Skip to content

· Public charity

Honkamp Family Foundation

$535k
Granted FY2024still arriving
4
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$200k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Education$934kPhilanthropy$200kHousing & Shelter$10k
02FY2024 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $525k
$200,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$6.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MALAIKA EARLY LEARNING CENTER$200,000
GREATER MILWAUKEE FOUNDATION$200,000
CENTER FOR URBAN TEACHING$125,000
ACTS COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–23, $104k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%SHARP LITERACY: $60k → 17%SHARP LITERACY INC: $44k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

65%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$609k · 4 repeat orgs$335k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +108% since the first grant, against +41% for those funded once.

4 repeat relationships: 1 still active in FY2024, 3 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

4
3

Total granted

$609k
$125k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+108%
+41%

Still filing today

100%
67%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 37% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $210k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
EducationHuman ServicesHousing & ShelterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CF
    CENTER FOR URBAN TEACHING INC
    4× · 2020–2024 · $425k · revenue +108%
  • ST AUGUSTINE PREPARATORY ACADEMY INC
    3× · 2020–2023 · $50k · revenue +342%
  • CITY FORWARD COLLECTIVE INC
    2× · 2020–2022 · $30k · revenue +61%

Funded once

  • THE MILWAUKEE SCIENCE EDUCATION CONSORTIUM INCgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $50k · revenue +41%
  • ROCKETSHIP EDUCATION WISCONSIN INC
    one grant, 2022 · $50k · revenue +8%
  • SM
    ST MARCUS LUTHERAN CHURCH
    one grant, 2022 · $25k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Central City Cyberschool of Milwaukee Inc

A charter school providing motivation to inner city children to promote a successful future

Education
2
Milwaukee Excellence Inc

The mission of the organization is to provide a high quality education for all students with choices after graduation that will provide financial stability, inspire personal freedom to builda legacy.

—
3
Downtown Montessori Academy Inc

To create a montessori environment where the child's early experiences with learning will help him or her to become a self-confident, competent, cooperative adult.

Education
4
The University School of Milwaukee Corporation

University school of milwaukee cultivates excellence in learning, leadership, and citizenship for prekindergarten through 12th grade students. students are engaged, known, and valued within our passionate independent school community…

Education
5
One City Schools Inc

Our mission is to seed a new model of public education that ensures young children are on track to succeed in a college or career preparatory program from birth through high school graduation.

Human Services
6
Urban Learning Collaborative Inc

We invest in urban communities by expanding access to academic, personal and professional growth opportunities.

Education
7
Milwaukee Math and Science Academy Inc

The mission of milwaukee math and science academy, inc. is to create a learning community in which:-teachers, parents and students work together to develop young people who are confident and achieve academic excellence in a powerful…

Education
8
Washington Leadership Academy Public Charter School

Wla combines best practices in teaching and learning, with the latest in educational technology to create an unparalleled high school experience. students will graduate from wla prepared for college, career, and lives of public leadership.

Education
9
Creative City Public Charter School Foundation Inc

Creative City Public Charter School's teachers, students and parents share governance and cooperate on curriculum and community decisions, building on the inquisitive nature of children to drive the project-based arts-integrated…

Education
10
Michigan Science Center

The mission of the michigan science center is to inspire curious minds of all ages to discover, explore and appreciate science, technology, engineering and math in a creative, dynamic learning environment.

Education
11
Great Mn Schools

We believe that great schools are the cornerstone of a just and thriving community. ensuring that every child is able to attend a school that works is our moral and social imperative - our children deserve no less.

Education
12
Woodlands School Inc

Woodlands school, inc. is a public charter non-profit school authorized through the univerity of wisconsin-milwaukee using a character-based education approach to prepare children for lifelong learning in a rapidly changing world.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is City Forward Collective Inc; the most unlike its peers is Sharp Literacy Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 10 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
5/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CENTER FOR URBAN TEACHING INC: $425,000 · EducationCENTER FOR URBAN TEACHING INCMALAIKA EARLY LEARNING CENTER: $200,000 · EducationMALAIKA EARLY LEARNING CENTERTHE MILWAUKEE SCIENCE EDUCATION CONSORTIUM INC: $50,000 · EducationTHE MILWAUKEE SCIENCE EDUCATION CONSORTIUM INCST AUGUSTINE PREPARATORY ACADEMY INC: $50,000 · EducationST AUGUSTINE PREPARATORY ACADEMY INCROCKETSHIP EDUCATION WISCONSIN INC: $50,000 · EducationROCKETSHIP EDUCATION WISCONSIN INCCITY FORWARD COLLECTIVE INC: $30,000 · EducationGREATER MILWAUKEE FOUNDATION INC: $200,000 · PhilanthropyGREATER MILWAUKEE F…SHARP LITERACY INC: $104,000 · Human ServicesSHARP LITE…ST MARCUS LUTHERAN CHURCH: $25,000 · OtherACTS COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION: $10,000 · Housing & Shelter
Education$805,000Philanthropy$200,000Human Services$104,000Other$25,000Housing & Shelter$10,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCENTER FOR URBAN TEACHING INC: $425,000 over 4y, 5.3% of budgetGREATER MILWAUKEE FOUNDATION INC: $200,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetMALAIKA EARLY LEARNING CENTER: $200,000 over 1y, 5.4% of budgetSHARP LITERACY INC: $104,000 over 2y, 4.0% of budgetTHE MILWAUKEE SCIENCE EDUCATION CONSORTIUM INC: $50,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetST AUGUSTINE PREPARATORY ACADEMY INC: $50,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetROCKETSHIP EDUCATION WISCONSIN INC: $50,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetCITY FORWARD COLLECTIVE INC: $30,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetACTS COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

United Way of Greater Milwaukee & Waukesha County IncWI19.8× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: United Way of Greater Milwaukee & Waukesha County Inc · Greater Milwaukee Foundation Inc · Anon Charitable Trust · The Lynde and Harry Bradley Foundation Inc · Green Bay Packers Foundation · Baird Foundation Inc · Ralph Evinrude Foundation Inc · Bradley Impact Fund Inc · Herbert H Kohl Charities Inc · Charities Aid Foundation America · City Forward Collective Inc · Arzbaecher Family Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Honkamp Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Honkamp Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Honkamp Family Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Honkamp Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 10 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Honkamp Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph