Skip to content
Foundation DossiersAlso receives grants: funding profile →

South Carolina · Public charity

Horse Creek Trust

To plan and enact redevelopment for the revitalization of the graniteville, sc community.

$100k
Granted FY2020
1
Grants FY2020
1
Organizations funded FY2020
Read the full brief
Median grant, FY2020
$100,000
Largest grant, FY2020
$100,000
States reached, FY2020
1
Total assets, FY2020
$11M

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2020 to FY2020, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
Eden Peopleplanet$100,00011%

Compare Horse Creek Trust with peer funders

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Horse Creek Trust?

Find your warmest path to Horse Creek Trust through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

About Horse Creek Trust

How much does Horse Creek Trust give?
Horse Creek Trust reported 1 grants totaling $100,000 in its FY2020 IRS filing.
What does Horse Creek Trust fund?
By grant dollars over FY2020 to FY2020, its largest causes are International (100%).
Who are Horse Creek Trust's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2020 to FY2020: Eden Peopleplanet ($100k).
Where is Horse Creek Trust based?
Horse Creek Trust is based in SC.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 1 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2020, released 2020. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2024) is on record and reports no grant expense, so the figures above are from FY2020, the most recent year this funder made grants.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Horse Creek’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home