Skip to content
Homestreet Foundation at a glanceMostly funded, not a grantmaker: see who funds it →

· Private foundation

Homestreet Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$4k
Granted FY2025still arriving
1
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$4k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its fieldRead
04Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Housing & Shelter$171kHuman Services$96kFood & Nutrition$53kEmployment$50kCommunity Improvement$50kRecreation & Sports$45kYouth Development$24kPhilanthropy$16kOther$0
02FY2025 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$3,786
Median grant
1
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Queen Anne Helpline$3,786
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $137k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 17% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%MARK WAHLBERG YOUTH FOUNDATION: $24k → 8%MARY'S SHELTER: $24k → 11%HELPLINE HOUSE: $100 → 10%Northwest Access Fund: $45k → 9%Vision House: $45k → 9%HOPELINK: $250 → 9%SOUTH KING COUNTY FOOD COALITION: $125 → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Snoqualmie Valley Food Bank

Our mission is to provide food and key resources to help our neighbors and community thrive. we lead the effort to feed, educated and advocate ending hunger in the snoqualmie valley and beyond.

Food & Nutrition
2
Port Angeles Food Bank

Nourishing our community. the port angeles food bank is the main food bank in clallam county, providing food to 13 other area pantries and meal programs as well as providing food to over 5,000 individuals per month.

Food & Nutrition
3
Columbia Pacific Food Bank

Columbia pacific food bank is the regional food distribution center for columbia county, oregon and local food pantry for the community of saint helens.

Food & Nutrition
4
Renewal Food Bank

Renewal Food Bank provides food to needy and economically vulnerable individuals who live in Bellevue, Washington and surrounding communities

Human Services
5
Rainier Valley Food Bank

Our mission is to nourish with good food, empower with knowledge, and serve with compassion.

Unclassified
6
Des Moines Area Food Bank

The des moines area food bank provides emergency food assistance to families in need.

—
7
Issaquah Food and Clothing Bank

Unite our community in nourishing and nurturing individuals by removing barriers to healthy food, vital resources, and connections to essential services.

Human Services
8
Northwest Harvest Emm

The organization's mission is growing food justice through collective action. the organization's vision is ending hunger in washington state.

—
9
Skagit Gleaners

Food recovery for low income families over 600 families served

—
10
Feeding Washington

Create a strong and effective statewide infrastructure that efficiently leverages resources to expand capacity in Washington State's Feeding America network.

Food & Nutrition
11
Nourish Pierce County

To provide food to individuals in need with compassion, dignity and respect. No one needing assistance is turned away.

—
12
Puyallup Food Bank

We are passionate about meeting the urgent needs of our neighbors and partnering to assist them, believing food is the first step on their journey to a more hopeful future!

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is South King County Food Coalition Skcfc; the most unlike its peers is Snohomish Community Food Bank. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

32 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 32 of the 41 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
32/32
Grantees still filing
26/32
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

FUSION-FRIENDS UNITED TO SHELTER: $50,000 · Human ServicesFUSION-FRIENDS UNITED TO SHELTERNORTHWEST ACCESS FUND: $45,000 · Human ServicesNORTHWEST ACCESS FUNDVISION HOUSE: $45,000 · Human ServicesVISION HOUSETHE MARK WAHLBERG YOUTH FOUNDATION INC: $23,500 · Human ServicesTHE MARK WAHLBERG YOUTH FOUNDATION INCMARY'S SHELTER: $23,500 · Human ServicesMARY'S SHELTER+3 more: $475 · Human ServicesEVERGREEN GOODWILL OF NORTHWEST WASHINGTON: $50,000 · OtherEVERGREEN GOODWILL OF NORTHWEST W…CHILDHAVEN: $50,000 · OtherCHILDHAVENSeattle University Ramp UP Program: $45,000 · OtherSeattle University Ramp UP Progra…+12 more: $9,141 · Other+12 moreRAINIER VALLEY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT FUND: $50,000 · Community ImprovementRAINIER VAL…PLYMOUTH HOUSING GROUP AND SUBSIDIARIES: $48,800 · Housing & ShelterPLYMOUTH H…BACKPACK BRIGADE: $43,000 · Food & NutritionBACKPACK B…FOOD LIFELINE: $3,970 · Food & NutritionFOOD LIFEL…+4 more: $1,450 · Food & NutritionSEATTLE FOUNDATION: $11,050 · PhilanthropyTHE SAN DIEGO FOUNDATION: $1,400 · PhilanthropyInnovia Foundation: $1,030 · PhilanthropyCALIFORNIA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $550 · Philanthropy+4 more: $1,100 · PhilanthropySeattle Police Foundation: $10,000 · Crime & LegalMOUNTAIN VIEW COMMUNITY CENTER: $150 · Recreation & Sports
Human Services$187,475Other$154,141Community Improvement$50,000Housing & Shelter$48,800Food & Nutrition$48,420Philanthropy$15,130Crime & Legal$10,000Recreation & Sports$150

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetRAINIER VALLEY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT FUND: $50,000 over 1y, 3.0% of budgetEVERGREEN GOODWILL OF NORTHWEST WASHINGTON: $50,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFUSION-FRIENDS UNITED TO SHELTER: $50,000 over 1y, 6.6% of budgetCHILDHAVEN: $50,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetPLYMOUTH HOUSING GROUP AND SUBSIDIARIES: $48,800 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetNORTHWEST ACCESS FUND: $45,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetVISION HOUSE: $45,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetBACKPACK BRIGADE: $43,000 over 1y, 3.8% of budgetTHE MARK WAHLBERG YOUTH FOUNDATION INC: $23,500 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetMARY'S SHELTER: $23,500 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetSEATTLE FOUNDATION: $11,050 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSeattle Police Foundation: $10,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetFOOD LIFELINE: $3,970 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetQUEEN ANNE HELPLINE: $3,786 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetTHE SAN DIEGO FOUNDATION: $1,400 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetInnovia Foundation: $1,030 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHAWAII FOODBANK INC: $900 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCALIFORNIA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $550 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSNOHOMISH COMMUNITY FOOD BANK: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCommunity Foundation of Snohomish County: $350 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWest Seattle Food Bank: $300 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHAWAII COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $300 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBALLARD FOOD BANK: $300 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE OREGON COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHOPELINK: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCommunity Foundation for SW Washington: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHunger Intervention Program: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMOUNTAIN VIEW COMMUNITY CENTER: $150 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSOUTH KING COUNTY FOOD COALITION SKCFC: $125 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHELPLINE HOUSE: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCLARK COUNTY FOOD BANK: $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK OF ORANGE COUNTY INC: $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Puget Sound Energy Fo…The Norcliffe Foundat…Seattle FoundationWindermere FoundationUnited Way of King Co…Food LifelineNorthwest Harvest EmmGates FoundationWilkins Charitable Fo…Mightycause Charitabl…Lucky Seven FoundationWashington Federal Fo…
Puget Sound Energy FoundationDE31.4× affinity13 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Puget Sound Energy Foundation · The Norcliffe Foundation · Seattle Foundation · Windermere Foundation · United Way of King County · Food Lifeline · Northwest Harvest Emm · Gates Foundation · Wilkins Charitable Foundation · Mightycause Charitable Foundation · Lucky Seven Foundation · Washington Federal Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Homestreet Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Homestreet Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 2%
  • The Oregon Community Foundation: 2% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
23report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
04Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Homestreet Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Homestreet Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 41 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Homestreet’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home