITY SERVICES: $69k → 21%THE SEEING EYE INC: $73k → 4%GREATER PHILADELPHIA COMMUNITY ALLIANCE: $65k → 22%THE SEEING EYE INC: $69k → 4%THE SEEING EYE INC: $67k → 4%THE SEEING EYE INC: $65k → 4%THE SEEING EYE INC: $63k → 4%THE SEEING EYE INC: $63k → 4%THE SEEING EYE INC: $63k → 4%THE SEEING EYE INC: $61k → 4%THE SEEING EYE INC: $58k → 4%DIVERSIFIED COMMUNITY SERVICES: $73k → 22%Diversified Community Services: $63k → 22%DIVERSIFIED COMMUNITY SERVICES: $63k → 22%DIVERSIFIED COMMUNITY SERVICES: $63k → 22%DIVERSIFIED COMMUNITY SERVICES: $61k → 22%Diversified Community Services: $58k → 22%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$23M · 9 repeat orgs$304k to everyone else

9 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2025, 1 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
2

Total granted

$23M
$304k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+41%
+500%

Still filing today

89%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 74% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $304k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthHuman ServicesArts & CultureEducationScience & TechOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TF
    THE FRANKLIN INSTITUTE
    9× · 2017–2025 · $14M · revenue +31% · 34% of their budget
  • PH
    PENNSYLVANIA HOSPITAL OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA HEALTH SYSTEM
    9× · 2017–2025 · $3.1M · revenue +41%
  • The Trustees of Princeton University
    9× · 2017–2025 · $1.7M · revenue +5%

Funded once

  • PN
    PHILADELPHIA NEUROLOGIC INSTITUTE FOUNDATION INCgraduated
    one grant, 2025 · $234k · revenue +109%
  • DC
    DIVERSIFIED COMMUNITY SERVICESgraduated
    one grant, 2025 · $69k · revenue +500%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Drexel University

Drexel university fulfills its founder's vision of preparing each new generation of students for productive professional and civic lives while also focusing its collective expertise on solving society's greatest problems. drexel is an…

Education
2
Philadelphia University

The organization is an affiliate within thomas jefferson university/jefferson health; a comprehensive professional university and tax-exempt integrated healthcare delivery system ("system"), with a tripartite mission of education, research…

Education
3
Thomas Jefferson University

Thomas jefferson university ("tju") is a comprehensive university with preeminence in transdisciplinary, experiential professional education, research and discovery, delivering exceptional value for the 21st century students with…

Education
4
New York University

Nyu is a private university with approximately 60,000 matriculating students in 20 schools and institutes. nyu's primary missions are education, research and scholarship, and patient care.

Education
5
The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia

The children's hospital of philadelphia, the oldest hospital in the united states dedicated exclusively to pediatrics, strives to be the world leader in the advancement of health care for children by integrating excellent patient care,…

Health
6
Institute for Advanced Study - Louis Bamberger & Mrs Felix Fuld Foundation

The institute for advanced study (the institute) is one of the world's leading centers for theoretical research and intellectual inquiry. see schedule o.

Science & Tech
7
Pinnacle Health Medical Services

Pinnacle health medical services is a charitable organization dedicated to maintaining and improving the health and quality of life for all the people of central pennsylvania by providing primary, clinic, family and specialty physician…

Health
8
Upmc Pinnacle Hospitals

Upmc pinnacle hospitals mission as a charitable organization is dedicatied to maintaining and improving the health and quality of life for all persons of the central pennsylvania area.

Health
9
Penn State Health

Penn state health's mission is to continually improve the health and well-being of the people of pennsylvania, and beyond. the organization provides patients with excellent, compassionate and equitable care; educates and trains (continued…

Health
10
Upmc Group

Healthcare, education, and research

—
11
Temple University Hospital Inc

See Schedule OOur mission is to support Temple University and its Health Sciences Center academic programs by providing the clinical environment and service to support the highest quality teaching and training programs for health care…

Health
12
Reading Hospital

Website: www.towerhealth.org/locations/reading-hospital the mission of reading hospital is to provide compassionate, accessible, high-quality, cost-effective healthcare to the community; to promote health; to education healthcare…

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Trustees of Princeton University; the most unlike its peers is Diversified Community Services. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 12 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
10/11
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

THE FRANKLIN INSTITUTE: $14,357,869 · Arts & CultureTHE FRANKLIN INSTITUTEPENNSYLVANIA HOSPITAL OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA HEALTH SYSTEM: $3,112,546 · HealthPENNSYLVANIA HOSPI…Main Line Hospitals Inc: $581,989 · HealthMain Line Hospital…PHILADELPHIA NEUROLOGIC INSTITUTE FOUNDATION INC: $234,268 · HealthPHILADELPHIA NEURO…The Sharpe - Strumia Research Foundation of the Bryn Mawr Hospital: $148,398 · HealthTRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA: $1,745,962 · EducationTRUSTEES OF THE…The Trustees of Princeton University: $1,745,962 · EducationThe Trustees of…THE SEEING EYE INC: $581,989 · Human ServicesGREATER PHILADELPHIA COMMUNITY ALLIANCE: $512,576 · Human ServicesDIVERSIFIED COMMUNITY SERVICES: $69,413 · Human ServicesTHE ACADEMY OF NATURAL SCIENCES OF PHILADELPHIA: $1,163,973 · Science & TechTHE SALVATION ARMY: $583,789 · Other
Arts & Culture$14,357,869Health$4,077,201Education$3,491,924Human Services$1,163,978Science & Tech$1,163,973Other$583,789

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE FRANKLIN INSTITUTE: $14,357,869 over 9y, 34% of budgetPENNSYLVANIA HOSPITAL OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA HEALTH SYSTEM: $3,112,546 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetTRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA: $1,745,962 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetThe Trustees of Princeton University: $1,745,962 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetTHE ACADEMY OF NATURAL SCIENCES OF PHILADELPHIA: $1,163,973 over 9y, 0.8% of budgetTHE SEEING EYE INC: $581,989 over 9y, 0.3% of budgetMain Line Hospitals Inc: $581,989 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetGREATER PHILADELPHIA COMMUNITY ALLIANCE: $512,576 over 8y, 1.3% of budgetThe Sharpe - Strumia Research Foundation of the Bryn Mawr Hospital: $148,398 over 4y, 4.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE FRANKLIN INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds PENNSYLVANIA HOSPITAL OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA HEALTH SYSTEM ↗
  • Who funds TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA ↗
  • Who funds The Trustees of Princeton University ↗
  • Who funds THE ACADEMY OF NATURAL SCIENCES OF PHILADELPHIA ↗
  • Who funds THE SEEING EYE INC ↗
  • Who funds Main Line Hospitals Inc ↗
  • Who funds GREATER PHILADELPHIA COMMUNITY ALLIANCE ↗
  • Who funds PHILADELPHIA NEUROLOGIC INSTITUTE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds The Sharpe - Strumia Research Foundation of the Bryn Mawr Hospital ↗
  • Who funds DIVERSIFIED COMMUNITY SERVICES ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Charities Aid Foundation AmericaVA10.5× affinity4 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Charities Aid Foundation America · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Htc Trustee Catherine D Sharpe funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Htc Trustee Catherine D Sharpe. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%3%10%23%40%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →median 11%
  • The Trustees of Princeton University: 11% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Htc Trustee Catherine D Sharpe?

Find your warmest path to Htc Trustee Catherine D Sharpe through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 12 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Htc Trustee Catherine D Sharpe’s filings →

More from the funding graph