Skip to content

· Private foundation

Hopkin Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$206k
Granted FY2025still arriving
20
Grants FY2025still arriving
7
States reached
$102k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Education$1.8MArts & Culture$100kCrime & Legal$2kCivil Rights$350
02FY2025 · 20 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k15 grants · $42k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $61k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $102k
$3,712
Median grant
7
States reached
$383k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BRIGHAM YOUNG UNIVERSITY-IDAHO$101,900
RIVER UNIVERSITY$16,844
BRIGHAM YOUNG UNIVERSITY$16,028
COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY$15,000
ENSIGN COLLEGE$13,541
SNOW COLLEGE$8,277
Individual grant recipient$6,159
BOSTON UNIVERSITY$6,000
Individual grant recipient$4,782
Individual grant recipient$3,712
DAYSTAR UNIVERSITY$2,515
Individual grant recipient$2,422
Individual grant recipient$1,842
Individual grant recipient$1,402
Individual grant recipient$1,300
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY22–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 81% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%MARICOPA COMMUNITY COLLEGE: $39k → 11%JAMES MCQUIVEY: $2k → 7%BELMONT ACADEMIC PREP: $1k → 8%SALEM STATE UNIVERSITY: $5k → 10%SOUTHEASTERN TECHNICAL INSTITUTE: $3k → 11%U-MASS BOSTON: $18k → 16%BRIGHAM YOUNG UNIVERSITY-IDAHO: $194k → 22%DAYSTAR UNIVERSITY: $3k → 11%AMERICAN FILM INSTITUTE: $33k → 14%GANTRY FOUNDATION CO THE GANTRY GRO: $106k → 13%COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY: $15k → 17%BROWN UNIVERSITY: $64k → 14%UNIVERSITY OF UTAH: $10k → 8%BRIGHAM YOUNG UNIVERSITY: $39k → 8%CELINA SAEZ: $5k → 12%SNOW COLLEGE: $8k → 15%FRANCISCAN UNIVERSITY: $5k → 19%SHORELINE COMMUNITY COLLEGE: $5k → 9%RIVER UNIVERSITY: $17k → 7%FRANKLIN PIERCE UNIVERSTIY: $3k → 9%ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY: $1k → 11%LABOURE COLLEGE: $12k → 7%SHELLEY KNICKERBOCKER: $793 → 8%BOSTON UNIVERSITY: $6k → 16%BRIGHAM YOUNG UNIVERSITY-IDAHO: $162k → 22%DAYSTAR UNIVERSITY: $2k → 11%BROWN UNIVERSITY: $63k → 14%SALT LAKE COMMUNITY COLLEGE: $6k → 8%BRIGHAM YOUNG UNIVERSITY: $24k → 8%SNOW COLLEGE: $5k → 15%BOSTON UNIVERSITY: $6k → 16%BRIGHAM YOUNG UNIVERSITY-IDAHO: $149k → 22%DAYSTAR UNIVERSITY: $1k → 11%SALT LAKE COMMUNITY COLLEGE: $3k → 8%BRIGHAM YOUNG UNIVERSITY: $18k → 8%BRIGHAM YOUNG UNIVERSITY-IDAHO: $102k → 22%ENSIGN COLLEGE: $20k → 8%BRIGHAM YOUNG UNIVERSITY: $16k → 8%LDS BUSINESS COLLEGE: $15k → 8%IDAI COTACHE: $2k → 8%ENSIGN COLLEGE: $14k → 8%THOBILE NKOE: $1k → 8%ENSIGN COLLEGE: $6k → 8%MOTLATSI NKOE: $600 → 8%ENSIGN COLLEGE: $3k → 8%UTAH VALLEY UNIVERSITY: $10k → 8%PHILLIP ODIAMBO: $1k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NH
WA
ID
MN
NY
MA
SD
OH
NJ
RI
CA
UT
MD
AZ
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 19% of Hopkin Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

Hopkin Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 7.8% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

84%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.5M · 26 repeat orgs$275k to everyone else

26 repeat relationships: 12 still active in FY2025, 14 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

26
28

Total granted

$1.5M
$248k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-1%
+47%

Still filing today

12%
11%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 86% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $27k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BY
    BRIGHAM YOUNG UNIVERSITY-IDAHO
    6× · 2020–2025 · $880k
  • BY
    BRIGHAM YOUNG UNIVERSITY
    6× · 2020–2025 · $188k
  • EC
    ENSIGN COLLEGE
    6× · 2020–2025 · $95k

Funded once

  • GF
    GANTRY FOUNDATION CO THE GANTRY GRO
    one grant, 2022 · $106k
  • MC
    MARICOPA COMMUNITY COLLEGE
    one grant, 2022 · $39k
  • UB
    U-MASS BOSTON
    one grant, 2022 · $18k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

—
2
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
3
Roger Williams University

At Roger Williams University, students are prepared to be thinkers and doers ready to solve challenging problems with innovative solutions. RWU offers robust offerings of undergraduate, graduate and professional programs across eight…

Education
4
Franklin University

Since 1902, Franklin University has been a pioneer in meeting the needs of adult students who have the ambition to continue their education in combination with other responsibilities, receiving its status as a tax exempt organization in…

—
5
Western New England University

Western new england university, a comprehensive private institution with a tradition of excellence in teaching and scholarship and a commitment to service, awards undergraduate, master's, and doctoral degrees in various departments from…

Education
6
Regis College

Regis college, through education in the arts, sciences, and professions empowers women and men to challenge themselves academically, to serve and to lead. a catholic college, regis is a diverse and welcoming community guided by the values…

Education
7
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
8
Saint Xavier University

Saint xavier university, a catholic institution inspired by the heritage of the sisters of mercy, educates persons to search for truth, think critically, communicate effectively and serve wisely and compassionately in support of human…

Education
9
Trustees of Dartmouth College

Dartmouth College educates the most promising students and prepares them for a lifetime of learning and of responsible leadership, through a faculty dedicated to teaching and the creation of knowledge.

Education
10
Trustees of Boston College

Mission strengthened by more than a century and a half of dedication to academic excellence, boston college commits itself to the highest standards of teaching and research in undergraduate, graduate and professional programs and to the…

Education
11
Northeastern University
Education
12
President and Trustees of Bates College

Bates is a college of the liberal arts and sciences, and is a coeducational, nonsectarian, residential college with special commitments to academic rigor, and to assuring in all of its efforts the dignity of each individual, and access to…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Brown University; the most unlike its peers is The American Film Institute. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 63 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
4/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

BRIGHAM YOUNG UNIVERSITY-IDAHO: $880,080 · OtherBRIGHAM YOUNG UNIVERSITY-IDAHOBRIGHAM YOUNG UNIVERSITY: $187,857 · OtherBRIGHAM YOUNG UNIVERSITYGANTRY FOUNDATION CO THE GANTRY GRO: $106,018 · OtherGANTRY FOUNDATION CO THE GANTRY GROENSIGN COLLEGE: $95,228 · OtherENSIGN COLLEGE+52 more: $386,705 · Other+52 moreBROWN UNIVERSITY: $187,780 · Community ImprovementBROWN UNIV…THE AMERICAN FILM INSTITUTE: $62,900 · Arts & CultureRivier University: $16,844 · EducationTHE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK: $15,000 · EducationBERKLEE COLLEGE OF MUSIC INC: $5,000 · EducationFRANCISCAN UNIVERSITY OF STEUBENVILLE: $5,000 · EducationFranklin Pierce University: $3,000 · Education
Other$1,655,888Community Improvement$187,780Arts & Culture$62,900Education$44,844

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetBROWN UNIVERSITY: $187,780 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE AMERICAN FILM INSTITUTE: $62,900 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetLABOURE COLLEGE OF HEALTHCARE INC: $19,938 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetRivier University: $16,844 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK: $15,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTRUSTEES OF BOSTON UNIVERSITY: $12,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBERKLEE COLLEGE OF MUSIC INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFRANCISCAN UNIVERSITY OF STEUBENVILLE: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFranklin Pierce University: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds BROWN UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds THE AMERICAN FILM INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds LABOURE COLLEGE OF HEALTHCARE INC ↗
  • Who funds Rivier University ↗
  • Who funds THE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK ↗
  • Who funds TRUSTEES OF BOSTON UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds BERKLEE COLLEGE OF MUSIC INC ↗
  • Who funds FRANCISCAN UNIVERSITY OF STEUBENVILLE ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift FundMA6.1× affinity5 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Hopkin Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Hopkin Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2025
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →median 12%
  • Trustees of Boston University: 12% of income from government
  • Berklee College of Music Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Hopkin Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Hopkin Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 63 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Hopkin’s filings →

More from the funding graph