Skip to content

· Private foundation

Howard and Stephanie Sherwood Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$212k
Granted FY2025still arriving
8
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$41k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Animals$766kYouth Development$347kCivil Rights$235kPhilanthropy$186kHealth$166kArts & Culture$123kHuman Services$91kEmployment$80kOther$0
02FY2025 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $5k
  • $10k–50k7 grants · $207k
$25,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$281k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ANTI DEMAMATION LEAGUE$41,297
JEWISH BIG BROTHERSSISTERS$40,500
MISCELLANEOUS CHARITIES$39,093
SANTA MONICA COLLEGE FNDTN$25,000
ONE VOICE$25,000
A PLACE CALLED HOME$20,690
JEWISH VOCATIONAL SERVICE$15,000
STEPHEN WISE FREE SYNAGOGUE$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $32k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%PATH: $3k → 14%ONE VOICE: $25k → 14%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $3k → 14%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $1k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.9M · 25 repeat orgs$108k to everyone else

25 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2025, 19 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

25
10

Total granted

$1.9M
$58k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+30%
+254%

Still filing today

36%
30%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 76% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $50k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesArts & CulturePhilanthropyInternationalYouth DevelopmentCivil RightsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AP
    A PLACE CALLED HOME
    7× · 2017–2025 · $258k · revenue +4%
  • AL
    ANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE
    7× · 2017–2025 · $230k · revenue +78%
  • TU
    The United States Holocaust Memorial Museum
    4× · 2017–2024 · $95k · revenue +25%

Funded once

  • WR
    WISE READERS TO LEADERS
    one grant, 2024 · $25k · revenue 0%
  • UH
    United Hatzalah of Israel
    one grant, 2022 · $10k
  • TE
    THE EMERIL LAGASSE FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $5k · revenue +254%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Los Angeles World Affairs Council and Town Hall

The organization is a non-partisan, membership based speakers' forum that connects business leaders, community members, and engaged individuals with shared interest in local, national, and global affairs. it provides an open and accessible…

International
2
Ucla Foundation

The ucla foundation is the giving, receiving, and investing arm of the ucla campus. the foundation enables private donors to help build, sustain and advance one of the world's finest academic and research institutions. private philanthropy…

Education
3
Jewish Federation Council of Greater La

Based on jewish values, the jewish federation of greater los angeles convenes and leads the community and leverages its resources to assure the continuity of the jewish people, support a secure state of israel, care for jews in need here…

Philanthropy
4
Actionaid Usa

Actionaid is an international network building a just, equitable, and sustainable world in solidarity with communities on the frontlines of poverty and injustice. actionaid usa is the u.s. branch of actionaid international, which works in…

Social Science
5
Jewish Community Foundation of Los Angeles

We steward $1.5 billion in charitable assets through donor-advised funds, endowments, and other giving vehicles. partnering with 1,400 individuals, families, and organizations, we build enduring legacies and multigenerational impact. in…

Philanthropy
6
Samuel Waxman Cancer Research Foundation

The samuel waxman cancer research foundation (the "foundation") funds innovative research to bring faster cures to patients. in addition to supporting ongoing collaborative research in specific cancers, our scientists are investigating the…

—
7
The Jewish Museum

The mission of the jewish museum is to collect, preserve, exhibit and interpret art and jewish culture. see schedule o for more information.

Arts & Culture
8
International Crisis Group

Crisis group works to prevent and resolve deadly conflict around the world by informing and influencing the perceptions and actions of policymakers and other key conflict actors. to this end, we endeavour to talk to all sides and provide…

International
9
America's Health Insurance Plans Inc

Ahip is the national trade association representing the health insurance industry. ahip's members provide health care coverage, services and solutions to more than 200 million americans. we are committed to market-based solutions and…

Membership Benefit
10
Health Care Without Harm

The mission of health care without harm (hcwh) is to transform health care worldwide so that it reduces its environmental footprint, becomes a community anchor for sustainability and a leader in the global movement for environmental health…

Environment
11
United States Telecom Association

See schedule oustelecom exists to ensure members can compete, grow and thrive to build a world where families, enterprises and communities are connected through the power of broadband.our member companies have committed a considerable…

—
12
Peter G Peterson Institute for International Economics

The peterson institute for international economics (piie) is an independent nonprofit, nonpartisan research organization dedicated to strengthening prosperity and human welfare in the global economy through expert analysis and practical…

Social Science
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is California Community Foundation; the most unlike its peers is The United States Holocaust Memorial Museum. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 38 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/14
Grantees still filing
10/14
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

MISCELLANEOUS CHARITIES: $461,715 · OtherMISCELLANEOUS CHARITIESA PLACE CALLED HOME: $258,121 · OtherA PLACE CALLED HOMEJEWISH FEDERATION OF LA: $149,000 · OtherJEWISH FEDERATION OF LACYSTIC FIBROSIS FOUNDATION: $135,650 · OtherCYSTIC FIBROSIS FOUNDATIONJEWISH FAMILY SERVICE LA: $93,180 · OtherJEWISH FAMILY SERVICE LAJEWISH BIG BROTHERSSISTERS: $82,020 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $80,000 · OtherJEWISH VOCATIONAL SERVICE: $80,000 · OtherJEWISH FAMILY SERVICE: $66,000 · Other+16 more: $195,075 · Other+16 moreANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE: $230,286 · Civil RightsANTI-DEFAMAT…The United States Holocaust Memorial Museum: $95,000 · Arts & CultureSIMON WIESENTHAL CENTER INC: $4,600 · Arts & CultureCALIFORNIA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $36,300 · PhilanthropyCONCERN FOUNDATION: $30,350 · PhilanthropyTHE EMERIL LAGASSE FOUNDATION: $5,000 · PhilanthropyOne Voice: $25,000 · Human ServicesAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $4,000 · Human ServicesPATH: $2,500 · Human ServicesWISE READERS TO LEADERS: $25,000 · Youth DevelopmentTHE PAINTED TURTLE: $2,000 · Youth DevelopmentHUMAN RIGHTS WATCH INC: $4,030 · InternationalUNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF: $1,519 · International
Other$1,600,761Civil Rights$230,286Arts & Culture$99,600Philanthropy$71,650Human Services$31,500Youth Development$27,000International$5,549

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetA PLACE CALLED HOME: $258,121 over 7y, 1.5% of budgetANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE: $230,286 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetThe United States Holocaust Memorial Museum: $95,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCALIFORNIA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $36,300 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCONCERN FOUNDATION: $30,350 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetWISE READERS TO LEADERS: $25,000 over 1y, 3.3% of budgetTHE EMERIL LAGASSE FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetSIMON WIESENTHAL CENTER INC: $4,600 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetHUMAN RIGHTS WATCH INC: $4,030 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $4,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPATH: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE PAINTED TURTLE: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF: $1,519 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds A PLACE CALLED HOME ↗
  • Who funds ANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE ↗
  • Who funds The United States Holocaust Memorial Museum ↗
  • Who funds CALIFORNIA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds CONCERN FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds WISE READERS TO LEADERS ↗
  • Who funds One Voice ↗
  • Who funds THE EMERIL LAGASSE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds SIMON WIESENTHAL CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds HUMAN RIGHTS WATCH INC ↗
  • Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗
  • Who funds PATH ↗
  • Who funds THE PAINTED TURTLE ↗
  • Who funds UNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift FundMA6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Howard and Stephanie Sherwood Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Howard and Stephanie Sherwood Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Howard and Stephanie Sherwood Family Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Howard and Stephanie Sherwood Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 38 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Howard and Stephanie Sherwood Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph