Skip to content

· Private foundation

Hooper Legacy Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$98k
Granted FY2024still arriving
13
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$20k
Largest
01What it funds
0178% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2022 to 2024.

Health$126kHuman Services$49kPhilanthropy$35kArts & Culture$26kHousing & Shelter$14kRecreation & Sports$9kYouth Development$5kScience & Tech$5kOther$0
02FY2024 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k8 grants · $26k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $73k
$5,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$1.8M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ALZHEIMER'S ASSOCIATION$20,000
HOSPICE FOUNDATION$15,000
THE SALVATION ARMY$15,000
MENTAL HEALTH ASSOCIATION OF WNY$12,500
COMMUNITY MUSIC SCHOOL$10,000
Individual grant recipient$5,000
MUSEUM OF SCINECE$5,000
Individual grant recipient$5,000
RED BARN NATURE'S WAY FOUNDATION INC$4,000
GRAYCLIFF$3,000
ONE RED THREAD WQUINE COMMECTION$2,000
UPWARD DESIGN FOR LIFE$1,000
HUMMANGO$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–24, $11k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%Lothlorien Therapeutic Riding Center: $7k → 13%RED BARN NATURE'S WAY FOUNDATION INC: $4k → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

72%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$231k · 11 repeat orgs$90k to everyone else

11 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2024, 5 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

11
8

Total granted

$231k
$62k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-12%
+7%

Still filing today

9%
38%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 72% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $28k went to new ones.

50%100%’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’22’23’24
Human ServicesArts & CultureEducationPhilanthropyYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TS
    THE SALVATION ARMY
    3× · 2022–2024 · $45k
  • AA
    ALZHEIMER'S ASSOCIATION
    2× · 2023–2024 · $40k
  • BF
    Bison Fund
    2× · 2022–2023 · $35k

Funded once

  • AA
    Alzheimer's Assiciation of WNY
    one grant, 2022 · $15k
  • H
    Hospic
    one grant, 2022 · $15k
  • BP
    Buffalo Philharmonic Orchestra
    one grant, 2022 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Seneca Falls Performing Arts Center
Arts & Culture
2
Creative Ability Development Inc

See Schedule OThe Kanack School of Musical Artistry is the not-for-profit epicenter of Creative Ability Development (CAD) within our community and internationally. We provide an enriching, nurturing, and inclusive environment where all can…

Arts & Culture
3
The Catamount Center
Environment
4
High Ridge Harmony Farm
—
5
The Music Conservatory of Westchester Inc

The mission of music conservatory of westchester is to provide the extraordinary benefits of music to all in our community. we believe in the inherent power of music to provide personal enrichment, creative expression, lifelong learning,…

Arts & Culture
6
Alleyway Theatre Inc

Alleyway Theatre, Inc. is a 501(c)(3) non-profit professional theatre company and a collaborative incubator for bold, visceral new theatre works. Our education and development programs foster the talents of emergent artists from Western…

—
7
The Catskill Recreation Center Inc
Recreation & Sports
8
Grand Island Music Series
Arts & Culture
9
Hudson Valley Technology Development Center Inc
—
10
Spirithorse Rehabilitation Center

Our mission is to help every individual reach their full potential; horses and humans alike. We have three great programs that come together in harmony to accomplish that.

Human Services
11
Arts Letters and Numbers
Arts & Culture
12
Sullivan County Area Rehabilitation Center Inc

Rehabilitation services provided to handicapped individuals.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Buffalo Arts and Technology Center Inc; the most unlike its peers is The Portageville Chapel. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

7 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 7 of the 26 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
7/7
Grantees still filing
5/7
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

THE SALVATION ARMY: $45,000 · OtherTHE SALVATION ARMYALZHEIMER'S ASSOCIATION: $40,000 · OtherALZHEIMER'S ASSOCIATIONBison Fund: $35,000 · OtherBison FundMENTAL HEALTH ASSOCIATION OF WNY: $32,500 · OtherMENTAL HEALTH ASSOCIATION OF WNYHOSPICE FOUNDATION: $30,000 · OtherHOSPICE FOUNDATIONGraycliff: $18,250 · OtherGraycliffAlzheimer's Assiciation of WNY: $15,000 · OtherHospic: $15,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $15,000 · OtherBuffalo Philharmonic Orchestra: $10,000 · Other+9 more: $39,700 · Other+9 moreCommunity Music School: $10,000 · Arts & CultureTHE PORTAGEVILLE CHAPEL: $1,000 · Arts & CultureLOTHLORIEN THERAPEUTIC RIDING CENTER: $7,000 · Human ServicesRed Barn Natures Way Foundation Inc: $4,000 · Human ServicesALLEGHENY COLLEGE: $1,200 · EducationUPward Design for Life Corporation: $1,000 · Youth DevelopmentROSWELL PARK ALLIANCE FOUNDATION: $1,000 · Philanthropy
Other$295,450Arts & Culture$11,000Human Services$11,000Education$1,200Youth Development$1,000Philanthropy$1,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10k$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCommunity Music School: $10,000 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetRed Barn Natures Way Foundation Inc: $4,000 over 1y, 44% of budgetALLEGHENY COLLEGE: $1,200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE PORTAGEVILLE CHAPEL: $1,000 over 1y, 3.8% of budgetUPward Design for Life Corporation: $1,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetROSWELL PARK ALLIANCE FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Community Music School ↗
  • Who funds LOTHLORIEN THERAPEUTIC RIDING CENTER ↗
  • Who funds Red Barn Natures Way Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds ALLEGHENY COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds THE PORTAGEVILLE CHAPEL ↗
  • Who funds UPward Design for Life Corporation ↗
  • Who funds ROSWELL PARK ALLIANCE FOUNDATION ↗

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Hooper Legacy Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Hooper Legacy Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2025
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%3%13%28%50%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 26 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Hooper Legacy’s filings →

    More from the funding graph