Skip to content

· Private foundation

Homer A and Ida S Jones Trust

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$334
Granted FY2024still arriving
2
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$231
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Philanthropy$384kEducation$332kInternational$213kReligion$135kHuman Services$117kArts & Culture$9kPublic Benefit$2kPublic Safety & Disaster$1kOther$0
02FY2024 · 2 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$231
Median grant
1
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Schwab Charitable Donor-Advised Fd$231
Schwab Charitable Donor-Advised Fd$103
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–22, $111k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%Maharishi Global Admin Thru Nat Law: $25k → 16%American Red Cross: $1k → 14%YMCA of Bristol: $60k → 15%YMCA of Bristol: $8k → 15%YMCA of Bristol: $5k → 15%YMCA of Bristol: $5k → 15%YMCA of Bristol: $4k → 15%YMCA of Bristol: $3k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
NY
MA
IA
CA
CO
WV
VA
TN
DC
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.2M · 11 repeat orgs$39k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +178% since the first grant, against +46% for those funded once.

11 repeat relationships: 1 still active in FY2024, 10 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

11
7

Total granted

$1.2M
$39k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+178%
+46%

Still filing today

36%
57%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesEducationPhilanthropyFood & NutritionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TU
    THE UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE FOUNDATION INC
    6× · 2017–2022 · $185k · revenue +178%
  • YM
    Young Mens Christian Association
    6× · 2017–2022 · $85k · revenue +139%
  • TB
    THE BRISTOL PUBLIC LIBRARY FOUNDATION
    4× · 2019–2022 · $38k · revenue ×22

Funded once

  • MG
    MAHARISHI GLOBAL ADMIN THROUGH NATURAL LAWgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $25k · revenue +181%
  • RR
    Raam Raj Foundation
    one grant, 2019 · $6k
  • MP
    MAHARISHI PURUSHA PROGRAM
    one grant, 2019 · $3k · revenue -33%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Maharishi University of Enlightenment

To provide consciousness - based educational programs including post secondary educational programs.

Religion
2
Global Capital of World Peace

The Global Capital of World Peace, Inc (GCWPI) is organized to provide programs that help establish world peace. GCWPI will do this primarily by supporting the building and operating of residential meditation facilities to house and…

International
3
Mother Divine Program-Maharishi Global Country of World Peace Inc

To promote inner development and enlightenment in the individual and to create a peaceful and harmonious influence in the collective consciousness of society through the implementation of the programs of maharishi vedic science and…

Human Services
4
Global Country of World Peace

The organizations mission is to serve as a nonprofit organization organized and operated exclusively for educational charitable and scientific purposes making total knowledge of natural law as brought to light by maharishi mahesh yogi…

Science & Tech
5
Maharishi Integrated Health Foundation

As a supporting organization to support, benefit and carry out the purposes of publicaly supported organizations that are engaged in promoting the Transcendental Meditation program or other aspects of Maharishi Integrated Health

Health
6
Brahmananda Saraswati Foundation

To secure peace, affluence and invincibility for life everywhere on earth by providing perpetual support for large groups practicing transcendental meditation and its advanced techniques, especially large groups of maharishi vedic pandits…

Religion
7
University of Spiritual Research
Religion
8
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
9
Mk Gandhi Institute for Nonviolence

The M.K. Gandhi Institute for Nonviolence is a nonprofit that equips people to use nonviolence to create a sustainable and just world for all. (Continue on Sch O)The M.K. Gandhi Institute collaborates with local organizations, academic…

International
10
Trustees of Boston University

Organization's mission: boston university is an international, comprehensive, private research university, committed to educating students to be reflective, resourceful individuals ready to live, adapt, and lead in an interconnected world.…

—
11
Maharishi Vedic Science and Technology Foundation

Maharishi vedic science and technology foundation (mvstf) is organized to provide programs that promote individual and societal peace, happiness, prosperity, and perfect health, by engaging in activities that increase and promote the…

Science & Tech
12
Nithyananda Yoga Foundation Inc

To enrich the world by spreading the teachings of Hindu/Vedic culture/religion through practices, such as but not limited to, yoga and meditation.

Religion
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Maharishi Global Admin Through Natural Law; the most unlike its peers is Young Mens Christian Association. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 18 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
5/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Schwab Charitable Donor-Advised Fd: $384,210 · OtherSchwab Charitable Donor-Advised FdDavid Lynch Foundation: $108,751 · OtherDavid Lynch FoundationBrahmananda Saraswati Yagya Foundat: $80,025 · OtherBrahmananda Saraswati Yagya FoundatState Street United Methodist Churc: $36,000 · OtherState Street United Methodist ChurcFirst United Methodist Church: $22,000 · Other+6 more: $16,575 · OtherTHE UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE FOUNDATION INC: $185,000 · EducationTHE UNIVERSITY OF TEN…THE BRISTOL PUBLIC LIBRARY FOUNDATION: $38,000 · EducationTHE BRISTOL PUBLIC LI…GLOBAL PROJECTS FOR PEACE: $213,000 · PhilanthropyGLOBAL PROJECTS FOR …Young Mens Christian Association: $84,500 · Human ServicesYoung Mens…MAHARISHI GLOBAL ADMIN THROUGH NATURAL LAW: $25,000 · Human ServicesMAHARISHI …+1 more: $1,000 · Human ServicesGREATER CHICAGO FOOD DEPOSITORY: $1,000 · Food & Nutrition
Other$647,561Education$223,000Philanthropy$213,000Human Services$110,500Food & Nutrition$1,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetGLOBAL PROJECTS FOR PEACE: $213,000 over 4y, 6.3% of budgetTHE UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE FOUNDATION INC: $185,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetYoung Mens Christian Association: $84,500 over 6y, 2.3% of budgetTHE BRISTOL PUBLIC LIBRARY FOUNDATION: $38,000 over 4y, 22% of budgetMAHARISHI GLOBAL ADMIN THROUGH NATURAL LAW: $25,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetGREATER CHICAGO FOOD DEPOSITORY: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds GLOBAL PROJECTS FOR PEACE ↗
  • Who funds THE UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds Young Mens Christian Association ↗
  • Who funds THE BRISTOL PUBLIC LIBRARY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds MAHARISHI GLOBAL ADMIN THROUGH NATURAL LAW ↗
  • Who funds MAHARISHI PURUSHA PROGRAM ↗
  • Who funds GREATER CHICAGO FOOD DEPOSITORY ↗
  • Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift FundMA5.3× affinity4 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Homer A and Ida S Jones Trust funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Homer A and Ida S Jones Trust. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%2%6%14%25%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 18 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Homer A and Ida S Jones’ filings →

    More from the funding graph