Skip to content
Foundation Dossiers

Texas · Private foundation

HousemanWilkins Ophthalmological Foundation

Its FY2021 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$74k
Granted FY2021
2
Grants FY2021
2
Organizations funded FY2021
50%
First-time grantees FY2021
Read the full brief
Median grant, FY2021
$50,000
Largest grant, FY2021
$50,000
Organizations funded a year
1 to 3
FY2017 to FY2021
States reached, FY2021
1
Applications
Preselected organizations only
Per its most recent filing; check its own site

How open it is to new grantees

In FY2021, 50% of the organizations HousemanWilkins Ophthalmological Foundation funded were first-time grantees, receiving 33% of its grant dollars.

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2021, 67% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $24k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21
PhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
The numbers by year
Fiscal yearOrganizations fundedTo those organizationsFirst-time grantees
FY20212$74k50%
FY20201$100k100%
FY20191$6380%
FY20182$50k100%
FY20173$36kn/a
100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2021.

Health$175kPhilanthropy$85k

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2017 to FY2021, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
Adopt-A-Scientist$85,000217%
Houston Eye Associates Foundation$15,63823%
Spring Branch Community Health Center$30010%
The Arvo Foundation for Eye Research Inc$25010%

Plus 3 recipients with no EIN on record ($159k), not named here.

Compare HousemanWilkins Ophthalmological Foundation with peer funders

About HousemanWilkins Ophthalmological Foundation

How much does HousemanWilkins Ophthalmological Foundation give?
HousemanWilkins Ophthalmological Foundation reported 2 grants totaling $74,101 in its FY2021 IRS filing. It funded between 1 and 3 organizations a year over FY2017 to FY2021.
What does HousemanWilkins Ophthalmological Foundation fund?
By grant dollars over FY2017 to FY2021, its largest causes are Health (67%), Philanthropy (33%).
Who are HousemanWilkins Ophthalmological Foundation's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2017 to FY2021: Adopt-A-Scientist ($85k), Houston Eye Associates Foundation ($16k), Spring Branch Community Health Center ($300).
Does HousemanWilkins Ophthalmological Foundation fund new organizations?
In FY2021, 50% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.
Does HousemanWilkins Ophthalmological Foundation accept unsolicited applications?
Its most recent filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and does not take unsolicited requests. Check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
Where is HousemanWilkins Ophthalmological Foundation based?
HousemanWilkins Ophthalmological Foundation is based in TX.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 7 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2021, released 2021. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on HousemanWilkins Ophthalmological’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home